The US-Canada Merger Plebiscite

[Admiral Yi]

Bar Bar Bar, eh?

[Eddie Teach]

Sure. The natural resources/weird foreigners ratio is favorable.

We should also take Siberia.

[Neil]

Absolutely not.

[MadBurgerMaker]

Don't care either way.

[Josquius]

IMO, some American states are welcome to join Canada. Others aren't up to scratch however

[Savonarola]

I don't see how it could make any difference; half of Canada spends half the year here in Florida as it is.

[CountDeMoney]

Let Quebec declare independence, allow the more populous areas of provinces to petition as territories in order to apply for US statehood, make the vast majority of the rest of it all national parks.  It's not like they're using it anyway.

[Admiral Yi]

Quebec is the best part.  The rest is just Michigan, Minnesota, Washington state, and Alaska.

[Ideologue]

Permanent Democratic Party House, Senate, and Presidency.  I'm an American, and I voted yes.

Also, oil!

[11B4V]

Let Quebec declare independence, allow the more populous areas of provinces to petition as territories in order to apply for US statehood, make the vast majority of the rest of it all national parks.  It's not like they're using it anyway.

Awesome idea. Expand US big game hunting.

[Eddie Teach]

Permanent Democratic Party House, Senate, and Presidency.

You clearly haven't been paying attention to the last 200 years of American political history.

[katmai]

As long as we get rid of the Canadians first, sure!

[Phillip V]

Yes.

[Ideologue]

Permanent Democratic Party House, Senate, and Presidency.

You clearly haven't been paying attention to the last 200 years of American political history.

I don't think the Americanadian merger would affect elections in the past, if that's what you're driving at.

[dps]

Permanent Democratic Party House, Senate, and Presidency.

You clearly haven't been paying attention to the last 200 years of American political history.

I don't think the Americanadian merger would affect elections in the past, if that's what you're driving at.

I think his point is that apparantly permanent majorities never last all that long at the national level, especially at the Presidential level.  But even in Congress, the longest that one party controlled both Houses was 28 years I think (might be wrong about the exact length of time, but it's gotta be somewhere in that range).