News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

[Canada] Canadian Politics Redux

Started by Josephus, March 22, 2011, 09:27:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

PJL

Quote from: crazy canuck on Today at 11:35:22 AM
Quote from: PJL on Today at 11:09:39 AMIf Albertan politicians can get enough support from the voters for the gerrymandering, then they would be right in calling the courts undemocratic. Ultimately, laws are there for the benefit of the people. If enough of them deem it unjust (aka undemocratic), then they do have the right to change it in the long run, irrespective of the courts.

Laws are there to benefit the people, and the supreme law in our country is our constitution.  If a law is unconstitutional, it is struck down.

Explain to me why this is a bad thing?

All laws and the Constitution itself are there to serve the people and are ultimately subject to change if enough people desire it so. There is no problem with that, as long as it is done through the proper democratic principles.

crazy canuck

Quote from: PJL on Today at 11:39:47 AM
Quote from: crazy canuck on Today at 11:35:22 AM
Quote from: PJL on Today at 11:09:39 AMIf Albertan politicians can get enough support from the voters for the gerrymandering, then they would be right in calling the courts undemocratic. Ultimately, laws are there for the benefit of the people. If enough of them deem it unjust (aka undemocratic), then they do have the right to change it in the long run, irrespective of the courts.

Laws are there to benefit the people, and the supreme law in our country is our constitution.  If a law is unconstitutional, it is struck down.

Explain to me why this is a bad thing?

All laws and the Constitution itself are there to serve the people and are ultimately subject to change if enough people desire it so. There is no problem with that, as long as it is done through the proper democratic principles.

Yes, and who gets to decide whether the proper Democratic principles are applied?  That's right, under our system of democracy it is the court who makes that decision.  It is the court that decides whether a law is compliant with the constitution and whether governmental decision makers are acting within the authority given to them by a statute.

Now go back to your original post and explain to me how what you said is compliant with the rule of law.
Awarded 17 Zoupa points

In several surveys, the overwhelming first choice for what makes Canada unique is multiculturalism. This, in a world collapsing into stupid, impoverishing hatreds, is the distinctly Canadian national project.

crazy canuck

Quote from: Grey Fox on Today at 10:19:42 AMInteresting. Quebec just went thru this entire ordeal. Commission recommends, government & all MPs really disagree and enact a law, law gets struck drown by the courts.

It's going to happen for Alberta too.

What was the reason the politicians in Quebec gave for not adopting the commission's report?
Awarded 17 Zoupa points

In several surveys, the overwhelming first choice for what makes Canada unique is multiculturalism. This, in a world collapsing into stupid, impoverishing hatreds, is the distinctly Canadian national project.