Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld Knowingly Kept Innocent Men at Guantanamo

Started by jimmy olsen, April 09, 2010, 11:34:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

jimmy olsen

If true... :bleeding:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7092435.ece
QuoteGeorge W. Bush 'knew Guantánamo prisoners were innocent'

Tim Reid, Washinton

George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld covered up that hundreds of innocent men were sent to the Guantánamo Bay prison camp because they feared that releasing them would harm the push for war in Iraq and the broader War on Terror, according to a new document obtained by The Times.

The accusations were made by Lawrence Wilkerson, a top aide to Colin Powell, the former Republican Secretary of State, in a signed declaration to support a lawsuit filed by a Guantánamo detainee. It is the first time that such allegations have been made by a senior member of the Bush Administration.

Colonel Wilkerson, who was General Powell's chief of staff when he ran the State Department, was most critical of Mr Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld. He claimed that the former Vice-President and Defence Secretary knew that the majority of the initial 742 detainees sent to Guantánamo in 2002 were innocent but believed that it was "politically impossible to release them".

General Powell, who left the Bush Administration in 2005, angry about the misinformation that he unwittingly gave the world when he made the case for the invasion of Iraq at the UN, is understood to have backed Colonel Wilkerson's declaration.

Colonel Wilkerson, a long-time critic of the Bush Administration's approach to counter-terrorism and the war in Iraq, claimed that the majority of detainees — children as young as 12 and men as old as 93, he said — never saw a US soldier when they were captured. He said that many were turned over by Afghans and Pakistanis for up to $5,000. Little or no evidence was produced as to why they had been taken.

He also claimed that one reason Mr Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld did not want the innocent detainees released was because "the detention efforts would be revealed as the incredibly confused operation that they were". This was "not acceptable to the Administration and would have been severely detrimental to the leadership at DoD [Mr Rumsfeld at the Defence Department]".

Referring to Mr Cheney, Colonel Wilkerson, who served 31 years in the US Army, asserted: "He had absolutely no concern that the vast majority of Guantánamo detainees were innocent ... If hundreds of innocent individuals had to suffer in order to detain a handful of hardcore terrorists, so be it."

He alleged that for Mr Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld "innocent people languishing in Guantánamo for years was justified by the broader War on Terror and the small number of terrorists who were responsible for the September 11 attacks".

He added: "I discussed the issue of the Guantánamo detainees with Secretary Powell. I learnt that it was his view that it was not just Vice-President Cheney and Secretary Rumsfeld, but also President Bush who was involved in all of the Guantánamo decision making."

Mr Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld, Colonel Wilkerson said, deemed the incarceration of innocent men acceptable if some genuine militants were captured, leading to a better intelligence picture of Iraq at a time when the Bush Administration was desperate to find a link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11, "thus justifying the Administration's plans for war with that country".

He signed the declaration in support of Adel Hassan Hamad, a Sudanese man who was held at Guantánamo Bay from March 2003 until December 2007. Mr Hamad claims that he was tortured by US agents while in custody and yesterday filed a damages action against a list of American officials.

Defenders of Guantánamo said that detainees began to be released as early as September 2002, nine months after the first prisoners were sent to the jail at the US naval base in Cuba. By the time Mr Bush left office more than 530 detainees had been freed.

A spokesman for Mr Bush said of Colonel Wilkerson's allegations: "We are not going to have any comment on that." A former associate to Mr Rumsfeld said that Mr Wilkerson's assertions were completely untrue.

The associate said the former Defence Secretary had worked harder than anyone to get detainees released and worked assiduously to keep the prison population as small as possible. Mr Cheney's office did not respond.

There are currently about 180 detainees left in the facility.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

The Brain

Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Darth Wagtaros

PDH!

CountDeMoney


starbright

Why is Guantanamo prison still open? All Obama did was promise to close it and everyone forgot about it.

Alatriste

Quote from: starbright on April 10, 2010, 12:44:19 AM
Why is Guantanamo prison still open? All Obama did was promise to close it and everyone forgot about it.

For starters, I would say this thread proves otherwise...

Then, and just to put one example, Guantánamo appeared into the news here in Spain last week because the US wants us to accept in our country five inmates.
In short, the problem with closing Guantanamo is, what to do with the prisoners 

1. You don't want to set them free in America.
2. In many cases you can't and don't want to, set them free in their original countries.
3. It's understandably difficult to persuade other countries to accept people you don't want in yours...

This can be potentially disastrous. Even those that were completely innocent can't be trusted after years and years of being jailed, and it would take just one of those men killing someone, somewhere, to make all the Hansies of the world feel warm and fuzzy shouting 'We told you so!!!!!'  in a massive 'post hoc ergo propter hoc' fallacy.   

And that's with the innocent ones. I won't even enter the hellish problem of judging the others...

Sometimes I think 500 years in the future Guantánamo will be a touristic spot where proud villagers tell tourists how their grand grand fathers were brought to the island in shackles and when they were set free after ten years with 50,000$ in their pockets found nice Cuban girls and settled on the spot. Most restaurants will serve no pork, but that charming local tradition will attract hordes of Jew tourists.

Martinus

Tim, go fuck yourself with your :bleeding:

For the last 8 years, you were happily riding the official agit prop bandwagon, despite thousands of people saying that the lack of judicial oversight over Guantanamo opens it up to exactly that sort of abuse. If these allegations are true, they won't be surprising in the slightest.

I bet a fucking cretin like you, if you lived in the 1945 nazi Germany, would show a complete surprise about the Holocaust, too.

jimmy olsen

Quote from: Martinus on April 10, 2010, 03:51:02 AM
Tim, go fuck yourself with your :bleeding:

For the last 8 years, you were happily riding the official agit prop bandwagon, despite thousands of people saying that the lack of judicial oversight over Guantanamo opens it up to exactly that sort of abuse. If these allegations are true, they won't be surprising in the slightest.

I bet a fucking cretin like you, if you lived in the 1945 nazi Germany, would show a complete surprise about the Holocaust, too.
I always preferred WWII style military trails to this travesty.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

The Brain

Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 10, 2010, 03:58:58 AM
Quote from: Martinus on April 10, 2010, 03:51:02 AM
Tim, go fuck yourself with your :bleeding:

For the last 8 years, you were happily riding the official agit prop bandwagon, despite thousands of people saying that the lack of judicial oversight over Guantanamo opens it up to exactly that sort of abuse. If these allegations are true, they won't be surprising in the slightest.

I bet a fucking cretin like you, if you lived in the 1945 nazi Germany, would show a complete surprise about the Holocaust, too.
I always preferred WWII style military trails to this travesty.

I guess Ho Chi Minh is right out then. :(
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Agelastus

"Come grow old with me
The Best is yet to be
The last of life for which the first was made."

Admiral Yi

If the central allegation is true I will be very surprised.

The Minsky Moment

The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson

Oexmelin

Was there a blackout of American media ? These allegations had pretty much been reported at least by 2003, from people on the ground.
Que le grand cric me croque !

grumbler

Quote from: Oexmelin on April 11, 2010, 03:59:15 AM
Was there a blackout of American media ? These allegations had pretty much been reported at least by 2003, from people on the ground.
The problem is that pretty much everything possible was reported as actually happening at Guantanamo, bar alien abductions (and maybe those were reported as well).

I would say that these allegations are a bit more credible than the typical "Booshitler" reports that were such staples coming from "on the ground" from 2003 on.  Which isn't to say that the reasonable man didn't know that there were stupid things being done in and about Gitmo, just that a reasonable person would not lightly believe that high government officials would leave themselves open to this kind of revelation.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

Oexmelin

Reports I had seen from 2003 onwards were not quite from the "Booshitler" category. :mellow:
Que le grand cric me croque !