"Predator" teacher gets 22 years for sex with students

[garbon]

To clarify, he's the one that suddenly brought gayness into the picture when he was talking about rarity of homosexuals. Then that bizarre bit about needing reasonable doubt and then the Neilesque clincher of noting that gays are not normal people.

Gays are not normal people.

I've had sex with straight people, and I've had sex with gay people. Gay people are nothing like straight people. Straight people have boobs and a vagina.

Straight people = women?

[The Brain]

To clarify, he's the one that suddenly brought gayness into the picture when he was talking about rarity of homosexuals. Then that bizarre bit about needing reasonable doubt and then the Neilesque clincher of noting that gays are not normal people.

Gays are not normal people.

I've had sex with straight people, and I've had sex with gay people. Gay people are nothing like straight people. Straight people have boobs and a vagina.

Straight people = women?

Anecdotal evidence isn't admissible anymore on Languish?

[Monoriu]

To clarify, he's the one that suddenly brought gayness into the picture when he was talking about rarity of homosexuals. Then that bizarre bit about needing reasonable doubt and then the Neilesque clincher of noting that gays are not normal people.

Oh well, I have no idea if there is any difference between gayness or homosexuality.  I use these terms interchangably, and I think they mean the same thing.

I was annoyed and my words flew out to fast. I meant to say that you brought up gayness when talking about rarity of pedophilia.

They are both rare.  At least in my mind.  I also talked about intelligence and health and lot of other things.  As I said I have nothing against gays.

[Monoriu]

I wonder what Mono's "beyond reasonable doubt" proof of homosexuality would entail. 

He declares that he is gay?

What if they said it by accident or as a joke?

Those aren't "reasonable doubts".  If you say you are gay, I'll believe you.  If somebody says this person acts like a gay person because of the way he dresses or something, I'll dismiss it.  I will never consider anybody gay unless there is evidence that is beyond reasonable doubt.

[derspiess]

To clarify, he's the one that suddenly brought gayness into the picture when he was talking about rarity of homosexuals. Then that bizarre bit about needing reasonable doubt and then the Neilesque clincher of noting that gays are not normal people.

Gays are not normal people.

I've had sex with straight people, and I've had sex with gay people. Gay people are nothing like straight people. Straight people have boobs and a vagina.

Straight people = women?

Women = barrels of sin

[derspiess]

To clarify, he's the one that suddenly brought gayness into the picture when he was talking about rarity of homosexuals. Then that bizarre bit about needing reasonable doubt and then the Neilesque clincher of noting that gays are not normal people.

Oh well, I have no idea if there is any difference between gayness or homosexuality.  I use these terms interchangably, and I think they mean the same thing.

I was annoyed and my words flew out to fast. I meant to say that you brought up gayness when talking about rarity of pedophilia.

They are both rare.  At least in my mind.  I also talked about intelligence and health and lot of other things.  As I said I have nothing against gays.

You never mention gayness and pedophilia in the same sentence.  Or same paragraph.  Or the same day.

[garbon]

To clarify, he's the one that suddenly brought gayness into the picture when he was talking about rarity of homosexuals. Then that bizarre bit about needing reasonable doubt and then the Neilesque clincher of noting that gays are not normal people.

Oh well, I have no idea if there is any difference between gayness or homosexuality.  I use these terms interchangably, and I think they mean the same thing.

I was annoyed and my words flew out to fast. I meant to say that you brought up gayness when talking about rarity of pedophilia.

They are both rare.  At least in my mind.  I also talked about intelligence and health and lot of other things.  As I said I have nothing against gays.

You never mention gayness and pedophilia in the same sentence.  Or same paragraph.  Or the same day.

Thank you.

[garbon]

I wonder what Mono's "beyond reasonable doubt" proof of homosexuality would entail. 

He declares that he is gay?

What if they said it by accident or as a joke?

Those aren't "reasonable doubts".  If you say you are gay, I'll believe you.  If somebody says this person acts like a gay person because of the way he dresses or something, I'll dismiss it.  I will never consider anybody gay unless there is evidence that is beyond reasonable doubt.

So if I say that I'm The Queen of The Night, then you'll believe me?

[garbon]

To clarify, he's the one that suddenly brought gayness into the picture when he was talking about rarity of homosexuals. Then that bizarre bit about needing reasonable doubt and then the Neilesque clincher of noting that gays are not normal people.

Gays are not normal people.

I've had sex with straight people, and I've had sex with gay people. Gay people are nothing like straight people. Straight people have boobs and a vagina.

Straight people = women?

Women = barrels of sin

Gotcha, good to know.

[Monoriu]

I wonder what Mono's "beyond reasonable doubt" proof of homosexuality would entail. 

He declares that he is gay?

What if they said it by accident or as a joke?

Those aren't "reasonable doubts".  If you say you are gay, I'll believe you.  If somebody says this person acts like a gay person because of the way he dresses or something, I'll dismiss it.  I will never consider anybody gay unless there is evidence that is beyond reasonable doubt.

So if I say that I'm The Queen of The Night, then you'll believe me?

No.  I don't know what that means, but I presume that is some fantasy term.  But gays, no matter how rare they are, exist. 

[Syt]

So Romney has binders full of barrels of sin? Makes sense now.

[garbon]

I wonder what Mono's "beyond reasonable doubt" proof of homosexuality would entail. 

He declares that he is gay?

What if they said it by accident or as a joke?

Those aren't "reasonable doubts".  If you say you are gay, I'll believe you.  If somebody says this person acts like a gay person because of the way he dresses or something, I'll dismiss it.  I will never consider anybody gay unless there is evidence that is beyond reasonable doubt.

So if I say that I'm The Queen of The Night, then you'll believe me?

No.  I don't know what that means, but I presume that is some fantasy term.  But gays, no matter how rare they are, exist. 

Okay, what if I said that I was a queen of the night?

[Martinus]

To clarify, he's the one that suddenly brought gayness into the picture when he was talking about rarity of homosexuals. Then that bizarre bit about needing reasonable doubt and then the Neilesque clincher of noting that gays are not normal people.

Oh well, I have no idea if there is any difference between gayness or homosexuality.  I use these terms interchangably, and I think they mean the same thing.

I was annoyed and my words flew out to fast. I meant to say that you brought up gayness when talking about rarity of pedophilia.

That really screwed the rest of the debate.

[Valmy]

What were we debating?

[Martinus]

To clarify, he's the one that suddenly brought gayness into the picture when he was talking about rarity of homosexuals. Then that bizarre bit about needing reasonable doubt and then the Neilesque clincher of noting that gays are not normal people.

Gays are not normal people.

I've had sex with straight people, and I've had sex with gay people. Gay people are nothing like straight people. Straight people have boobs and a vagina.

Straight people = women?

Anecdotal evidence isn't admissible anymore on Languish?