A giant Teutonic brothel - Has liberalization gone too far?

Started by Zanza, November 14, 2013, 02:02:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

grumbler

Quote from: crazy canuck on November 20, 2013, 04:06:10 PM
I dont think BB meant to go that far.  It is true that our Charter has a number of enumerated rights but we also come from a long legal history of having unwritten rights.  As a result the rights enumerated in the Charter are not an exhaustive list of all rights protected by law (only those protected under the Charter) and the rights that are enumerated in the Charter are given a wide and liberal interpretation.

Property Rights are a good example.  Although we do not have an express enumerated property right in our Charter, property rights still exist and are given considerable weight whenever the Court interprets legislation which attempts to diminish those rights (although not within the context of a Charter analysis).  However, we do not go as far as American jurisdprudence for the reasons you have stated.

As I said to BB, for the purposes of the argument Berkut was making these distinctions dont really matter that much.
Okay.  Thanks for clearing that up for me.  I agree with you about it not being relevant to Berkut's argument.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

jimmy olsen

Looks like France is rejecting the German experience and opting to go with the Swedish method.

http://www.salon.com/2013/11/26/prostitution_france_wants_to_punish_clients/

QuotePARIS (AP) — France's government is pushing one of Europe's toughest laws against prostitution and sex trafficking, and other countries are watching closely. Advocates hope that a draft French law going to parliament Wednesday will help change long-held attitudes toward the world's oldest profession — by punishing the customer and protecting the prostitute.

The bill, however, is facing resistance in a country with a libertine reputation and a Mediterranean macho streak, and has prompted petitions defending those who buy sex. Signatories include screen icon Catherine Deneuve —who played a prostitute in the cult film "Belle de Jour" — and crooner Charles Aznavour.

Prostitution is currently legal in France, but brothels, pimping and soliciting in public are illegal.

The bill has prompted debate about sex and sexism in France, where former International Monetary Fund chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn is facing charges of aggravated pimping. He denies wrongdoing, though his lawyer has defended Strauss-Kahn's free-wheeling sex life.

It has also called attention to the evolution of the sex business, as the number of foreign prostitutes, especially from Asia and eastern Europe, has soared in recent years.

The proposed law would introduce a 1,500-euro ($2,000) fine —rising to 3,000-euro at the second offense— for the clients of prostitutes. They could also be forced to attend classes aimed at highlighting the harms of prostitution.

The bill aims to decriminalize the estimated 40,000 prostitutes in France, by scrapping a 2003 law that bans soliciting on the streets, and making it easier for foreign prostitutes to remain legally in France if they enter a process to get out of prostitution. One of the bill's authors, Maud Olivier, says it's about "getting rid the consequence of unequal and archaic relationships between men and women."

Other countries such as Germany, Switzerland and the Netherlands, where brothels are legal, are especially interested in the French experience.

"If France moves, that could be the turning point for other European countries," said Gregoire Thery, secretary-general of the Mouvement du Nid, an organization which says it helps 5,000 prostitutes in France each year.

The proposed law —written by a group of lawmakers from both right and left and backed by the Socialist government— follows the example of Sweden, which passed similar legislation in 1999.
advertisement

A report commissioned by the Swedish government showed that the number of people involved in street prostitution in Sweden's three largest cities dropped from around 730 in 1999 to 300-430 a year in the 10 years after that. At the same time, street prostitution in neighboring Norway and Denmark increased.

The Netherlands went the other way, legalizing prostitution in 2000. But the policy has come in for criticism for playing into the hands of criminals and human traffickers who exploit women. The government is now aiming to crack down on human trafficking by tightening laws.

Supporters of the French draft law argue that it could reduce sex trafficking and empower prostitutes.

"The current law is not on our side so we keep being trapped in that system, and the client knows that, he plays with that. When we hear about 'prostitution by choice,' I think that it is still prostitution as violence toward women, and we cannot keep tolerating that violence anymore," said Rosen Hicher, 57, who was a prostitute from 1988 to 2009.

"One day, a client told me: 'If you don't accept to do it without condom, I will call the police,'" she told a news conference. "I was able to say to him: 'clear off'. But another one wouldn't because she would be under control of a pimp or would be sold by her husband, her father or her brother."

Opponents of the French bill argue the opposite, and fear that cracking down will push prostitutes into a dangerous position: Being forced to hide, they would be even more at the mercy of pimps and violent clients, and cut off from the organizations able to help them.

"More clandestine practices means we would find ourselves in more secluded places, and therefore subject to possible violence," Thierry Schaffauser, a 31-year old escort and spokesman for sex workers' group Strass, told The Associated Press.

And in dealings with the client, he said, prostitutes would "have less power because when you make less profit, you might have to accept clients that you wouldn't normally accept, accept doing something you might not have accepted before."

A contentious open letter titled "Hands off my whore" was released last month by a group of men, including a lawyer for Strauss-Khan, in favor of a man's right to buy physical pleasure.

And earlier this month, a petition emerged, signed by 60 celebrities, including Deneuve and Aznavour, saying: "Without supporting or promoting prostitution, we reject the penalization of those who prostitute themselves and those who buy their services, and we ask for a real debate without ideological prejudice."

Among them was a former minister of culture and education, Jack Lang, who told the AP that he is "very cautious about penalizing clients — for reasons of principle, of personal belief, kind of subjective reasons. That must not be a hasty decision."

___

Malin Rising in Stockholm and Mike Corder in Amsterdam and Masha Macpherson in Paris contributed to this report.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

garbon

I feel like I'm missing something with that article. It said public solicitation, pimping and brothels are illegal but then has quotes regarding how people wouldn't be stuck under pimps if laws change.
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

crazy canuck

Quote from: garbon on November 27, 2013, 07:32:03 AM
I feel like I'm missing something with that article. It said public solicitation, pimping and brothels are illegal but then has quotes regarding how people wouldn't be stuck under pimps if laws change.

The Bill aims to make public solicitation legal under certain circumstances.  The prostitute could then in theory deal with their customers directly which would allow her operate without a pimp.

Just because pimping is illegal doesnt mean that they dont exist. ;)

dps

Quote from: crazy canuck on November 28, 2013, 01:06:40 PM
Quote from: garbon on November 27, 2013, 07:32:03 AM
I feel like I'm missing something with that article. It said public solicitation, pimping and brothels are illegal but then has quotes regarding how people wouldn't be stuck under pimps if laws change.

The Bill aims to make public solicitation legal under certain circumstances.  The prostitute could then in theory deal with their customers directly which would allow her operate without a pimp.

Just because pimping is illegal doesnt mean that they dont exist. ;)

Yeah, but I think Garbon's point was that if prostitution itself is made legal it doesn't seem to automatically follow that the pimps would cease to exist.

crazy canuck

Quote from: dps on November 29, 2013, 04:04:49 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 28, 2013, 01:06:40 PM
Quote from: garbon on November 27, 2013, 07:32:03 AM
I feel like I'm missing something with that article. It said public solicitation, pimping and brothels are illegal but then has quotes regarding how people wouldn't be stuck under pimps if laws change.

The Bill aims to make public solicitation legal under certain circumstances.  The prostitute could then in theory deal with their customers directly which would allow her operate without a pimp.

Just because pimping is illegal doesnt mean that they dont exist. ;)

Yeah, but I think Garbon's point was that if prostitution itself is made legal it doesn't seem to automatically follow that the pimps would cease to exist.

Then he would not have read the article very well.  Prostitution itself is already legal.  The problem is that public solicitation is not.  If public solicitation is permitted then that would significantly cut out the role of the pimp.

Barrister

Quote from: crazy canuck on November 29, 2013, 04:09:52 PM
Quote from: dps on November 29, 2013, 04:04:49 PM
Quote from: crazy canuck on November 28, 2013, 01:06:40 PM
Quote from: garbon on November 27, 2013, 07:32:03 AM
I feel like I'm missing something with that article. It said public solicitation, pimping and brothels are illegal but then has quotes regarding how people wouldn't be stuck under pimps if laws change.

The Bill aims to make public solicitation legal under certain circumstances.  The prostitute could then in theory deal with their customers directly which would allow her operate without a pimp.

Just because pimping is illegal doesnt mean that they dont exist. ;)

Yeah, but I think Garbon's point was that if prostitution itself is made legal it doesn't seem to automatically follow that the pimps would cease to exist.

Then he would not have read the article very well.  Prostitution itself is already legal.  The problem is that public solicitation is not.  If public solicitation is permitted then that would significantly cut out the role of the pimp.

Except if you go back to the original article, it seems the German experience is that liberalization doesn't have that effect.
Posts here are my own private opinions.  I do not speak for my employer.

crazy canuck

Quote from: Barrister on November 29, 2013, 04:11:25 PM
Except if you go back to the original article, it seems the German experience is that liberalization doesn't have that effect.

The Germans have a different model.  They decriminalized the whole lot - including pimping.  So I am not sure any valid analogy can be made.

dps

Quote from: crazy canuck on November 29, 2013, 04:14:12 PM
Quote from: Barrister on November 29, 2013, 04:11:25 PM
Except if you go back to the original article, it seems the German experience is that liberalization doesn't have that effect.

The Germans have a different model.  They decriminalized the whole lot - including pimping.  So I am not sure any valid analogy can be made.

Yes, but if both solicitation and pimping are legal, and pimping doesn't fulfill some function, then one would expect it to fade out.  That it hasn't suggests that it does serve some function, and would probably still do so even if it continues to be illegal even when solicitation itself is legal. 

crazy canuck

Quote from: dps on November 29, 2013, 04:29:30 PM
Yes, but if both solicitation and pimping are legal, and pimping doesn't fulfill some function, then one would expect it to fade out.  That it hasn't suggests that it does serve some function, and would probably still do so even if it continues to be illegal even when solicitation itself is legal.

If public solicitation is made legal but pimping remains illegal then the prostitute can obtain the assistance of the state to rid herself of a pimp.  If the state condones pimping then nothing much will change since pimps will, now legally, be able to exert the same kinds of controls they always have had on the most vulnerable.


Admiral Yi

Depends if we're talking about Harvey Kietel style manipulation of the vulnerable, Heidi Fleiss style brokering, or Taken style productivity encouragement.


CountDeMoney

Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 29, 2013, 05:52:10 PM
Depends if we're talking about Harvey Kietel style manipulation of the vulnerable,

OMG HAWT


CountDeMoney

Hope there's at least some Handi-Wipes for those bar stools.