News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Dystopian Motif in British Cinema/Art

Started by Martinus, September 30, 2009, 03:54:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Martinus

Although I agree that perhaps my claim that this is more of a British than an American phenomenon was a bit of an exaggeration. I mean, I just thought of X-Files. Still, if the show was British, the heroes would probably be the people running away from Moulder and Scully. :P

I Killed Kenny

Japanese also have a very dystopian fiction.

When you think about both nations they are very similar. Both Islands that one time in history was pretty much destroyed (WWII) I believe those were very dystopians moments that are still in those nations imagination

Agelastus

:childish grumble:

So it looks as if people are starting to suggest that it goes back to the traumas and increased restrictions of the world wars in comparison to the pre-war world.

As I suggested...

:childish grumble:
"Come grow old with me
The Best is yet to be
The last of life for which the first was made."

Eddie Teach

Quote from: Queequeg on September 30, 2009, 04:24:59 PM
*WHO THE FUCK CAST NATALIE PORTMAN? V IS OBSESSED WITH MUSICALS, HAS A BITING, CAUSTIC WIT AND DRESSES FABULOUSLY IN A DRESS: HOW THE FUCK DID THEY HAVE STEPHEN FRY IN IT, AND NOT CAST HIM AS THE BRILLIANT, SARCASTIC, VERY OBVIOUSLY GAY SUPER HERO?!?!?!?!

Cause they wanted to sell tickets. :mellow:
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

Queequeg

Quote from: Martinus on September 30, 2009, 04:59:58 PM

Yeah I guess you are right (btw, you are familiar, I hope, with "Master and Margaret" by Bulkhakov? It's one of the best books ever written - of course in case of Russia, if you want to set your story in a dystopian totalitarian world, you just describe reality ;)).

I just think that this is more pronounced in British cinema, perhaps because these topics resonate better with the fears of the public.
Master and Margarita is in my top 5 favorite novels, together with Dead Souls. 

Yeah.  Russia ended up inventing modern Distopianism becaus it wasn't so much a fiction as the unfortunate reality.   :lol:
Quote from: PDH on April 25, 2009, 05:58:55 PM
"Dysthymia?  Did they get some student from the University of Chicago with a hard-on for ancient Bactrian cities to name this?  I feel cheated."

jimmy olsen

Quote from: Queequeg on September 30, 2009, 05:35:28 PM
Quote from: Martinus on September 30, 2009, 04:59:58 PM

Yeah I guess you are right (btw, you are familiar, I hope, with "Master and Margaret" by Bulkhakov? It's one of the best books ever written - of course in case of Russia, if you want to set your story in a dystopian totalitarian world, you just describe reality ;)).

I just think that this is more pronounced in British cinema, perhaps because these topics resonate better with the fears of the public.
Master and Margarita is in my top 5 favorite novels, together with Dead Souls. 

Yeah.  Russia ended up inventing modern Distopianism becaus it wasn't so much a fiction as the unfortunate reality.   :lol:
As "We" Zamyatin demonstrates.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

grumbler

I would point out, Marti, that British dystopianism goes back much further than so far stated.  The Morlocks and Eloi, after all, were Britain's future in The Time Machine, and that was written in 1895...
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

Neil

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on September 30, 2009, 05:31:19 PM
Quote from: Queequeg on September 30, 2009, 04:24:59 PM
*WHO THE FUCK CAST NATALIE PORTMAN? V IS OBSESSED WITH MUSICALS, HAS A BITING, CAUSTIC WIT AND DRESSES FABULOUSLY IN A DRESS: HOW THE FUCK DID THEY HAVE STEPHEN FRY IN IT, AND NOT CAST HIM AS THE BRILLIANT, SARCASTIC, VERY OBVIOUSLY GAY SUPER HERO?!?!?!?!

Cause they wanted to sell tickets. :mellow:
An interesting point:  Nobody likes gays.
I do not hate you, nor do I love you, but you are made out of atoms which I can use for something else.

Agelastus

Quote from: grumbler on September 30, 2009, 06:55:26 PM
I would point out, Marti, that British dystopianism goes back much further than so far stated.  The Morlocks and Eloi, after all, were Britain's future in The Time Machine, and that was written in 1895...

Dystopianism goes a loooong way back in British literature; there's dystopic elements in Gulliver's Travels, as far as I am concerned.

"Police state" dystopia's relatively new though. It only really got going after WWII.
"Come grow old with me
The Best is yet to be
The last of life for which the first was made."

dps

Quote from: Martinus on September 30, 2009, 04:59:58 PM

I just think that this is more pronounced in British cinema, perhaps because these topics resonate better with the fears of the public.

Or perhaps they resonate better with the fears of the film industry in Britian, rather than the public?

BuddhaRhubarb

Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 30, 2009, 04:20:03 PM
V for Vendetta was a transparent attack on Bush's faith based fanaticism.

written in the early mid 80's? odd.
:p

Admiral Yi

Quote from: BuddhaRhubarb on September 30, 2009, 09:21:55 PM
written in the early mid 80's? odd.
I was tricked by the thread title into thinking we were discussing movies. :(

BuddhaRhubarb

Quote from: Admiral Yi on September 30, 2009, 09:34:07 PM
Quote from: BuddhaRhubarb on September 30, 2009, 09:21:55 PM
written in the early mid 80's? odd.
I was tricked by the thread title into thinking we were discussing movies. :(

well the movie is based on the book.... if they turned it into an anti bush thing they didn't get it. Bush is no Thatcher, not by a long shot.
:p

Martinus

Quote from: dps on September 30, 2009, 07:57:59 PM
Quote from: Martinus on September 30, 2009, 04:59:58 PM

I just think that this is more pronounced in British cinema, perhaps because these topics resonate better with the fears of the public.

Or perhaps they resonate better with the fears of the film industry in Britian, rather than the public?
Don't think so. I may be wrong about this, but I think in Britain the "film industry" is not some isolated "dreamworks" machine like Hollywood, so the topics it raises are connected much more with the British public.

Sheilbh

I'd add 'Children of Men', which is possibly not a British film but is based on a P.D. James novel and the pretty dreary 'State of Denmark'.
Let's bomb Russia!