Texas High School teacher in orgies with teenage boys

[DGuller]

America is such a retarded country. It's almost as bad as Russia or Iran. 

America is not as bad as Russia.

[viper37]

When I was in high school, female teachers weren't having gangbangs with jocks.

When you were in high school, females teachers were over 50.

[viper37]

Regardless of any instantenous moral question or judgment about this issue, what exactly can be done to prevent these? Obviously the extreme idea that teachers and students should fuck anytime they want with no restriction, as long as they consent, is unacceptable and unprofessional. But neither is segregation or draconian punishments. Yet we cannot stop immature people being attracted to teenager and almost young adults. Shouldn't there be some systemic approach to detect teachers with these proclivities and reaffect them, even on mere suspiscions? 

You're mixing two different issues.  Improper conduct at work and criminal behavior.

A teacher fucking 18 year old student is certainly not acceptable as part of her work.  Same as a school teacher doing porn.  But none of this should deserve jail time, or even a fine.  A temporary or permanent suspension depending on the acts, but not jail.

It's like a woman cheating on her husband.  It's improper marital conduct, but we don't stone women for that.  We do grant divorce however.

[Berkut]

It's like a woman cheating on her husband.  It's improper marital conduct, but we don't stone women for that.  We do grant divorce however.

Some people argue that maybe we shouldn't be so quick to grant those divorces. If we force people to remain married longer, then we can maybe decrease the rampant incidences of people not remaining married.

After all, maybe the state knows best when a couple needs to end their marriage.

[Habbaku]

 

[CountDeMoney]

Some people argue that maybe we shouldn't be so quick to grant those divorces. If we force people to remain married longer, then we can maybe decrease the rampant incidences of people not remaining married.

After all, maybe the state knows best when a couple needs to end their marriage.

If I were still a bail bondsman, I would wholeheartedly endorse this concept of enforced domestic violence as an additional guaranteed revenue stream.

[Ideologue]

If I were practicing in the field I trained in, I would also approve.

[DGuller]

It's like a woman cheating on her husband.  It's improper marital conduct, but we don't stone women for that.  We do grant divorce however.

Some people argue that maybe we shouldn't be so quick to grant those divorces. If we force people to remain married longer, then we can maybe decrease the rampant incidences of people not remaining married.

After all, maybe the state knows best when a couple needs to end their marriage.

  Berkut's back!

[Barrister]

It's like a woman cheating on her husband.  It's improper marital conduct, but we don't stone women for that.  We do grant divorce however.

Some people argue that maybe we shouldn't be so quick to grant those divorces. If we force people to remain married longer, then we can maybe decrease the rampant incidences of people not remaining married.

After all, maybe the state knows best when a couple needs to end their marriage.

Indeed.

[merithyn]

It's like a woman cheating on her husband.  It's improper marital conduct, but we don't stone women for that.  We do grant divorce however.

Some people argue that maybe we shouldn't be so quick to grant those divorces. If we force people to remain married longer, then we can maybe decrease the rampant incidences of people not remaining married.

After all, maybe the state knows best when a couple needs to end their marriage.

Bring back the divorce of the early 1900s that required that you give a "good" reason in order to get a divorce. None of this "irreconciable differences" bullshit. Gotta be something good and salacious and printed in the paper... with details.

[Berkut]

It's like a woman cheating on her husband.  It's improper marital conduct, but we don't stone women for that.  We do grant divorce however.

Some people argue that maybe we shouldn't be so quick to grant those divorces. If we force people to remain married longer, then we can maybe decrease the rampant incidences of people not remaining married.

After all, maybe the state knows best when a couple needs to end their marriage.

Bring back the divorce of the early 1900s that required that you give a "good" reason in order to get a divorce. None of this "irreconciable differences" bullshit. Gotta be something good and salacious and printed in the paper... with details.

No kidding!

We should go back to the early 1900s on most marriage issues, don't you think?

[CountDeMoney]

I want to go back to 1990, and bang my first married chick again. Damn, was she smoking ass hot.

[garbon]

We should go back to the early 1900s on most marriage issues, don't you think?

On most issues in general.

[CountDeMoney]

We should go back to the early 1900s on most marriage issues, don't you think?

On most issues in general.

Pay that poll tax, boy.

[garbon]

We should go back to the early 1900s on most marriage issues, don't you think?

On most issues in general.

Pay that poll tax, boy.

I don't care that much for voting.