News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Movies you've recently watched

Started by FunkMonk, March 10, 2009, 08:53:46 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

katmai

Quote from: jimmy olsen on May 26, 2009, 09:21:28 AM
Quote from: katmai on May 25, 2009, 09:57:12 PM
William Shatner is Kirk, Starbuck is a man, and Boomer is black, that's all i have to say on that.
How come no one objects to James Bond being recast, but recast Kirk and it's "my childhood's been raped"?

There can be only one.
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son

CountDeMoney

Quote from: Neil on May 26, 2009, 09:24:05 AMStill, the current Bond is inferior to all those who came before him.  He's a Bond for the modern age;  No subtlety or charm, just technological tricks and violence.

Nothing wrong with that.
I for one was tired of Bond flicks being 2 hour episodes of Remington Steele.

Savonarola

#752
Quote from: jimmy olsen on May 26, 2009, 09:21:28 AM
How come no one objects to James Bond being recast, but recast Kirk and it's "my childhood's been raped"?

People still hate George Lazenby.  He lowered expectations to the point that no one will complain no matter who is cast as Bond.
In Italy, for thirty years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love, they had five hundred years of democracy and peace—and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock

BuddhaRhubarb

The Lazenby one makes a great party backdrop video. you can do great MST3000 style commentary tracks of your very own.
:p

Habsburg

Quote from: katmai on May 26, 2009, 03:35:35 PM


There can be only one.

This.

Daniel Craig isn't too hard on the eyes and interesting.  I'm mean, Miss Moore?  :rolleyes:

Sophie Scholl

Richard III, the 1995 Ian McKellan version which made the events set during 1930's Britain a la the more recent Baz Luhrman Romeo + Juliet.  It was definately visually nice, as well as well acted.  Kate Steavenson-Payne was rather attractive as Princess Elizabeth.  I was rather disappointed in the ending though, and how they filmed it out and dragged it on.  The ending was too brief by far and felt rushed, though I think this probably had more to do with budgetary constraints not allowing for a true full on battle.  Overall, it's definately good for a viewing, if only to see the style the infused it with.  I give it... 7 Nazi inspired boar banners out of 10.
"Everything that brought you here -- all the things that made you a prisoner of past sins -- they are gone. Forever and for good. So let the past go... and live."

"Somebody, after all, had to make a start. What we wrote and said is also believed by many others. They just don't dare express themselves as we did."

Habsburg

Quote from: Judas Iscariot on May 27, 2009, 12:33:01 AM
Richard III, the 1995 Ian McKellan version which made the events set during 1930's Britain a la the more recent Baz Luhrman Romeo + Juliet.  It was definately visually nice, as well as well acted.  Kate Steavenson-Payne was rather attractive as Princess Elizabeth.  I was rather disappointed in the ending though, and how they filmed it out and dragged it on.  The ending was too brief by far and felt rushed, though I think this probably had more to do with budgetary constraints not allowing for a true full on battle.  Overall, it's definately good for a viewing, if only to see the style the infused it with.  I give it... 7 Nazi inspired boar banners out of 10.

I loved it.  :D

katmai

I got to meet McKellan because of that film.
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son

Sophie Scholl

Quote from: Habsburg on May 27, 2009, 12:34:14 AM
Quote from: Judas Iscariot on May 27, 2009, 12:33:01 AM
Richard III, the 1995 Ian McKellan version which made the events set during 1930's Britain a la the more recent Baz Luhrman Romeo + Juliet.  It was definately visually nice, as well as well acted.  Kate Steavenson-Payne was rather attractive as Princess Elizabeth.  I was rather disappointed in the ending though, and how they filmed it out and dragged it on.  The ending was too brief by far and felt rushed, though I think this probably had more to do with budgetary constraints not allowing for a true full on battle.  Overall, it's definately good for a viewing, if only to see the style the infused it with.  I give it... 7 Nazi inspired boar banners out of 10.

I loved it.  :D
Shocking I say, shocking!  Visuals and acting trumping script and story?  Impossible sir, you have never previously expressed such ideas and ideals for film! :lol:

Was it simply in passing Kat, or was it a legit meet and greet type thing?  Either way, a nice event.
"Everything that brought you here -- all the things that made you a prisoner of past sins -- they are gone. Forever and for good. So let the past go... and live."

"Somebody, after all, had to make a start. What we wrote and said is also believed by many others. They just don't dare express themselves as we did."

Habsburg

Quote from: katmai on May 27, 2009, 12:35:51 AM
I got to meet McKellan because of that film.

I would give him Best Actor for that performance.  :yes:

Love Kirsten Scott Thomas's Lady Anne and Broadbent's Duke of Buckingham as well.

Syt

I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.

katmai

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son

Sophie Scholl

Quote from: Syt on May 27, 2009, 12:50:50 AM
Did he explain to you what acting is?
That's the second one of those I've seen.  I guess I just don't get them.  They are supposed to be humorous, yes?
"Everything that brought you here -- all the things that made you a prisoner of past sins -- they are gone. Forever and for good. So let the past go... and live."

"Somebody, after all, had to make a start. What we wrote and said is also believed by many others. They just don't dare express themselves as we did."

Sheilbh

Quote from: Judas Iscariot on May 27, 2009, 12:43:53 AM
Shocking I say, shocking!  Visuals and acting trumping script and story?  Impossible sir, you have never previously expressed such ideas and ideals for film! :lol:
I think the scripts pretty well-written :p

I love Kristen Scott-Thomas.  God I love that woman.  She's stunning :wub:
Let's bomb Russia!

Sophie Scholl

Quote from: Sheilbh on May 27, 2009, 02:19:24 AM
I think the scripts pretty well-written :p

I love Kristen Scott-Thomas.  God I love that woman.  She's stunning :wub:
I think I would have liked it better if I hadn't been as familiar with the play and the real events.  Knowing what they cut out and blended bothered me, though they generally pulled it off coherently to the unknowing viewer I should presume.  The end though was just... not good.  The chase and death scene being the biggest offenders, though the falling into the fire was well executed.
"Everything that brought you here -- all the things that made you a prisoner of past sins -- they are gone. Forever and for good. So let the past go... and live."

"Somebody, after all, had to make a start. What we wrote and said is also believed by many others. They just don't dare express themselves as we did."