Quote from: Zoupa on July 18, 2025, 05:57:23 PMAnswer to your first question: I don't know, data is insufficient.
Quote from: viper37 on Today at 01:46:37 PMSo, I kept hearing about this series Barbarians, how historical consultants were hired for the 1st season and all quit thereafter because it was so bad, and the 2nd season was trash.My wife's Italian grandmother went to see what she thought was "Murder Inc" many years ago but instead it was MOnsters Inc. She said it was good but not what she was expecting. Don't think she realized the error, though everyone else did.
I kept telling myself "this wasn't actually that bad? I quite liked this actually. It didn't seem so historically inaccurate. It skimmed on the details here and there, maybe got a few things wrong, but it was actually decently done.
Ah, but here where I was wrong... What I saw was Barbarians rising... Totally not the same thing!
Quote from: grumbler on Today at 08:25:14 AMQuote from: viper37 on July 18, 2025, 11:12:16 PMWill they placate him or will they fight?
It's a 10 billion$ lawsuit, so totally frivolous. There's a lot of anger toward Trump from the Q-Anon Maga. Murdoch could exploit the anger and turn against Trump to make a killing out there.
They'll fight until the point where Trump has to make his sworn deposition in the case (when the defense will get to ask him all about his relationship with Epstein, under oath) and Trump drops the suit. Suing was the most moronic possible response to the WSJ piece, because it opens up Trump's relations with Epstein during discovery.
Quote from: viper37 on July 18, 2025, 02:25:39 PMQuote from: Valmy on July 17, 2025, 02:37:25 PMMaybe they were just good friends?Yup. Every man has a good friend who lets him fondle her breasts.
Page created in 0.018 seconds with 11 queries.