What does a TRUMP presidency look like?

[Valmy]

If you believe White people are naturally superior to other people.

Ah I see... I think another popular definition is "if you think society should be structured to primarily benefit white people".

I don't think any white supremacists would think of it that way. Probably not an accurate definition.

[Malthus]

If you believe White people are naturally superior to other people.

Ah I see... I think another popular definition is "if you think society should be structured to primarily benefit white people".

Wouldn't a White Supremacist have to, by definition, believe that White people are better than non-White people, and therefore ought to dominate over them?

The definition you have provided, seems to  me, goes for any ethnic or tribal chauvinist, even if they believed people in their particular ethnicity or tribe weren't "superior" to others.     

[Barrister]

If you believe White people are naturally superior to other people.

Ah I see... I think another popular definition is "if you think society should be structured to primarily benefit white people".

I don't think much of that definition.

If that's your definition, and you believe that society is already structured to primarily benefit white people, then viola!  Anyone who believes in the status quo can be dismissed as a white supremacist.

[garbon]

If you believe White people are naturally superior to other people.

Ah I see... I think another popular definition is "if you think society should be structured to primarily benefit white people".

I don't think much of that definition.

If that's your definition, and you believe that society is already structured to primarily benefit white people, then viola!  Anyone who believes in the status quo can be dismissed as a white supremacist.

Well if you believe that the racist status quo should be kept than yeah that's kinda racist.

[Syt]

Donald J. Trump‏
@realDonaldTrump

IN AMERICA WE DON'T WORSHIP GOVERNMENT - WE WORSHIP GOD! http://45.wh.gov/POTUSInsta

[Barrister]

If you believe White people are naturally superior to other people.

Ah I see... I think another popular definition is "if you think society should be structured to primarily benefit white people".

I don't think much of that definition.

If that's your definition, and you believe that society is already structured to primarily benefit white people, then viola!  Anyone who believes in the status quo can be dismissed as a white supremacist.

Well if you believe that the racist status quo should be kept than yeah that's kinda racist.

But I don't think the status quo is generally racist.

[grumbler]

Well if you believe that the racist status quo should be kept than yeah that's kinda racist.

Who believes that the racist elements of the status quo should be retained?  "Status quo" is far more complex than a simplistic "racist/non-racist" divide can express.

[garbon]

Well if you believe that the racist status quo should be kept than yeah that's kinda racist.

Who believes that the racist elements of the status quo should be retained?  "Status quo" is far more complex than a simplistic "racist/non-racist" divide can express.

Not sure why you are replying to me with that.

[garbon]

If you believe White people are naturally superior to other people.

Ah I see... I think another popular definition is "if you think society should be structured to primarily benefit white people".

I don't think much of that definition.

If that's your definition, and you believe that society is already structured to primarily benefit white people, then viola!  Anyone who believes in the status quo can be dismissed as a white supremacist.

Well if you believe that the racist status quo should be kept than yeah that's kinda racist.

But I don't think the status quo is generally racist.

Well that's a post that says basically nothing.

[grumbler]

Well if you believe that the racist status quo should be kept than yeah that's kinda racist.

Who believes that the racist elements of the status quo should be retained?  "Status quo" is far more complex than a simplistic "racist/non-racist" divide can express.

Not sure why you are replying to me with that.

I'm okay with that.

[Savonarola]

Donald J. Trump‏
@realDonaldTrump

IN AMERICA WE DON'T WORSHIP GOVERNMENT - WE WORSHIP GOD! http://45.wh.gov/POTUSInsta

Zeus, n. The chief of Grecian gods, adored by the Romans as Jupiter and by the modern Americans as God, Gold, Mob and Dog. Some explorers who have touched upon the shores of America, and one who professes to have penetrated a considerable distance to the interior, have thought that these four names stand for as many distinct deities, but in his monumental work on Surviving Faiths, Frumpp insists that the natives are monotheists, each having no other god than himself, whom he worships under many sacred names.

-Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"

[Oexmelin]

But I don't think the status quo is generally racist.

What would it take to convince you otherwise?

[Barrister]

But I don't think the status quo is generally racist.

What would it take to convince you otherwise?

Whadda ya got?

[Oexmelin]

Everything, really. I genuinely want to know what your criteria are, because it would be a waste to just hurl data that are not liable to convince you.

[The Minsky Moment]

It's pretty incontestable that the status quo is one where their is material and significant diversion in outcomes based on race: income, wealth, positions of power and authority, and so on. 
So the challenge of the no racism hypothesis is to explain how one reaches such outcomes in the absence of racism.