Recent posts

#31

Off the Record / Re: Trump's Venezuela Vendetta

Last post by Sheilbh - Today at 03:59:23 PM

Which point, and what is the disagreement?

Oh nothing massive You said I had a theory about local collaborators which was being slow-rolled - but it was competent.

I would throw in a million caveats around that - at best a possibility. I'd read about US intelligence contacts with the VP and her brother - so wondered if there's something there, especially given that Trump (sensibly) is ignoring the opposition. Plus it might not be visible on day two after kidnapping Madur - if there's something going on, I think the pace will be set by the Venezuelans according to their political needs.

And if there's something it could still be incompetent - one possibility in that scenario is that a faction within Venezuela made a power-play and got the Americans to provide the muscle.

#32

Off the Record / Re: The Shooting Gallery: Poli...

Last post by Tonitrus - Today at 03:56:56 PM

No one bar the king is immune to criminal charges.

And I think there is a political (even moral) imperative to continuously test that premise.

#33

Off the Record / Re: Trump's Venezuela Vendetta

Last post by Jacob - Today at 03:49:03 PM

I didn't totally agee Jake's characterisation of my point here.

Which point, and what is the disagreement?

#34

Off the Record / Re: The Shooting Gallery: Poli...

Last post by Sheilbh - Today at 03:37:27 PM

Chance of ICE squads being deployed at polling stations in Democratic leaning areas during the midterms = 90%

Yes. I mean they're already deployed in "chaotic" cities etc.

#35

Off the Record / Re: The Shooting Gallery: Poli...

Last post by crazy canuck - Today at 03:35:46 PM

Why do you have a 10% margin of doubt?

10% chance there's no election?

That makes sense

#36

Off the Record / Re: [Canada] Canadian Politics...

Last post by crazy canuck - Today at 03:33:47 PM

I am not sure if this is still accurate - but it used to be said there are three levels of understanding.

The first level is if you understand enough to make a note of what has been said*

I trained a guy, great guy mind you, but his note taking was the bane of my existence. I was training him as a replacement. And his notes were so damn detailed, in my view to a detrimental level. I gave a months notice so it's not like he was in a rush to note everything. Anyway, I digress, my main point of contention was that instead of understanding why or what he was doing he was so focused on writing that he wasn't catching on. I tried several times to gently guide him into focusing on why we were doing things but it was in vain. If he ever misplaced that notebook he'd be screwed

It could be just because I learn differently so I find it baffling, but I don't get people that learn by rote. One little change and they get flustered and screw everything up. And I know a lot of people that learn that way.

Yeah, exactly - same concept.  Not understanding what is being said, just recording what is being said to read later, and hopefully understand.

[Sure, I'm talking about a modest recovery: hundreds of thousands of barrels a day extra rather than the millions needed to lift Venezuela's production back to the peaks of the early 1970s and late 1990s. Yet this can be brought on stream rapidly by oil industry standards — say 12 to 18 months — and without eyewatering spending. American oil companies will be involved in that effort.]

#37

Off the Record / Re: Trump's Venezuela Vendetta

Last post by Sheilbh - Today at 03:25:01 PM

I didn't totally agee Jake's characterisation of my point here. But couple of interesting moves today via Javier Blas. Jorge Rodriguez, who heads the Parliament and is the brother of the Acting President announcing the release of a "significant number" of political prisoners - interesting particularly because from what I'd read Jorge Rodriguz was who US intelligence had been speaking too.

Separately the Venezuelan state-owned oil company, PDVSA, says it's in talks with the US for the sale of oil to "benefit both sides". No mention of US oil sanctions or Maduro.

As I say there are two countries here with politics at place. This stuff maybe has me wondering who made first contact in those Venezuelan elite-CIA conversations

Blas is Bloomberg Energy and Commodities columnist - who I always read on this stuff - is also a bit more positive on oil. Feels a bit too bull-ish but interesting and useful corrective:

Forget the Naysayers, Venezuela Offers Quick Oil Wins
January 9, 2026 at 4:30 AM GMT
By Javier Blas
Javier Blas is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy and commodities. He is coauthor of "The World for Sale: Money, Power and the Traders Who Barter the Earth's Resources."

Conventional wisdom says the future of the Venezuelan oil industry is bleak. I disagree. The naysayers state that any output gains are far, far away and need huge investments. The reality is more nuanced. There are low-hanging barrels in the country, if you'll forgive the mixed metaphor. This is good-quality crude that's relatively easy to extract — and it opens the way to quick wins in reviving dilapidated petroleum infrastructure.

Sure, I'm talking about a modest recovery: hundreds of thousands of barrels a day extra rather than the millions needed to lift Venezuela's production back to the peaks of the early 1970s and late 1990s. Yet this can be brought on stream rapidly by oil industry standards — say 12 to 18 months — and without eyewatering spending. American oil companies will be involved in that effort.

Will it be as much as the 700,000 barrels a day extra mooted by US Energy Secretary Chris Wright? That may be a stretch. I'd be more comfortable with predicting a 300,000 to 500,000 range by mid-2027 if all goes smoothly. That's still a large amount of oil. In an already oversupplied market any extra barrels will hurt prices — and the OPEC cartel.

Where the prevailing commentary is right is that Venezuela has a lot — a lot — of hard-to-get and very low-quality crude. Naysayers are right that developing those reserves would take probably as long as a decade and perhaps as much as $100 billion in investment. The prize is enormous, but so are the challenges.



Understanding the difference between the easier- and harder-to-extract oil is crucial when assessing Venezuela's potential. Regrettably, much of the debate has focused on the difficult stuff. The split is also critical to understanding the role US companies might play. Be sure of one thing: They're interested in Venezuela, regardless of any public wariness. If they weren't, why would Chevron Corp., America's biggest oil company after Exxon Mobil Corp., have fought tooth and nail to remain in the country over the last 25 years? In the coming months, I expect Chevron to push for an even larger role there.

Conspiracy theorists see Big Oil's fingerprints all over President Donald Trump's Venezuela gambit, just as they did when George W Bush's troops invaded Iraq. I don't think the companies knew exactly what Trump was planning. But by late November and early December, anyone who matters in the US industry believed ousting Nicolas Maduro was merely a question of how and when. Many I spoke to thought it was weeks away.

To understand what's going to happen now, one needs to look at the geography and geology. Venezuela sits atop a complex oil map developed over a century of exploration and exploitation. To simplify, let me separate its assets into two buckets: the conventional oilfields around Lake Maracaibo in western Venezuela and the Monagas basin in the east; and the so-called Orinoco belt in its southeast, which I would define as unconventional oil1.

The "quick wins" to lift production are in Maracaibo and Monagas, says Ivan Sandrea, a Venezuelan geologist and former chief executive officer of Sierra Oil and Gas. "Years of neglect means oil production plunged, but with some limited spending and the right conditions, production can recover."



The region around Maracaibo is home to the Bolivar Coastal Fields, a cluster that includes legendary sites such as Tia Juana and Bachaquero-Lagunillas. Some have produced oil since the 1920s, but still have more to give. The infrastructure is truly run down, but basic repairs would go a long way to boosting output. It needs a few billion dollars in operational spending, not gargantuan capital expenditure. The US has said it will roll back sanctions to "authorize the import of select oilfield equipment, parts, and services."

The Monagas basin also contains several important oilfields; above all the El Furrial, discovered four decades ago and once a cash cow for the country. As with Maracaibo, the eastern fields are in desperate need of fixing up.

Carlos Bellorin, a Venezuelan oil analyst at Welligence Energy Analytics, reckons output from the top-25 Maracaibo and Monagas oilfields has dropped by more than 1 million barrels in a decade. Today, they're "estimated to produce around 450,000 barrels a day, underscoring the magnitude of the upside," he says. Other local experts broadly agree, even if everyone has their own estimates.

Will US companies play a big role? It depends who you mean. For big oil-services companies — Halliburton Co., Baker Hughes Co., SLB Ltd. and Weatherford International — the answer is yes. Days after Maduro's capture, the boss of Weatherford, a specialist in constructing wells, described Venezuela as a "massive opportunity" and the "most interesting" development in the industry for a long while.

Chevron will be there as it already has an interest in two fields in the Maracaibo basin. Its US oil major peers? Unlikely at first. But Venezuela isn't just an American playground. Expect to see European companies already present — Italy's Eni SpA, Spain's Repsol SA and France's Maurel et Prom SA — trying to take advantage.

After the quick-win barrels are pumped, boosting output further will be tougher. A key constraint is the availability of electricity needed to run pumps and other kit. Power shortages are particularly acute in the Maracaibo basin. To fix this, serious investment would be needed and that would take time.



Crucially, the oil from the Maracaibo and Monagas areas is of mixed quality, some of it heavy, but much of it the more easily refined medium and light stuff. US refiners have consumed it for decades and would buy it again given the chance.

The Orinoco belt is completely different to the conventional basins. The oil there is so viscous it looks like marmalade, and it needs to be diluted with petrochemicals such as naphtha to flow. Back in the 1990s the region was a magnet for the global oil industry, attracting the likes of Exxon, ConocoPhillips and TotalEnergies SE. Apart from Chevron, most foreign players left or were forced out.

Even if US oil companies are willing to reinvest here, the hurdles are very high. Billions of dollars in investment would be needed, perhaps as much as $10 billion per year. Still, Chevron has a 30% stake in two Orinoco projects and it is likely to double down if conditions allow.

The commodity market is usually guilty of two sins when analyzing oil-rich nations emerging from crisis: People underestimate their ability to quickly recover some lost production; and massively overestimate the long-term gains.

I've seen this movie several times in nearly 30 years covering the industry, including Iraq in 2003, Libya in 2011 and Iran in 2021-2023. Venezuela itself is an example: After oil production plunged to a 100-year low of 450,000 barrels a day in 2020, few anticipated the size of its rebound. But it doubled in five years. Now, I expect the post-Maduro nation to surprise positively in the short term, and negatively in the long run.

    The Monagas basin is also known as the Eastern basin. In addition, two other basins are important: the Falcon basin, which is related to the Maracaibo one, and the Barinas-Apure, in the south of the country. Additional resources are located offshore in the Caribbean Sea. View in article.

#38

Off the Record / Re: US - Greenland Crisis Thre...

Last post by Josquius - Today at 03:16:35 PM

As for Greenland - it seems the current US play is to spend money to seduce the Greenland population (and especially amenable Greenland politicians) into separating from Denmark and submitting to American overlordship.

That's still not the action of an ally or a friend (obviously), but it is also less cataclysmic than forceful annexation.

Personally I believe the threat of force should still be taken seriously - but that that is also Trump's intention, because the threat of force is also an effective negotiation tactic. If Denmark / Greenland / Europe find themselves getting browbeat / persuaded into a peaceful semi-legal transfer of Greenland to US control, part of the items in the "plus" column for that outcome is averting the potential open fighting between the US and European militaries.

Curious they're trying it. This always struck me as a workable idea in such things. With Diego Garcia it seemed an obvious course too yet wasn't taken.

I mean, America has the money to make every Greenlander a multi millionaire.
I expect there'd be many of them quite happy to sell their country in exchange for $10 million each.

#39

Off the Record / Re: [Canada] Canadian Politics...

Last post by Bauer - Today at 02:37:32 PM

A lot of people get focused on work procedure rather than grasping the conceptual level, unfortunately.

#40

Off the Record / Re: [Canada] Canadian Politics...

Last post by HVC - Today at 02:33:27 PM

I am not sure if this is still accurate - but it used to be said there are three levels of understanding.

The first level is if you understand enough to make a note of what has been said*

I trained a guy, great guy mind you, but his note taking was the bane of my existence. I was training him as a replacement. And his notes were so damn detailed, in my view to a detrimental level. I gave a months notice so it's not like he was in a rush to note everything. Anyway, I digress, my main point of contention was that instead of understanding why or what he was doing he was so focused on writing that he wasn't catching on. I tried several times to gently guide him into focusing on why we were doing things but it was in vain. If he ever misplaced that notebook he'd be screwed

It could be just because I learn differently so I find it baffling, but I don't get people that learn by rote. One little change and they get flustered and screw everything up. And I know a lot of people that learn that way.