NJ girl, 14, arrested after posting nude pics

Started by garbon, March 27, 2009, 08:44:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

jimmy olsen

Quote from: Admiral Yi on March 27, 2009, 04:24:41 PM
Quote from: The Nickname Who Was Thursday on March 27, 2009, 04:20:58 PM
First time I've ever seen the expression. :mellow:
Same for me.  I would have called it something like lynch mob psychology.
That phrase has been used tons of times here. There's no way you haven't seen it before.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

Admiral Yi

Quote from: jimmy olsen on March 27, 2009, 04:30:20 PM
That phrase has been used tons of times here. There's no way you haven't seen it before.
Way!

jimmy olsen

Quote from: Admiral Yi on March 27, 2009, 04:31:07 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on March 27, 2009, 04:30:20 PM
That phrase has been used tons of times here. There's no way you haven't seen it before.
Way!
It's more likely that you simply don't remember.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

Admiral Yi

Quote from: jimmy olsen on March 27, 2009, 04:41:04 PM
It's more likely that you simply don't remember.
Or that I didn't bother with the 300 threads on child molestation or porn or gaybuttseks or whatever that mentioned it.

Siege

Quote from: Ed Anger on March 27, 2009, 09:57:53 AM
Quote from: DisturbedPervert on March 27, 2009, 09:52:03 AM
Quote from: Ed Anger on March 27, 2009, 09:16:12 AM

Works for me. I told my goddaughter I'd rip the nuts off her boyfriend if he did anything to her.

You need to be telling that to the boyfriend, not the girl.

I meet her boyfriends. I administer the tests to determine their moral fiber. I judge their worthiness.

Boyfriends? In plural?
What is this world coming to.

And about the sexting thing, yeah, prosecute the bastards, and their parents for not supervising what their children are doing.



"All men are created equal, then some become infantry."

"Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't."

"Laissez faire et laissez passer, le monde va de lui même!"


Neil

Quote from: Siege on March 27, 2009, 07:13:37 PM
Boyfriends? In plural?
What is this world coming to.
Modernity, you third-world fuck.
I do not hate you, nor do I love you, but you are made out of atoms which I can use for something else.

Neil

Still, Siegebreaker provides a good example of how laws like this happen.  He cries out loudly against this sort of thing in an effort to mask the fact that he's a child-rapist himself.
I do not hate you, nor do I love you, but you are made out of atoms which I can use for something else.

The Brain

Didn't we talk about this already?

Anyway, America's failure gets worse every day.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

dps

I love the irony that they won't release the name of the 14-year old mentioned in the OP because she's a juvenile, but they might make her register as a sex offender.


DontSayBanana

What I want to know is how you charge a 14-year-old with exploiting... herself? No party benefits exploitatively. Sounds to me like there's some loopholes in the code here that need to be patched before a ton of prosecutors abuse them, en masse. :blink:

PS - North Jersey. Ugh. At least in South Jersey, the majority of the BS is restricted to the immediate Camden area. Seems like most of North Jersey suffers from Newark-taint, at least on the eastern side. I couldn't comment on the northwest.
Experience bij!

DGuller

Quote from: DontSayBanana on March 28, 2009, 12:43:45 AM
What I want to know is how you charge a 14-year-old with exploiting... herself? No party benefits exploitatively. Sounds to me like there's some loopholes in the code here that need to be patched before a ton of prosecutors abuse them, en masse. :blink:
I think the justification is that the existence of child pornography creates a danger for all children, by making some sick people lust them.  Therefore, everyone who has something to do with putting it out there is a bad, bad person.

DontSayBanana

Quote from: DGuller on March 28, 2009, 01:13:41 AM
I think the justification is that the existence of child pornography creates a danger for all children, by making some sick people lust them.  Therefore, everyone who has something to do with putting it out there is a bad, bad person.
I understand that to be the rationale, but it still sucks. She can't be both the perp and the vic; if she's the perpetrator, then you're going to impose Megan's Law on a victimless crime, which is over-the-top excessive. If she's the victim, then there should be some kind of protection against "class traitor" punitive actions. It feels like this should be treated at most as endangerment of a minor, and most likely as a subset of exhibitionism.
Experience bij!