News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Russo-Ukrainian War 2014-26

Started by mongers, August 06, 2014, 03:12:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jacob


Valmy

Quote from: Jacob on November 21, 2025, 12:49:16 PMPure evil

It is moments like this I really wish I had Trump Derangement Syndrome, that my loathing and fear of this regime was based on some delusional derangement. But no, they are not only every bit as horrible as I fear but worse. It is really incredible. There is no level of depravity low enough that this regime will not stoop to.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

Tamas

From Putin on Trump's 28 point surrender plan:

QuoteI believe that it, too, can form the basis of final peace settlement

He is not even making it a secret that he will not stop at it even if Ukraine agrees.

Razgovory

Question about Drones:  Is it more cost effective to use drones to put high explosives on a target than a big cannon?
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Zoupa

Orders of magnitude cheaper, in general. It's also much cheaper to train drone pilots.

Tamas

Quote from: Zoupa on November 21, 2025, 05:49:47 PMOrders of magnitude cheaper, in general. It's also much cheaper to train drone pilots.

Precision strike maybe but don't tell me an army of drones can do an artillery barrage cheaper than a batter of field guns.

Razgovory

I'm wondering about cost per pound of explosive.  Speed is probably a factor as well, it seems like a battery of guns of could drop explosives much faster than some drones.  An 155mm gun can fire about 2 rounds a minute for an extended period of time.  So that's about 30-40 pounds of boom per minute for one gun.  
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

HVC

Isn't a battery of artillery much more open to a counter bombardment?
Being lazy is bad; unless you still get what you want, then it's called "patience".
Hubris must be punished. Severely.

Razgovory

Quote from: HVC on November 21, 2025, 07:19:10 PMIsn't a battery of artillery much more open to a counter bombardment?

I suppose.  On the other hand you can't shoot down artillery shells.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

grumbler

Cost per pound of explosives, a gun is cheaper than a drone.  One 155 HE shell delivers a ~50 kg shell with ~7 kg of explosive. A Shahed-3 delivers a ~25kg warhead with about ~10kg filler. The shell costs ~$5,000 and the drone ~$20,000.

The drone has better range, of course, but a mch lower "rate of fire."

Tactical FPV drones deliver tiny warheads very accurately and cost in the low thousands of dollars. But $$/kg of HE is very high.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

Razgovory

I can't wait till we hand this over to AI.  Thousands of drones attacking at once with minimal human intervention.  Then someone like Sam Altman can wipe out most of the US government in a day.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Tamas

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/nov/22/ukraine-zelenskyy-peace-deal-us-nato-meeting

QuoteAsked why Kyiv should be forced to give up territory in the east that Russian troops have been unable to capture for 11 years, a US official said the deal "was beneficial to Ukraine". They said they envisaged Trump and Zelenskyy sitting down together and signing a document "for peace".

That's the crust of it I think. The extent to which Trump and thus his lapdogs consider this - it's a great photo opportunity for Trump to sign the "peace deal". Who the hell cares what's in it.

jimmy olsen

Quote from: Tamas on Today at 07:03:08 AMhttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/nov/22/ukraine-zelenskyy-peace-deal-us-nato-meeting

QuoteAsked why Kyiv should be forced to give up territory in the east that Russian troops have been unable to capture for 11 years, a US official said the deal "was beneficial to Ukraine". They said they envisaged Trump and Zelenskyy sitting down together and signing a document "for peace".

That's the crust of it I think. The extent to which Trump and thus his lapdogs consider this - it's a great photo opportunity for Trump to sign the "peace deal". Who the hell cares what's in it.
That's always been true. He's never beleived in anything.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

Josquius

Agreeing to a buffer zone with international troops in place first - fine.
Agreeing to a referendum in the contested areas if they want to be part of Russia - that would be fine (at least on the Ukrainian side I'd trust it to be fair)
Swapping donbass land for land elsewhere - I could see how that could be possible too.
But just withdrawing on the vague promise Russia honestly won't put troops there but the land is Russian... Fuck no.
██████
██████
██████

Josephus

Wasn't that long ago we were talking about finding an exit strategy that Putin can swallow. Now we're talking about how much land to give him. [sigh]
Civis Romanus Sum<br /><br />"My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world." Jack Layton 1950-2011