Shooter at Washington Navy Yard kills 12

[mongers]

It's what you often do on the forum, 'rephrasing' other's posts.

Care to provide an example?  I maintain that I quote others, and don't tell them what they think or why they think it.  Prove me wrong.

I look at it this way, the more I engage you in debate, the less time you have to follow around or pick on some of our younger or more vulnerable posters. I regard this as a community service for the forum. 

It always bring a smile to my face when I sign in to Languish and look at the threads I've posted in, to find a grumbler post taking a pop at me, all the better if it included a straight out ad hominem. 


I think many here are aware of your various semantic nickpicks, mischaractisations of another member's posts and other tactics employed in your attempts to declare yourself the 'winner'.

How much re-phrasing plays in your 'game', I can't be arsed to find out, because I don't respect you and indeed find you one of the most contemptible posters I've ever encountered on the internet. 

Which I find rather sad, as I think you'd probably turn out to be a top-bloke in real life if we ever met, no doubt you've got a wealth of life experience that many posters would be proud to have and I among them  would probably enjoy greatly hearing about them. 

I won't presume to offer you any advice, as how you wish to come over is your choice. If you're happy with the way you appear on the internet, then do carry on, though I do think there are other, better alternatives to the role you play on this forum. 

Best wishes Mongers.

[The Minsky Moment]

It's what you often do on the forum, 'rephrasing' other's posts.

Care to provide an example?  I maintain that I quote others, and don't tell them what they think or why they think it.  Prove me wrong.

So you admit it.

[grumbler]

It's what you often do on the forum, 'rephrasing' other's posts.

Care to provide an example?  I maintain that I quote others, and don't tell them what they think or why they think it.  Prove me wrong.

I look at it this way, the more I engage you in debate, the less time you have to follow around or pick on some of our younger or more vulnerable posters. I regard this as a community service for the forum. 

It always bring a smile to my face when I sign in to Languish and look at the threads I've posted in, to find a grumbler post taking a pop at me, all the better if it included a straight out ad hominem. 


I think many here are aware of your various semantic nickpicks, mischaractisations of another member's posts and other tactics employed in your attempts to declare yourself the 'winner'.

How much re-phrasing plays in your 'game', I can't be arsed to find out, because I don't respect you and indeed find you one of the most contemptible posters I've ever encountered on the internet. 

Which I find rather sad, as I think you'd probably turn out to be a top-bloke in real life if we ever met, no doubt you've got a wealth of life experience that many posters would be proud to have and I among them  would probably enjoy greatly hearing about them. 

I won't presume to offer you any advice, as how you wish to come over is your choice. If you're happy with the way you appear on the internet, then do carry on, though I do think there are other, better alternatives to the role you play on this forum. 

Best wishes Mongers.

I didn't think you could back your accusations with examples.  Thanks for proving my point.

As a weasel, this goes down as tl;dr

[grumbler]

It's what you often do on the forum, 'rephrasing' other's posts.

Care to provide an example?  I maintain that I quote others, and don't tell them what they think or why they think it.  Prove me wrong.

So you admit it.

Yes... I admit it... I...I... quote others on the internet! 

[mongers]

It's what you often do on the forum, 'rephrasing' other's posts.

Care to provide an example?  I maintain that I quote others, and don't tell them what they think or why they think it.  Prove me wrong.

I look at it this way, the more I engage you in debate, the less time you have to follow around or pick on some of our younger or more vulnerable posters. I regard this as a community service for the forum. 

It always bring a smile to my face when I sign in to Languish and look at the threads I've posted in, to find a grumbler post taking a pop at me, all the better if it included a straight out ad hominem. 


I think many here are aware of your various semantic nickpicks, mischaractisations of another member's posts and other tactics employed in your attempts to declare yourself the 'winner'.

How much re-phrasing plays in your 'game', I can't be arsed to find out, because I don't respect you and indeed find you one of the most contemptible posters I've ever encountered on the internet. 

Which I find rather sad, as I think you'd probably turn out to be a top-bloke in real life if we ever met, no doubt you've got a wealth of life experience that many posters would be proud to have and I among them  would probably enjoy greatly hearing about them. 

I won't presume to offer you any advice, as how you wish to come over is your choice. If you're happy with the way you appear on the internet, then do carry on, though I do think there are other, better alternatives to the role you play on this forum. 

Best wishes Mongers.

I didn't think you could back your accusations with examples.  Thanks for proving my point.

As a weasel, this goes down as tl;dr

Goodnight, I'm glad I've helped you to feel 'better' about yourself. 

[Razgovory]

I would like to say that Grumbler is deliberately dishonest when arguing and frequently fabricates other people's positions.  If I am wrong in this, let him speak up, if I am correct let him be silent.

[Ideologue]

"Violence-numb nation" from Money's article.  Good fucking grief.  The lack of historical perspective is amazing; you'd think we were being bombed into oblivion or something.

[Siege]

I like Mongers.

[Ed Anger]

I would like to say that Grumbler is deliberately dishonest when arguing and frequently fabricates other people's positions.  If I am wrong in this, let him speak up, if I am correct let him be silent.

I saw what you did there

[mongers]

I like Mongers.

Good grief,  Seigy thanks for that.

You know you're actually much 'loved' here. 

The only downside to your comment is, yet again, it's not from a women.   

[grumbler]

Goodnight, I'm glad I've helped you to feel 'better' about yourself. 

The passive-aggressive is strong in you today. 

[grumbler]

I saw what you did there

Yeah, that wasn't at all obvious, was it? 

[crazy canuck]

If I am wrong  in this, let him speak up, if I am correct let him be silent.

Well done

[Neil]

It's what you often do on the forum, 'rephrasing' other's posts.

Care to provide an example?  I maintain that I quote others, and don't tell them what they think or why they think it.  Prove me wrong.

I look at it this way, the more I engage you in debate, the less time you have to follow around or pick on some of our younger or more vulnerable posters. I regard this as a community service for the forum. 

It always bring a smile to my face when I sign in to Languish and look at the threads I've posted in, to find a grumbler post taking a pop at me, all the better if it included a straight out ad hominem. 


I think many here are aware of your various semantic nickpicks, mischaractisations of another member's posts and other tactics employed in your attempts to declare yourself the 'winner'.

How much re-phrasing plays in your 'game', I can't be arsed to find out, because I don't respect you and indeed find you one of the most contemptible posters I've ever encountered on the internet. 

Which I find rather sad, as I think you'd probably turn out to be a top-bloke in real life if we ever met, no doubt you've got a wealth of life experience that many posters would be proud to have and I among them  would probably enjoy greatly hearing about them. 

I won't presume to offer you any advice, as how you wish to come over is your choice. If you're happy with the way you appear on the internet, then do carry on, though I do think there are other, better alternatives to the role you play on this forum. 

Best wishes Mongers.

I didn't think you could back your accusations with examples.  Thanks for proving my point.

As a weasel, this goes down as tl;dr

Isn't it unreasonable to expect him to go through your posts?  Besides, there's years of dickery that's locked in the old forum archives, and is thus inaccessable.

[Eddie Teach]

Your first point is true, but it's also unreasonable to judge grumbler by posts from six years ago if his recent posts aren't in the same vein.