Palin suggests an Obama-Clinton ticket

[CountDeMoney]

He said Romney/Ryan were going to put "y'all back in chains" and he was addressing an audience that was at least half black.  Who was in chains before?  Black slaves.  It's race-baiting, plain & simple. 

Perhaps chains is too harsh.  Just taking away their right to vote should be enough, right?

Now his use of "y'all" wasn't quite as bad as Hillary's "I don't feel noways tired" back in 2007, but it was pretty bad.

It's Joe Biden. Not using "y'all" would be suspicious.

[garbon]

He said Romney/Ryan were going to put "y'all back in chains" and he was addressing an audience that was at least half black.  Who was in chains before?  Black slaves.  It's race-baiting, plain & simple. 

Perhaps chains is too harsh.  Just taking away their right to vote should be enough, right?

Not sure the relevance considering that wasn't what was said.

[Razgovory]

No sane person likes unions. Besides, I don't see how one would think it a good idea to talk about chains in a town that is half black.  All of your examples involve white people talking to white people. Relevance?

Relevance?  It was relevant to the charge of "unchaining" Wall Street.  Ergo, the chains of economic suppression.  Like the last thing this nation needs is an unregulated Wall Street. Duh.

Really don't see why you Republitards see racism in everything.

He said Romney/Ryan were going to put "y'all back in chains" and he was addressing an audience that was at least half black.  Who was in chains before?  Black slaves.  It's race-baiting, plain & simple. 

Now his use of "y'all" wasn't quite as bad as Hillary's "I don't feel noways tired" back in 2007, but it was pretty bad.

Oh, now you are worried about race baiting.

[Grey Fox]

Of course you don't, you are rich.

[CountDeMoney]

He said Romney/Ryan were going to put "y'all back in chains" and he was addressing an audience that was at least half black.  Who was in chains before?  Black slaves.  It's race-baiting, plain & simple. 

Perhaps chains is too harsh.  Just taking away their right to vote should be enough, right?

Not sure the relevance considering that wasn't what was said.

Well, discussing the Ryan budget is a non-starter with you guys, so hey.

[garbon]

He said Romney/Ryan were going to put "y'all back in chains" and he was addressing an audience that was at least half black.  Who was in chains before?  Black slaves.  It's race-baiting, plain & simple. 

Perhaps chains is too harsh.  Just taking away their right to vote should be enough, right?

Not sure the relevance considering that wasn't what was said.

Well, discussing the Ryan budget is a non-starter with you guys, so hey.

D explained why it was a bad remark to make and now you are dodging and weaving.

[garbon]

Of course you don't, you are rich.

If I was rich I wouldn't be in this cubicle right now.

[CountDeMoney]

D explained why it was a bad remark to make and now you are dodging and weaving.

I disagree with D, as did the audience and the President of the United States.

[garbon]

D explained why it was a bad remark to make and now you are dodging and weaving.

I disagree with D, as did the audience and the President of the United States.

So race baiting is alright when the proponents are on your side?

[dps]

Biden needs to be put in a home, but at this point I hope he stays on the ticket.  Within the past 2 days we've had:

• "gonna put y'all back in chains"
• thinking he was in North Carolina when he was in Virginia
• forgetting which century we're in
• calling Paul Ryan "Governor Ryan"

Drudge is making a big deal about Obama meeting with Biden this morning and then Hillary directly afterward, but apparently those meetings were scheduled long ago.

Why would the President want to drop Biden from the ticket for this?  Wasn't Biden's role in the administration always supposed to have been as the wacky comic relief?  Seems like he's just doing his job.

[derspiess]

D explained why it was a bad remark to make and now you are dodging and weaving.

I disagree with D, as did the audience and the President of the United States.

BUT DOUG WILDER (D) AGREES WITH ME


Anyway, if you dig through Obama's remarks, he did say "his phrasing is a distraction from what is at stake".

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-defends-biden-over-chains-remark-231846165.html

[CountDeMoney]

So race baiting is alright when the proponents are on your side?

I ain't sayin' nuffin'.

[CountDeMoney]

Anyway, if you dig through Obama's remarks, he did say "his phrasing is a distraction from what is at stake".

Of course he'd say that. The President is above petty political mudslinging.

[garbon]

So race baiting is alright when the proponents are on your side?

I ain't sayin' nuffin'.

Different note, I'm glad to see Obama is wasting time fighting back on this:
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/08/obama-campaign-strikes-back-against-former-navy-seals/55847/

[Sheilbh]

I like how the press are pretending Palin's relevant