News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

NCAA 2009

Started by Ed Anger, April 04, 2009, 01:36:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Valmy

Big 10 wants to expand to become Big 12 part deux.

Considering taking shitty Big 12 school Missouri: http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_saturday/post/The-Big-Ten-wants-to-expand-at-last-But-to-whe?urn=ncaaf,208264#remaining-content

If they take them off our hands I say we throw in Iowa State as a two-fer.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

MadImmortalMan

Hoo boy. It won't be Mizzou. The only one that totally makes sense is Notre Dame, but they won't join.
"Stability is destabilizing." --Hyman Minsky

"Complacency can be a self-denying prophecy."
"We have nothing to fear but lack of fear itself." --Larry Summers

Eddie Teach

Quote from: Valmy on December 14, 2009, 12:43:48 PM
So you are telling the fact the East voted for Ingram is proof that it was not East Coast bias?  This is not quite on Gino Torreta over Marshall Faulk levels of East Coast bias but it was pretty bad.

I think there was regional bias everywhere, including the West, but I don't think that's the main thing that won Ingram votes in Chicago or Philly. Though considering how close it was, any factor contributing votes to Ingram *could* be labeled decisive, I think the teams' records is the one I'd choose.
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

Berkut

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on December 14, 2009, 01:57:48 PM
Quote from: Valmy on December 14, 2009, 12:43:48 PM
So you are telling the fact the East voted for Ingram is proof that it was not East Coast bias?  This is not quite on Gino Torreta over Marshall Faulk levels of East Coast bias but it was pretty bad.

I think there was regional bias everywhere, including the West, but I don't think that's the main thing that won Ingram votes in Chicago or Philly. Though considering how close it was, any factor contributing votes to Ingram *could* be labeled decisive, I think the teams' records is the one I'd choose.

I always find the "teams record" thing rather stupid when it comes to individual awards.

If you are comparing stats, and one players stats are better than the others, but the other was on a better team....doesn't that actually say a lot more for the guy who was NOT on the #1 overall team in the country?

Of course the real reason is that Gerhart is from the West. Nothing to do with anything other than that - it's not like it was any secret how good he was out here, although of course the press did not notice him until they could no longer ignore him.
"If you think this has a happy ending, then you haven't been paying attention."

select * from users where clue > 0
0 rows returned

Admiral Yi

If I had a vote I would have a hard time giving it to a guy named Toby.

Eddie Teach

Quote from: Berkut on December 14, 2009, 02:10:48 PM
I always find the "teams record" thing rather stupid when it comes to individual awards.

If you are comparing stats, and one players stats are better than the others, but the other was on a better team....doesn't that actually say a lot more for the guy who was NOT on the #1 overall team in the country?

I'm not sure the team records say much either way. Alabama's defense was a hell of a lot better than Stanford's, and that has nothing to do with Ingram and Gerhart. But it's the kind of thing voters latch on to.
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

grumbler

Quote from: Berkut on December 14, 2009, 02:10:48 PM
I always find the "teams record" thing rather stupid when it comes to individual awards.

If you are comparing stats, and one players stats are better than the others, but the other was on a better team....doesn't that actually say a lot more for the guy who was NOT on the #1 overall team in the country?

Of course the real reason is that Gerhart is from the West. Nothing to do with anything other than that - it's not like it was any secret how good he was out here, although of course the press did not notice him until they could no longer ignore him.
Agree, but would also add that West Coast players have won Heisman trophies before.  In this case, i would argue that the fact that Gerhart was playing for a team traditionally seen as a patsy that hurt the most.  Had he been playing for Northwestern, he would have faced the same problem (i.e. "if he was really that good, why didn't a good team land him?")
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

grumbler

Jim Harbaugh staying at Stanford through 2014
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ap-t25-stanford-harbaugh&prov=ap&type=lgns

:cheers:  I reckon we know of at least one school whose offer he can, by contract, accept in spite of this deal.  Stanford gets better next year, and they stash my choice to run the Michigan program for another year.  That is win-win, baby!
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

MadImmortalMan

Quote from: grumbler on December 14, 2009, 02:28:47 PM
Jim Harbaugh staying at Stanford through 2014
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ap-t25-stanford-harbaugh&prov=ap&type=lgns

:cheers:  I reckon we know of at least one school whose offer he can, by contract, accept in spite of this deal.  Stanford gets better next year, and they stash my choice to run the Michigan program for another year.  That is win-win, baby!

The flaw in your plan is that RichRod has to languish and continue to be bad, thus failing to redeem himself.
"Stability is destabilizing." --Hyman Minsky

"Complacency can be a self-denying prophecy."
"We have nothing to fear but lack of fear itself." --Larry Summers

Ed Anger

Quote from: Valmy on December 14, 2009, 01:33:13 PM
Big 10 wants to expand to become Big 12 part deux.

Considering taking shitty Big 12 school Missouri: http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_saturday/post/The-Big-Ten-wants-to-expand-at-last-But-to-whe?urn=ncaaf,208264#remaining-content

If they take them off our hands I say we throw in Iowa State as a two-fer.

As long as they don't raid the MAC, it might be okay.

I won't like the GAME not being the end all, be all in the conference as it usually is.
Stay Alive...Let the Man Drive

MadImmortalMan

Quote from: MadImmortalMan on December 14, 2009, 01:39:34 PM
Hoo boy. It won't be Mizzou. The only one that totally makes sense is Notre Dame, but they won't join.

Actually, Pitt might kinda make sense as a rival for Penn State.
"Stability is destabilizing." --Hyman Minsky

"Complacency can be a self-denying prophecy."
"We have nothing to fear but lack of fear itself." --Larry Summers

Valmy

Locker staying for his senior year at Washington: http://washington.scout.com/2/929008.html
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Berkut

Quote from: Valmy on December 14, 2009, 04:39:46 PM
Locker staying for his senior year at Washington: http://washington.scout.com/2/929008.html

Wow. Can't say I blame him, but on the other hand, it seems very foolish.
"If you think this has a happy ending, then you haven't been paying attention."

select * from users where clue > 0
0 rows returned

katmai

Quote from: Berkut on December 14, 2009, 04:51:59 PM
Quote from: Valmy on December 14, 2009, 04:39:46 PM
Locker staying for his senior year at Washington: http://washington.scout.com/2/929008.html

Wow. Can't say I blame him, but on the other hand, it seems very foolish.

He likes playing in college, he already has a pro contract with the Angels, so i'm sure can afford to take out a fat insurance policy. It will be a very interesting season in 2010 for Huskies, as they only lose two of the starting 11 on Offense. (Fullback and one OL)
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son

grumbler

Quote from: MadImmortalMan on December 14, 2009, 02:55:50 PM
The flaw in your plan is that RichRod has to languish and continue to be bad, thus failing to redeem himself.
How is that a flaw?  It is just a fact.  This year's Michigan team was no better than last year's, it just had an easier schedule.  RichRod appears to completely lack any talent for actual coaching (though I don't question that he is a smart guy who knows the theory cold).
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!