News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

France Bans Public Prayer

Started by jimmy olsen, September 18, 2011, 07:14:02 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

crazy canuck

Quote from: Valmy on September 19, 2011, 03:12:10 PM
What the fuck?  The French state does not care how you worship so long as you do not make a public show of it because of that 500 year history thing.

Valmy you are not really that dense. The State does not care how you worship so long as you worship in a manner deemed acceptable by the State.  I dont really care much what the historical justification is the State uses for banning worshippers from using a public space.  If there is no other interest involved (here blockage of traffic) I dont see any reason why the State should interfere at all.

I find it stricking that the French (and you being almost French) have such a cavalier attitude toward matters of freedom of expression and religion.

Zoupa

Quote from: crazy canuck on September 19, 2011, 03:22:25 PM
The State does not care how you worship so long as you worship in a manner deemed acceptable by the State. 

That's the case in every single country in the world. Don't be dense either.

QuoteI find it stricking that the French (and you being almost French) have such a cavalier attitude toward matters of freedom of expression and religion.

Freedom of religion only goes so far as all other freedoms. They must not infringe on others. A literal interpretation of all religions out there would impose things that would be illegal in any democracy.

crazy canuck

Quote from: Zoupa on September 19, 2011, 03:35:21 PM
That's the case in every single country in the world. Don't be dense either.

I am not aware of any other civilized countries in which the public practice of religion is banned.  Here religious groups often use public spaces such as parks to hold religious events.

I am somewhat mystified as to what it is about religion that the French feel restricting the freedom to worship to be imperative and indeed normal.

Zoupa

QuoteI am not aware of any other civilized countries in which the public practice of religion is banned.

Don't move the goalposts. What you said was:

QuoteThe State does not care how you worship so long as you worship in a manner deemed acceptable by the State.

That statement is accurate for every country in the world. States impose restrictions on religious practice everywhere. Hence the no polygamy laws targeting Mormons. It's also not possible to lapidate women in BC I believe. STOP THE PRESSES! MY FREEDOMS ARE BEING RESTRICTED!!!

Zoupa

Quote from: crazy canuck on September 19, 2011, 03:38:48 PM
I am somewhat mystified as to what it is about religion that the French feel restricting the freedom to worship to be imperative and indeed normal.

I can only give you my opinion, which is that religion is not a positive influence. Personally, I find practicing religious people of any faith weird, backwards and sorta dumb.

Razgovory

Why does a 500 year history matter?
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

dps

Quote from: crazy canuck on September 19, 2011, 03:38:48 PM
Quote from: Zoupa on September 19, 2011, 03:35:21 PM
That's the case in every single country in the world. Don't be dense either.

I am not aware of any other civilized countries in which the public practice of religion is banned.  Here religious groups often use public spaces such as parks to hold religious events.

I am somewhat mystified as to what it is about religion that the French feel restricting the freedom to worship to be imperative and indeed normal.

It's not about religion, really, it's about state control.  The specific issue being discussed in this thread involves religion, but what actually being debated is what is the limit of the public sphere versus the private sphere in modern society, and how they should interact.   Many Europeans appear to be comfortable with a level of government control over anything that's in the public sphere that just wouldn't fly in the US (and, from your reaction, apparantly not in Canada), and also with a broader definition of what constitues the public sphere than we'd normally acknowledge in the US.

Viking

I know I might be expected to comment on this, me being Languish's Dawkins wannabe. But I have to side with muslims on this one. If there isn't a law against sitting on the sidewalk then making a law to ban praying on the sidewalk is religious discrimination. If there is a law against sitting on the sidewalk then that law should be sufficient. The real discrimination is the inability of muslims to get enough space for prayer. They want it and they are willing to spend money on it, but they can't buy and they cant get planning permission.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Zoupa

They're not sitting on the sidewalk. They're on the actual road.

crazy canuck

Quote from: Zoupa on September 19, 2011, 03:55:53 PM
QuoteI am not aware of any other civilized countries in which the public practice of religion is banned.

Don't move the goalposts. What you said was:

QuoteThe State does not care how you worship so long as you worship in a manner deemed acceptable by the State.

That statement is accurate for every country in the world. States impose restrictions on religious practice everywhere. Hence the no polygamy laws targeting Mormons. It's also not possible to lapidate women in BC I believe. STOP THE PRESSES! MY FREEDOMS ARE BEING RESTRICTED!!!

The big white elephant in the room you are trying to avoid is the justification of why the State should care if people worship in public.

Oexmelin

Quote from: Zoupa on September 19, 2011, 04:11:43 PM
They're not sitting on the sidewalk. They're on the actual road.

Indeed. It was the case close to where I lived, in the XIth. Besides, Paris sidewalks barely accomodate pedestrians... ;)

Que le grand cric me croque !

Warspite

Quote from: Zoupa on September 19, 2011, 03:55:53 PM
QuoteI am not aware of any other civilized countries in which the public practice of religion is banned.

Don't move the goalposts. What you said was:

QuoteThe State does not care how you worship so long as you worship in a manner deemed acceptable by the State.

That statement is accurate for every country in the world. States impose restrictions on religious practice everywhere. Hence the no polygamy laws targeting Mormons. It's also not possible to lapidate women in BC I believe. STOP THE PRESSES! MY FREEDOMS ARE BEING RESTRICTED!!!

The difference between prayer and lapidation, of course, is that the former deprives no one of their liberty, and thus the state should have no business prohibiting it.
" SIR – I must commend you on some of your recent obituaries. I was delighted to read of the deaths of Foday Sankoh (August 9th), and Uday and Qusay Hussein (July 26th). Do you take requests? "

OVO JE SRBIJA
BUDALO, OVO JE POSTA

Viking

Can't the Paris police just arrest people for obstructing traffic for sitting in the street rather than making a law for mooselimbs?
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Martinus

Quote from: Zoupa on September 19, 2011, 02:44:14 PM
Watch us.  :)
You frogs may be a bunch of arrogant pricks but I still love you.

Zoupa

Quote from: Viking on September 19, 2011, 04:53:22 PM
Can't the Paris police just arrest people for obstructing traffic for sitting in the street rather than making a law for mooselimbs?

It's not a law for muslims, it's a law against praying ON the street in any way that disrupts the movements of men or goods.