News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

What does a TRUMP presidency look like?

Started by FunkMonk, November 08, 2016, 11:02:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Admiral Yi

Quote from: viper37 on February 14, 2025, 09:24:03 PMThe target is 2% of GDP and of that 2%, 20% must be for equipment expenditures.

23 NATO countries meet both targets. France UK, Germany are there.  These are the countries that are likely to participate in a bombing operation somewhere.  Canada, Belgium and Italy are the real offenders here.

Some recent members need some leeway before they reach their target, but they are working on it.

Some other countries have face hard economic times in a not so distant past, and contrary to the US, they can not go into huge deficits year after year for the fun of it.  The European union has strict rules, and only emergencies will authorize countries to go into deficit.  Covid was one such emergency. 

You will please to know that they are now discussing another emergency situation for their defense budget since Russia is preparing for war next year, now that the USA has betrayed all of us, and leaked its own nuclear secrets online.

I am glad you did not vote Trump.  I would be happier if you stopped using his silly rhetoric.



I will concede most members are not free riding now if you will concede that almost all were  free riding until very recently and that several member leaders made multiple false statements about their commitments.

Free riding is not silly Trumpian rhetoric.  It's an academic term used in scholarly publications.

Tonitrus

Quote from: The Minsky Moment on February 14, 2025, 09:50:36 PM
Quote from: Zoupa on February 14, 2025, 04:46:43 PMWhy is the US Army tagging musk? It's like you idiots decided to do a fascist oligarchy speedrun or something.

The abandonment of the name Liberty is icing on the irony cake

Fort Liberty was an easy target because of its notoriety and generic name, and lets them claim a "win" and call it settled.  Most of the other bases were more sensibly named after other American war heroes; Eisenhower, Cavazos, Moore (this one was praised by Mel Gibson...thus extra protection :P ), and I would be more surprised if those were reverted.

Razgovory

Quote from: Valmy on February 14, 2025, 11:08:32 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on February 14, 2025, 05:25:15 PMI was just repeating what sophie told me.  She wanted me in a camp.

She did not you fucking liar. She said she would be in a camp and when you are shipped to it, she would greet you.

Seedy told me to go kill myself about 400 times and you melt down from that weak sauce?
I took that as she wanted me in a camp.  I'm not upset, I'm just disappointed.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

grumbler

Quote from: Valmy on February 14, 2025, 11:02:03 PMI can't believe they changed the name back to Fort Bragg, if Bragg was a US General his name would live in infamy forever as a disgrace to the service. But when you are a Confederate General incompetence is celebrated. Though I guess he did help the US win.

Oh, no.  The icing on the cake is that they expect us to believe that they did this to honor a previously-unknown WW2 soldier who just happened to be named Bragg. This is grade-school stuff.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

The Brain

Quote from: Barrister on February 14, 2025, 05:07:38 PM
Quote from: The Brain on February 14, 2025, 04:53:07 PMThat a Russian conventional attack on Western Europe would be feeble enough to be resisted by European forces alone didn't become apparent until 2022.

OK fair enough.  In 2022 nobody expects the Russians to come streaming through the Fulda Gap.

But the concern in 2025, or at least after the Russians have some time to rebuild, is not a full drive to the centre of Europe - but a lightning strike on the Baltics.

There I'm not as sure it could be resisted before Tallinin or maybe Riga fall - and then what does Europe do - a concentrated effort to drive the Russians out - in particular without US support if it comes to that?

My view is that if the US withdrew conventional forces from Europe but maintained its nuclear umbrella over Europe, then the US would still be the primary guarantor of security in Europe. And that if the US withdraws its nuclear umbrella, then conventional forces will not make it the primary guarantor of security in Europe.

Of course, it could be argued that in a practical sense the umbrella was withdrawn already during Trump 1. My guess is that European governments largely ignored this instead of looking at creating actual security for Europe.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

grumbler

Quote from: Razgovory on February 14, 2025, 05:25:15 PMI was just repeating what sophie told me.  She wanted me in a camp.

Do you really think that repeating this lie will convince us to believe it?
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

HisMajestyBOB

Quote from: grumbler on February 15, 2025, 09:06:38 AM
Quote from: Razgovory on February 14, 2025, 05:25:15 PMI was just repeating what sophie told me.  She wanted me in a camp.

Do you really think that repeating this lie will convince us to believe it?

That approach did work on almost 50% of voters.  :(
Three lovely Prada points for HoI2 help

viper37

Quote from: Admiral Yi on February 14, 2025, 11:10:10 PM
Quote from: viper37 on February 14, 2025, 09:24:03 PMThe target is 2% of GDP and of that 2%, 20% must be for equipment expenditures.

23 NATO countries meet both targets. France UK, Germany are there.  These are the countries that are likely to participate in a bombing operation somewhere.  Canada, Belgium and Italy are the real offenders here.

Some recent members need some leeway before they reach their target, but they are working on it.

Some other countries have face hard economic times in a not so distant past, and contrary to the US, they can not go into huge deficits year after year for the fun of it.  The European union has strict rules, and only emergencies will authorize countries to go into deficit.  Covid was one such emergency. 

You will please to know that they are now discussing another emergency situation for their defense budget since Russia is preparing for war next year, now that the USA has betrayed all of us, and leaked its own nuclear secrets online.

I am glad you did not vote Trump.  I would be happier if you stopped using his silly rhetoric.



I will concede most members are not free riding now if you will concede that almost all were  free riding until very recently and that several member leaders made multiple false statements about their commitments.

Free riding is not silly Trumpian rhetoric.  It's an academic term used in scholarly publications.
Shit happens in life.

You plan for something, other things happen, it requires more time than you expect.
I don't do meditation.  I drink alcohol to relax, like normal people.

If Microsoft Excel decided to stop working overnight, the world would practically end.

garbon

Quote from: viper37 on February 15, 2025, 09:24:54 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on February 14, 2025, 11:10:10 PM
Quote from: viper37 on February 14, 2025, 09:24:03 PMThe target is 2% of GDP and of that 2%, 20% must be for equipment expenditures.

23 NATO countries meet both targets. France UK, Germany are there.  These are the countries that are likely to participate in a bombing operation somewhere.  Canada, Belgium and Italy are the real offenders here.

Some recent members need some leeway before they reach their target, but they are working on it.

Some other countries have face hard economic times in a not so distant past, and contrary to the US, they can not go into huge deficits year after year for the fun of it.  The European union has strict rules, and only emergencies will authorize countries to go into deficit.  Covid was one such emergency. 

You will please to know that they are now discussing another emergency situation for their defense budget since Russia is preparing for war next year, now that the USA has betrayed all of us, and leaked its own nuclear secrets online.

I am glad you did not vote Trump.  I would be happier if you stopped using his silly rhetoric.



I will concede most members are not free riding now if you will concede that almost all were  free riding until very recently and that several member leaders made multiple false statements about their commitments.

Free riding is not silly Trumpian rhetoric.  It's an academic term used in scholarly publications.
Shit happens in life.

You plan for something, other things happen, it requires more time than you expect.


Okay and people can fairly call you out, no?
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

viper37

Quote from: garbon on February 15, 2025, 09:27:22 AM
Quote from: viper37 on February 15, 2025, 09:24:54 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on February 14, 2025, 11:10:10 PM
Quote from: viper37 on February 14, 2025, 09:24:03 PMThe target is 2% of GDP and of that 2%, 20% must be for equipment expenditures.

23 NATO countries meet both targets. France UK, Germany are there.  These are the countries that are likely to participate in a bombing operation somewhere.  Canada, Belgium and Italy are the real offenders here.

Some recent members need some leeway before they reach their target, but they are working on it.

Some other countries have face hard economic times in a not so distant past, and contrary to the US, they can not go into huge deficits year after year for the fun of it.  The European union has strict rules, and only emergencies will authorize countries to go into deficit.  Covid was one such emergency. 

You will please to know that they are now discussing another emergency situation for their defense budget since Russia is preparing for war next year, now that the USA has betrayed all of us, and leaked its own nuclear secrets online.

I am glad you did not vote Trump.  I would be happier if you stopped using his silly rhetoric.



I will concede most members are not free riding now if you will concede that almost all were  free riding until very recently and that several member leaders made multiple false statements about their commitments.

Free riding is not silly Trumpian rhetoric.  It's an academic term used in scholarly publications.
Shit happens in life.

You plan for something, other things happen, it requires more time than you expect.


Okay and people can fairly call you out, no?
Canada has no excuses.

The European situation has been well explained by Dist and Minsky.

When America gets called on its lack of commitments toward its obligations, I couldn't help but notice a certain... jingoism in the past, from certain members.  Some involved in this discussion.

But like I said, defense requires money.  If America slaps tariffs and doesn't pull its weight elsewhere forcing other countries to do triple the work, it has consequences elsewhere.
I don't do meditation.  I drink alcohol to relax, like normal people.

If Microsoft Excel decided to stop working overnight, the world would practically end.

The Brain

#35755
As a matter of urgency Sweden has to stop sharing military information with the US. Not only is the US commander-in-chief a supporter of Russia, many in the US military vote Republican and have to be assumed to leak everything they know to Daddy Putin.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

HVC

I guess it's a good thing the USSR never thought of bribing GOP politicians directly, rather than just planting spies and agents.
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

The Brain

If the Nato treaty had included a requirement for military assistance to a fellow member under attack, then Sweden would have to leave Nato ASAP. But luckily that's not the case.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Grey Fox

Quote from: The Brain on February 15, 2025, 02:41:07 PMIf the Nato treaty had included a requirement for military assistance to a fellow member under attack, then Sweden would have to leave Nato ASAP. But luckily that's not the case.

Why?
Colonel Caliga is Awesome.

The Brain

Quote from: Grey Fox on February 15, 2025, 03:11:25 PM
Quote from: The Brain on February 15, 2025, 02:41:07 PMIf the Nato treaty had included a requirement for military assistance to a fellow member under attack, then Sweden would have to leave Nato ASAP. But luckily that's not the case.

Why?

We don't want to be in a position where we have to defend Trump and his shitshow of a country.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.