News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Who the hell is an immigrant?

Started by Slargos, April 27, 2011, 07:36:46 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Razgovory

Quote from: Pat on May 01, 2011, 02:30:07 PM
Is it really so hard to understand that words can have different meanings depending on context? Not that it's just you with that problem. Is it some American thing?

I think it might be an American thing.

There is a term "fitness" in biology but doesn't seem to apply to your odd dichotomy of "Cold" vs "Tropic".  However, "fitness" is frequently used in discussions of evolution by people who don't know much about Darwinian Evolution.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Pat

Oh and LOL, yeah, obviously I made all this shit up.

"In October 1838, that is, fifteen months after I had begun my systematic inquiry, I happened to read for amusement Malthus on Population, and being well prepared to appreciate the struggle for existence which everywhere goes on from long- continued observation of the habits of animals and plants, it at once struck me that under these circumstances favourable variations would tend to be preserved, and unfavourable ones to be destroyed. The results of this would be the formation of a new species. Here, then I had at last got a theory by which to work".

Charles Darwin, from his autobiography. (1876)

Theories of agriculture relevant to things before agriculture? Nonsense that even Raz can see the flaws in!

Pat

Not to mention Darwin uses words like favorable and unfavorable! He must be ill versed in Darwinianism. Because that's a word we can only use to describe exactly what he said and nothing else.

grumbler

Quote from: Razgovory on May 01, 2011, 02:37:48 PM
I think it might be an American thing.

There is a term "fitness" in biology but doesn't seem to apply to your odd dichotomy of "Cold" vs "Tropic".  However, "fitness" is frequently used in discussions of evolution by people who don't know much about Darwinian Evolution.
I don't understand your point, Raz.  You were the person who introduced the word "fitness" into this discussion.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

Pat

And oh I forgot! The generally understood meaning of favorable is something that we people find favorable. So that must be what he means and it if that's not what he means he's wrong.

Razgovory

Quote from: grumbler on May 01, 2011, 02:42:53 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on May 01, 2011, 02:37:48 PM
I think it might be an American thing.

There is a term "fitness" in biology but doesn't seem to apply to your odd dichotomy of "Cold" vs "Tropic".  However, "fitness" is frequently used in discussions of evolution by people who don't know much about Darwinian Evolution.
I don't understand your point, Raz.  You were the person who introduced the word "fitness" into this discussion.

He used the word "fittest".  There was a reason I changed it to "Fitness" but I forgot what it was.  Some grammatical reason.  I oven change the sentence structure several times before I post so and sometimes I leave parts out.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Pat

Dude, I used the phrase "survival of the fittest" which Darwin himself used from 5th ed. of Species onwards. I know he didn't coin it but he used it himself and he used it as a synonym for natural selection. I used it to describe the ideas of Darwin in the words he himself used, and because of this you say I don't know much about Darwinism?

grumbler

Quote from: Razgovory on May 01, 2011, 02:49:23 PM
He used the word "fittest".  There was a reason I changed it to "Fitness" but I forgot what it was.  Some grammatical reason.  I oven change the sentence structure several times before I post so and sometimes I leave parts out.
"Survival of the fittest" is about the "best fit" (into the environment) not the "most fit" (which is the kind of "fit" used in "fitness").
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

Pat

Well it was Spencer who coined the term and he was a social darwinist so I guess it could have been meant that way by him (I honestly don't know, maybe you know better grumbler). But anyway I praised Krapotkin who was the foremost opponent of the social darwinists and the one who championed alternative interpretations so there is really no reason to interpret it as some sort of support for social darwinism on my part simply because I use the term (unless of course one is bent on interpreting everything as maliciously as possible). For the record I am not a social darwinist...

Razgovory

Quote from: grumbler on May 01, 2011, 02:59:15 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on May 01, 2011, 02:49:23 PM
He used the word "fittest".  There was a reason I changed it to "Fitness" but I forgot what it was.  Some grammatical reason.  I oven change the sentence structure several times before I post so and sometimes I leave parts out.
"Survival of the fittest" is about the "best fit" (into the environment) not the "most fit" (which is the kind of "fit" used in "fitness").

I don't think that was what Spencer meant.  I believe he intended "Fittest" to me "superior"

QuoteCombined with the enormous multiplying powers of all organisms, & the "struggle for existence" leading to the constant destruction of by far the largest proportion,—facts which no one of your opponents, as far as I am aware, has denied or misunderstood,—"the survival of the fittest" rather than of those who were less fit, could not possibly be denied or misunderstood.
http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-5140#back-mark-5140.f5  Here is a letter discussing the term.  Sent to Darwin from fellow naturalist Alfred Wallace discussing Spencer's term.  The impression I get is "fittest" is assumed to mean "fitness" not "fitting".

Anyway, I was taught that "survival of the fittest" is a bad term to use being inaccurate and confusing.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Pat

Yes I tried to be really clear and succinct in getting my post across but then I realized I could be misunderstood so I made sure I carefully explained that I meant "competition" from a strictly darwinian perspective which is absolutely not the same thing as normal competition and then you went ahead and tried to "get me" on not doing the same thing with another phrase (which I of course also intended to be interpreted in the same way).

Neil

Why are you guys debating Darwinism?
I do not hate you, nor do I love you, but you are made out of atoms which I can use for something else.

Pat

I guess because threads can evolve and devolve, become more or less fit, more or less favorable (everything depending on perspective)

Neil

Why not discuss the corpuscular theory or a heliocentric universe while you're at it?  Or a flat earth?
I do not hate you, nor do I love you, but you are made out of atoms which I can use for something else.

Pat

#209
What of darwinism I have mentioned is favorable variations propagating. If you're saying that part has been superceded you're wrong.

edit: That they propagate, not how...