News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

TV/Movies Megathread

Started by Eddie Teach, March 06, 2011, 09:29:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Duque de Bragança

Quote from: Savonarola on October 08, 2025, 04:12:38 PMDaughters of Darkness (1976)

Vampires can't have tan lines.  :mad:  This film has absolutely no credibility.   :mad:  :mad:  :mad:

Lesbian vampires run amok in Belgium!  Countess Elizabeth Báthory and her "Personal secretary" (;) ;)) arrive at a hotel where a very 70s newlywed couple is staying.  Countess Báthory seems friendly, but the hotel clerk remembers her staying at the same hotel 40 years ago and looking the same as she does today and there are a number of young women found murdered in nearby Bruges all of them completely drained of blood.  Could these facts be related?  Could this Countess Báthory in fact be the same as the bathed in the blood of virgins?  and could she be leading the newlywed wife into a depraved world of lesbian blood-drinking?

This is a little better than most 70s Euro-sexploitation vampire films (not a real high recommendation, I realize.)  For one thing the cast all speaks English rather than being dubbed.  For another the film works the psychological angle more plausibly than most.

Seems there are two language versions of it then. Don't remember Delphine Seyrig having another role in English.
Well, given the level of most 70s euro-sexploitation vampire, even Rollin, I can see your point.
Those into lesbian vampire feminism would enjoy it more I believe.  :P

Josquius

Quote from: Norgy on October 09, 2025, 11:38:06 PM
Quote from: Sheilbh on October 04, 2025, 10:58:32 AMMentioned in the other thread but got accidentally dragged into a massive Morse marathon - then ended up in a wider exploration of the ITV4/Viking River Cruises Cinematic Universe. So I watched the prequel, Endeavour, which I really liked (I love Roger Allam and Anton Lesser though).

The started watching Lewis and had forgotten Laurence Fox is the sidekick there which rather ruins it (especially as his character is a bit of a bell). Makes me slightly sad as I feel Kevin Wheatley deserved better.

I loved (and love) Morse. On Fridays, there was something called "Detektimen" on NRK. We were shown "Bergerac" (which I loved) and "Derrick", a German serial set in Munich. It was a bit, well, repetitive. Horst Tappert, who played Derrick, usually spent his summers in Norway. He also spent his youth in the Hitlerjugend, so it somewhat diminished his reputation here.

"Morse" came along, and most of us were hooked, although a bit worried that how many murders there were in Oxford. Not that any of us would have qualified for studies there, anyhow.

Did Vera reach over that way?
Similar thing. But a woman. And in the north.
I confess I've watched a few episodes when bits were filmed in e.g. my old school et al. Always funny to see them going down a set of stairs and teleporting across the city.
██████
██████
██████

celedhring

What we imagine as light

This was widely expected to be India's official Oscar submission last year after a strong festival run, until the academy there controversially picked another (apparently unremarkable) film. Given that the film  doesn't portray contemporary Indian society in the most flattering light (even though it's not a political film), it's hard not to see that decision as at least partly political.

The film follows three women working at a hospital in Mumbai: two nurses and a cook. The veteran nurse, a sticker for rules, is stuck in a limbo - she was married off in an arranged marriage years ago but she hasn't seen her husband in years, yet she still clings to the idea of the marriage. The younger, happy-go-lucky nurse is secretly dating a Muslim man, a relationship they both keep hidden from their families and that seems to have no future. And the cook is facing eviction from her home to make way for a luxury development.

It's a fantastic film, one of the best I've seen all year. Yes, it's a deliberately paced and understated movie about three women seeking happiness, but the filmmaking is fantastic, and the script is very tight and emotionally satisfying - it's not one of those films that just meanders. What impressed me most is how it portrays solidarity and resilience between these women without ever feeling phony or forcedly sentimental. There's a scene involving the older nurse and an amnesiac patient who mistakes her for his wife that it's one of the best bits of filmmaking and writing I've seen in years.

Reading up on he non-selection controversy, I see that some in India criticized the film for being "too European," and I can see where that comes from. The storytelling structure and tone are very approachable for a Western audience. It certainly doesn't feel as "alien" as other Indian movies I've seen.

Duque de Bragança

Tron: Ares

A departure from the previous two, specially TTron Legacy almost ignored, yet with some Tron fan-service. It targets people who have not seen the previous two says the script writer. I believe him.  :P

Disney wants a new franchise to milk it, a sequel more than alluded in the post-credits.

Technically, this is top-notch, CGI does not bother me for a movie such as Tron. However, given there is much more real world than grid this time, it may be more visible. Plenty of night shots though to compensate.

Did Jared Leto killed another cult movie?  :P

mongers

QuoteTron: Ares

A departure from the previous two, specially TTron Legacy almost ignored, yet with some Tron fan-service. It targets people who have not seen the previous two says the script writer. I believe him.  :P

Disney wants a new franchise to milk it, a sequel more than alluded in the post-credits.

Technically, this is top-notch, CGI does not bother me for a movie such as Tron. However, given there is much more real world than grid this time, it may be more visible. Plenty of night shots though to compensate.

Did Jared Leto killed another cult movie?  :P

So nothing special, hence the hyping on chat shows all over the place?
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

Savonarola

Quote from: Duque de Bragança on October 10, 2025, 12:01:58 AM
Quote from: Savonarola on October 08, 2025, 04:12:38 PMDaughters of Darkness (1976)

Vampires can't have tan lines.  :mad:  This film has absolutely no credibility.   :mad:  :mad:  :mad:

Lesbian vampires run amok in Belgium!  Countess Elizabeth Báthory and her "Personal secretary" (;) ;)) arrive at a hotel where a very 70s newlywed couple is staying.  Countess Báthory seems friendly, but the hotel clerk remembers her staying at the same hotel 40 years ago and looking the same as she does today and there are a number of young women found murdered in nearby Bruges all of them completely drained of blood.  Could these facts be related?  Could this Countess Báthory in fact be the same as the bathed in the blood of virgins?  and could she be leading the newlywed wife into a depraved world of lesbian blood-drinking?

This is a little better than most 70s Euro-sexploitation vampire films (not a real high recommendation, I realize.)  For one thing the cast all speaks English rather than being dubbed.  For another the film works the psychological angle more plausibly than most.

Seems there are two language versions of it then. Don't remember Delphine Seyrig having another role in English.
Well, given the level of most 70s euro-sexploitation vampire, even Rollin, I can see your point.
Those into lesbian vampire feminism would enjoy it more I believe.  :P

Yes, definitely, it's one of the definitive works of the genre.  If you go to its Wikipedia Page there's a whole section on interpretation by various critics including Camille Paglia.
In Italy, for thirty years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love, they had five hundred years of democracy and peace—and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock

mongers

'The Goodfather II' - seen for the first time, Al Pacino rules, no meaningful artistic comments from me.

Is the third one worth a viewing?
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

HVC

Quote from: mongers on October 10, 2025, 04:59:22 PM'The Goodfather II' - seen for the first time, Al Pacino rules, no meaningful artistic comments from me.

What took you so long?


QuoteIs the third one worth a viewing?

No.
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

mongers

Quote from: HVC on October 10, 2025, 05:18:00 PM
Quote from: mongers on October 10, 2025, 04:59:22 PM'The Goodfather II' - seen for the first time, Al Pacino rules, no meaningful artistic comments from me.

What took you so long?


Lack of focus, my entire life?
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

HVC

Quote from: mongers on October 10, 2025, 05:34:50 PM
Quote from: HVC on October 10, 2025, 05:18:00 PM
Quote from: mongers on October 10, 2025, 04:59:22 PM'The Goodfather II' - seen for the first time, Al Pacino rules, no meaningful artistic comments from me.

What took you so long?


Lack of focus, my entire life?

You're the type to watch the remakes before the originals, aren't you? :lol:
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

crazy canuck

Quote from: mongers on October 10, 2025, 04:59:22 PMIs the third one worth a viewing?

It should be nuked from orbit
Awarded 17 Zoupa points

In several surveys, the overwhelming first choice for what makes Canada unique is multiculturalism. This, in a world collapsing into stupid, impoverishing hatreds, is the distinctly Canadian national project.

Admiral Yi


celedhring

Godfather 3 would be an allright watch (nowhere near the previous two), but the new cast brings it down. Andy García is really miscast and Sofía Coppola - as talented as she is behind the camera - is embarrassingly bad, she takes me away from the film every time I try to watch it.

Norgy

It can be safely avoided, yes, and does not bring much closure to the Corleone story.

Since I love the futbol, I have watched the latest season of Welcome To Wrexham.
And it sort of, well, sucks.

Not because Wrexham aren't doing well, but the focus has shifted entirely, it seems.
Quite a lot is about Rob and Ryan being "good guys" now. When you pour so much money into a club, it is to be expected that results will come.

It is not a documentary, it is showmanship, and the clips from the matches are worse than ever.

Josquius

That's why I've never really got into the Wrexham one. It's always been a bunch of random shit around the club, very episodic rather than a continuing narrative.
I'm biased AF but Sunderland Till I Die was far better.
██████
██████
██████