
Quote from: Baron von Schtinkenbutt on December 01, 2025, 05:55:12 PMQuote from: Zoupa on December 01, 2025, 05:19:29 PMPURL is usually US hardware yes. Selling something is not giving something.
cel's point is that the Trump administration could block that part if they wanted to get pissy about it. Thus, it's a card they hold.
Quote from: Zoupa on December 01, 2025, 05:19:29 PMPURL is usually US hardware yes. Selling something is not giving something.
Quote from: DGuller on December 01, 2025, 09:27:04 AMI'm sure your child would prefer you not to waste your own time on repetitive child interaction tasks, they'd prefer you to leave that to AI and instead work more hours so that you could buy them more toys.
Quote from: celedhring on December 01, 2025, 05:32:30 AMQuote from: Zoupa on November 30, 2025, 07:53:55 PM
Trump doesn't have the cards.
Isn't PURL yank hardware, though? Just that it's bought by Ukraine and paid by Euro cash.
I mean, Trump can chose not to sell us the hardware, which would be stupid, but here we are.
Quote from: Josquius on December 01, 2025, 12:14:42 PMQuote from: Legbiter on December 01, 2025, 11:17:21 AMThe new crop of russian assault infantry.
https://x.com/wartranslated/status/1992235930300936365
They've been captured here?
Lucky guys if so. If they're about to go in...poor sods.
QuoteDespite widespread adoption, the impact of AI tools on software development in the wild remains understudied. We conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to understand how AI tools at the February-June 2025 frontier affect the productivity of experienced open-source developers. 16 developers with moderate AI experience complete 246 tasks in mature projects on which they have an average of 5 years of prior experience. Each task is randomly assigned to allow or disallow usage of early 2025 AI tools. When AI tools are allowed, developers primarily use Cursor Pro, a popular code editor, and Claude 3.5/3.7 Sonnet. Before starting tasks, developers forecast that allowing AI will reduce completion time by 24%. After completing the study, developers estimate that allowing AI reduced completion time by 20%. Surprisingly, we find that allowing AI actually increases completion time by 19%--AI tooling slowed developers down. This slowdown also contradicts predictions from experts in economics (39% shorter) and ML (38% shorter). To understand this result, we collect and evaluate evidence for 20 properties of our setting that a priori could contribute to the observed slowdown effect--for example, the size and quality standards of projects, or prior developer experience with AI tooling. Although the influence of experimental artifacts cannot be entirely ruled out, the robustness of the slowdown effect across our analyses suggests it is unlikely to primarily be a function of our experimental design.
Quote from: DGuller on December 01, 2025, 12:18:02 PMI wonder what the point of publishing such stories is. Bullshit works best when it's not easily falsifiable, the Finns surrendering part would be easily falsifiable pretty quickly.I don't think it would have been easily or quickly falsifiable in 1939 for all sorts of reasons.
Page created in 0.029 seconds with 11 queries.