News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Recent posts

#71
Off the Record / Re: Russo-Ukrainian War 2014-2...
Last post by Zoupa - December 08, 2025, 07:51:52 PM
They've attacked that pipeline several times I think. But also it goes through Ukraine doesn't it?
#72
Off the Record / Re: What does a TRUMP presiden...
Last post by mongers - December 08, 2025, 07:41:50 PM
Who'll direct trump's inevitable 'Triumph of the Will' propaganda piece?


Or will it all be AI BS sliced together off of youtube?
#73
Off the Record / Re: Russo-Ukrainian War 2014-2...
Last post by Tonitrus - December 08, 2025, 07:26:11 PM
Couldn't Ukraine cut off Hungary from their Russian oil supply? :hmm:
#74
Off the Record / Re: Facebook Follies of Friend...
Last post by viper37 - December 08, 2025, 07:03:36 PM
Admit it, the geek kid in you is waking up
https://www.facebook.com/reel/752638887096942
#75
Off the Record / Re: TV/Movies Megathread
Last post by viper37 - December 08, 2025, 06:30:50 PM

Quoteaging movie legend played against type by George Clooney.
George Timothy Clooney. (1961-05-06) May 6, 1961 (age 64) 


hmm.

Ok, fair enough, we're all getting close to that  :P
#76
Off the Record / Re: Brexit and the waning days...
Last post by Richard Hakluyt - December 08, 2025, 05:34:48 PM
Disabled people can get the personal independence payment (PIP) which has a mobility component, if they qualify for the higher rate then they are eligible to take part in the motability scheme Essentially you exchange your higher rate PIP payment for the motability vehicle. There is no extra cost to the taxpayer as the PIP covers the cost of the car lease. If they want to then the disabled person can pay extra to get a more hi-spec model, again there is no additional cost to the taxpayer.

I think there are two lines of potential criticism of the motability scheme. Firstly, how many people are allowed to get higher rate PIP mobility component when they really shouldn't be. Secondly, is the higher rate PIP mobility component too high?

The thing about the fancy cars though? Pure, unadulterated bullshit; and, instead of making that point, the government has caved...as usual.
#77
Off the Record / Re: Russo-Ukrainian War 2014-2...
Last post by Jacob - December 08, 2025, 05:21:57 PM
My working assumption is that it's all pay-to-play.
#78
Gaming HQ / Re: Europa Universalis V confi...
Last post by crazy canuck - December 08, 2025, 05:15:00 PM
Yeah, I would have much preferred they stayed with the game on release and addressed patches and DLCs in due course. That is what the community has come to expect.  This whipsawing of changes and then changes to changes has been problematic. 

They had a good stable (DG aside) game on release.  Call that a win and move on to the first planned DLC and address all the balance issues then.

At least for me the game is no longer stable and the game constantly crashes now.
#79
Off the Record / Re: Football (Soccer) Thread
Last post by Duque de Bragança - December 08, 2025, 05:11:00 PM
Quote from: Norgy on December 08, 2025, 02:54:22 PM
Quote from: Baron von Schtinkenbutt on December 08, 2025, 09:41:20 AMAlternately, FIFA could expand the field to 64, drop the group stage entirely, and structure the tournament as one large single-elimination bracket, similar to the way the NCAA basketball tournaments are structured.  The biggest problem is that they would need some means of ranking all the teams in the field in order to properly construct the bracket.

It's too radical a change to actually happen, but it would be interesting.

The group stage is really a post-war thing. The worst was probably Spain '82 with two group stages. FIFA already has the FIFA ranking system for seeding, so it would not be that much of an issue except what frunk mentions. Nobody wants to go home after a single game.



It's supposed to be a cup (World Cup) so single elimination matches are part of the game, after an inital phase to avoid going home after only one game as you.

Not a round robin.
#80
Off the Record / Re: Russo-Ukrainian War 2014-2...
Last post by Duque de Bragança - December 08, 2025, 05:08:49 PM
Quote from: viper37 on December 08, 2025, 04:31:49 PM
Quote from: Tamas on December 08, 2025, 04:19:54 PMto sell on Russian oil they buy freely to countries affected by the sanctions, most notably Serbia.
I thought Trump was going after countries doing that?  :lol:

I guess Trump could get his cut too.  :P