Quote from: Sheilbh on December 03, 2024, 03:13:10 PMSo basically a YOLO coup?
Quote from: Norgy on December 03, 2024, 02:49:34 PMI am all for Canada and the United States of America joining into a large bigly superstate. It'd mean the US get actual social democrats as citizens.
QuoteHowever, I have also played Call of Duty Black Ops 6 and Nijm is definitely making a fair point. His description of how the game treats Iraqi soldiers doesn't even convey how fully dehumanized they are in that game, which seems especially in bad taste now that it is widely agreed upon that what the U.S. military did to Iraq was one of the worst mistakes in the history of foreign policy. This is not to mention countless other Call of Duty and other first-person shooter games in which Arabs, Russians, and other nationalities are treated as nothing more than canon fodder. If you, like me, played video games your entire life you probably have killed hundreds of thousands of Arab video game NPCs. Fursan al-Aqsa's violation and the reason the UK appears to have deemed it "extremist" is that in this case the player character is a Palestinian and the enemies are Israeli soldiers.
Another notable difference is that while Call of Duty has increasingly flirted with referencing real and current conflicts (the first Modern Warfare, which has levels that resemble the U.S. invasion of Iraq but takes place in a fictional country, came out only four years after the invasion), the Operation al-Aqsa Flood Update is referencing a shocking attack that is just over a year old, and is now still an active war.
Again, my professional opinion as someone who reviewed video games for many years is that Fursan al-Aqsa sucks, and also in bad taste if you choose to judge it in that way. As Nijm points out, the same is true for Call of Duty. Valve so far has not made the distinction between the two, but the UK government has.
Page created in 0.089 seconds with 16 queries.