News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

What does a TRUMP presidency look like?

Started by FunkMonk, November 08, 2016, 11:02:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jacob

Quote from: Barrister on March 05, 2021, 10:49:17 AM
I do love how Trump attacks Mitch McConnell for being more willing to fight Trump than Pelosi et al.  All in a letter that spends 100% of it's time attacking fellow Republicans.

Don't cross Il Douche.

The Brain

Quote from: Razgovory on March 05, 2021, 08:38:58 AM
Karl Rove was not qualified for 5G?  What the hell does any of this mean?

You are dealing with a disturbed brain.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Jacob

Quote from: The Brain on March 05, 2021, 11:09:54 AM
Quote from: Razgovory on March 05, 2021, 08:38:58 AM
Karl Rove was not qualified for 5G?  What the hell does any of this mean?

You are dealing with a disturbed brain.

Someone disturbed you?

The nerve!

The Brain

Quote from: Jacob on March 05, 2021, 11:11:12 AM
Quote from: The Brain on March 05, 2021, 11:09:54 AM
Quote from: Razgovory on March 05, 2021, 08:38:58 AM
Karl Rove was not qualified for 5G?  What the hell does any of this mean?

You are dealing with a disturbed brain.

Someone disturbed you?

The nerve!

My neighbors smash a lot.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Eddie Teach

To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

Savonarola

Quote from: Razgovory on March 05, 2021, 08:38:58 AM
Karl Rove was not qualified for 5G?  What the hell does any of this mean?

From what I can piece together, Rove had lobbied for a company which wanted to lease spectrum assigned to the Department of Defense in order to build a 5G network.  Most of this spectrum is unused in most locations; and they had some sort of cognitive radio technology that could switch their radios to a different band if the DOD needed it.

We do something like this in Europe; a transport band we use shares spectrum with military radar.  When we detect radar our radios change to a different channel.
In Italy, for thirty years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love, they had five hundred years of democracy and peace—and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock

Jacob


The Minsky Moment

There needs to be a new word for it.  Trumpenschadenfreude.
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson

Jacob

The FBI releases video of a suspect planting pipebombs at the DNC and RNC headquarters the night before the coup attempt: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/fbi-releases-new-video-suspect-planting-bombs-capitol-riot-n1260293

Syt

https://twitter.com/ScottforFlorida/status/1370436106597060618

QuoteRick Scott
@ScottforFlorida

Great meeting with President Trump last night!

We are all focused on winning back the Senate majority in 2022 and saving our country from the radical policies of today's Democrat Party.


Two very natural and unforced smiles.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.

The Minsky Moment

Love the faux Turkish Harem style architecture.
The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.
--Joan Robinson

HVC

Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

Admiral Yi


The Larch

Has the "What I say is so obviously BS that it shouldn't really be taken into account" line of defence ever worked in court?

QuotePro-Trump lawyer says 'no reasonable person' would believe her election lies
Lawyers for Sidney Powell argued conspiracies she laid out constituted legally protected first amendment speech

A key member of the legal team that sought to steal the 2020 election for Donald Trump is defending herself against a billion-dollar defamation lawsuit by arguing that "no reasonable person" could have mistaken her wild claims about election fraud last November as statements of fact.

In a motion to dismiss a complaint by the large US-based voting machine company Dominion, lawyers for Sidney Powell argued that elaborate conspiracies she laid out on television and radio last November while simultaneously suing to overturn election results in four states constituted legally protected first amendment speech.

"No reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact," argued lawyers for Powell, a former federal prosecutor from Texas who caught Trump's attention through her involvement in the defense of his former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

Powell falsely stated on television and in legal briefs that Dominion machines ran on technology that could switch votes away from Trump, technology she said had been invented in Venezuela to help steal elections for the late Hugo Chávez.

Those lies were built on empty claims that apparently originated in anonymous comments on a pro-Trump blog, only to be amplified on a global scale by Trump himself in a 12 November tweet in which he wrote in part "REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE."

Citing lost business and reputational damage, Dominion filed a $1.3bn defamation lawsuit against Powell and her colleague on Trump's legal team, Rudy Giuliani. A Dominion employee separately sued the Trump campaign after receiving death threats.

Thousands of Trump supporters stormed the US Capitol on 6 January in an effort to stop the certification of an election they considered invalid, killing a police officer in violent clashes in which four others died.

But lawyers for Powell argued her false statements about election fraud in the months preceding the Capitol insurrection were unmistakably not presented as true facts.

"It was clear to reasonable persons that Powell's claims were her opinions and legal theories on a matter of utmost public concern," her legal motion says. "Those members of the public who were interested in the controversy were free to, and did, review that evidence and reached their own conclusions – or awaited resolution of the matter by the courts before making up their minds."

The filing brought expressions of disbelief from Trump critics.

"This is her defense. Wow," tweeted the Republican representative Adam Kinzinger.

"Bad argument!" tweeted Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen. "[Powell] should have gone with an insanity defense due to #TrumpDerangementSyndrome."

"Shorter Sidney Powell: suckers!" tweeted Charlie Sykes, an editor of the anti-Trump conservative publication the Bulwark.

As Trump fought to reverse his election loss in November, the former president himself reportedly supported Powell's claims in private – and trumpeted them in public, touting Powell two weeks after the election as a key part of "the legal effort to defend OUR RIGHT to FREE and FAIR ELECTIONS".

Powell was publicly exiled from the Trump camp a week after that tweet, after she appeared at a news conference hosted by the Republican National Committee alongside Giuliani, whose hair dye memorably ran down his face, and Trump lawyer Jenna Ellis.

The group was "an elite strike force team that is working on behalf of the president and the campaign", Ellis announced.

Then Powell faced the cameras and claimed to have identified "massive influence of communist money through Venezuela, Cuba and likely China in the interference with our elections here in the United States".

Aides reportedly told Trump that Powell was not helping, and Giuliani and Ellis issued a subsequent statement announcing, "Sidney Powell is practicing law on her own. She is not a member of the Trump legal team. She is also not a lawyer for the president in his personal capacity."

But that did not prevent Powell from filing lawsuits the next week on Trump's behalf in Georgia, Michigan, Arizona and Wisconsin.

In her defense against the Dominion defamation lawsuit, Powell argued that whatever "reasonable persons" thought of her wild claims, Dominion had failed to demonstrate that she herself thought them to be false as she spoke them – a key distinction in defamation cases.

"In fact," Powell's motion reads, "she believed the allegations then and she believes them now."

Jacob