US - Greenland Crisis Thread

[grumbler]

Is JD Vance lawless when he states, contrary to law, that ICE agents have "absolute immunity?"

The woman who was assaulted in her car while trying to get to her doctor was not lawless.  She was never charged with anything.  Where her assailants lawless? Vance says it doesn't matter because they are immune to the law.

[Zoupa]

Joan described lawless (at least as it relates to Trump) as engaging in a lot action that he knows will be reversed by the courts.  I had no objection.

Wearing masks and not wearing name tags is institutional and deliberate.  So what?

Did your WSJ article offer any breakdown on unjustified and unjustified shootings?

They exercise police powers but do not follow their restrictions. Due process is systematically ignored. Lawlessness.

[Admiral Yi]

They exercise police powers but do not follow their restrictions. Due process is systematically ignored. Lawlessness.

Example please.  Example please.

[bogh]

Your country is beset by state sponsored armed thugs shooting people and this is your concern?

I have more than one concern. Don't you?

Except for the words "country" "armed" and "shooting" the rest is narrative and myth making.

🥳

MAGA party line compliance achieved! Congrats. 🎈

Maybe try applying the standards you apply to stories about ICE to the stories about protestors and vice versa.

[Admiral Yi]

🥳

MAGA party line compliance achieved! Congrats. 🎈

Maybe try applying the standards you apply to stories about ICE to the stories about protestors and vice versa.

boring

[Tamas]

🥳

MAGA party line compliance achieved! Congrats. 🎈

Maybe try applying the standards you apply to stories about ICE to the stories about protestors and vice versa.

boring

A good point though. You take complaints about protesters at face value, but refuse to entertain the notion that ICE may be overstepping their legal boundaries. You may convince yourself thst you are impartial but you are far from it.

[Admiral Yi]

A good point though. You take complaints about protesters at face value, but refuse to entertain the notion that ICE may be overstepping their legal boundaries. You may convince yourself thst you are impartial but you are far from it.

How do you  know how I take complaints about protesters? How do you know how I entertain the notion that ICE may be overstepping their boundaries? That's narrative. You make things up and get angry about them.

[bogh]

How do you  know how I take complaints about protesters? How do you know how I entertain the notion that ICE may be overstepping their boundaries?

By reading your posts when you write about it? Obviously you may have other opinions in reality and just be cosplaying MAGA drone? Are you?

[Tamas]

A good point though. You take complaints about protesters at face value, but refuse to entertain the notion that ICE may be overstepping their legal boundaries. You may convince yourself thst you are impartial but you are far from it.

How do you  know how I take complaints about protesters? How do you know how I entertain the notion that ICE may be overstepping their boundaries? That's narrative. You make things up and get angry about them.

You are upset about protester behaviour (such as cursing at ICE) but demonstrate a nonchalant attitude about well-documented ICE brutality.

I use this observation to conclude your stance on the matter. I obviously can be wrong, but that is the picture your posts are painting.

[The Brain]

ICE discussion fits better in the Trump thread?

[Crazy_Ivan80]

Getting Monoriu vibes, tbh.
Though I may be misremembering