So, let me explain. In the paper this morning there's an article about the changes between the Bush II administration and Obama's.
In one section, it starts to deal with Dick Cheney, mentioning some quite outrageous stuff about a senate comittee hearing that could have been written by Hans on a bad hair day. This quotes are lifted from an article by a NYT columnist, called Maureen Dowd (Article: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/opinion/29dowd.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=vice%27s%20vices&st=cse (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/opinion/29dowd.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=vice%27s%20vices&st=cse)), which I checked and made stuff seem even more outrageous.
So, my question. What's the deal with her? Is that serious or was she pulling the collective leg of the readers? Has the columnist in the paper I read fallen for a satyrical article as if he was a Chinese news source fooled by The Onion?
Quite obviously she's a witch.
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fnymag.com%2Fimages%2F2%2Fdaily%2Fintel%2F08%2F05%2F06_dowd_lgl.jpg&hash=fa1789eb2a574fb0eed31eab253aa62d3e44f438)
Quote from: The Larch on May 21, 2009, 04:01:31 AM
So, let me explain. In the paper this morning there's an article about the changes between the Bush II administration and Obama's.
In one section, it starts to deal with Dick Cheney, mentioning some quite outrageous stuff about a senate comittee hearing that could have been written by Hans on a bad hair day. This quotes are lifted from an article by a NYT columnist, called Maureen Dowd (Article: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/opinion/29dowd.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=vice%27s%20vices&st=cse (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/opinion/29dowd.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=vice%27s%20vices&st=cse)), which I checked and made stuff seem even more outrageous.
So, my question. What's the deal with her? Is that serious or was she pulling the collective leg of the readers? Has the columnist in the paper I read fallen for a satyrical article as if he was a Chinese news source fooled by The Onion?
Larchie, are you serious? Don't know who Jack Bauer is? And Syed Ali? Try this link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_characters_in_24#Season_Two_2
Wait, did some moron at whatever pathetic rag Larch reads actually believe that that shit was real?
Quote from: Alatriste on May 21, 2009, 04:26:14 AM
Quote from: The Larch on May 21, 2009, 04:01:31 AM
So, let me explain. In the paper this morning there's an article about the changes between the Bush II administration and Obama's.
In one section, it starts to deal with Dick Cheney, mentioning some quite outrageous stuff about a senate comittee hearing that could have been written by Hans on a bad hair day. This quotes are lifted from an article by a NYT columnist, called Maureen Dowd (Article: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/opinion/29dowd.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=vice%27s%20vices&st=cse (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/opinion/29dowd.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=vice%27s%20vices&st=cse)), which I checked and made stuff seem even more outrageous.
So, my question. What's the deal with her? Is that serious or was she pulling the collective leg of the readers? Has the columnist in the paper I read fallen for a satyrical article as if he was a Chinese news source fooled by The Onion?
Larchie, are you serious? Don't know who Jack Bauer is? And Syed Ali? Try this link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_characters_in_24#Season_Two_2
Haven't seen "24". :P The Jack Bauer mention I got. :lol:
Blame Carlos Fuentes, he fell for it. ;)
Carlos Fuentes :bleeding:
Quote from: The Larch on May 21, 2009, 04:32:51 AM
Quote from: Alatriste on May 21, 2009, 04:26:14 AM
Quote from: The Larch on May 21, 2009, 04:01:31 AM
So, my question. What's the deal with her? Is that serious or was she pulling the collective leg of the readers? Has the columnist in the paper I read fallen for a satyrical article as if he was a Chinese news source fooled by The Onion?
Larchie, are you serious? Don't know who Jack Bauer is? And Syed Ali? Try this link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_characters_in_24#Season_Two_2
Haven't seen "24". :P The Jack Bauer mention I got. :lol:
Blame Carlos Fuentes, he fell for it. ;)
Oh, man, I have just read Fuentes' article. He fell for it hook, line, and sinker... :lol:
Quote from: Alatriste on May 21, 2009, 06:17:54 AMOh, man, I have just read Fuentes' article. He fell for it hook, line, and sinker... :lol:
I guess he didn't watch 24 either. :lol:
Maureen Dowd is a cunt. And unreadable.
Quote from: Ed Anger on May 21, 2009, 06:46:32 AM
Maureen Dowd is a cunt. And unreadable.
I could perfectly picture some of her mock Cheney quotes being said by people here, so make of that what you will. :lol:
Quote from: The Larch on May 21, 2009, 04:01:31 AM
So, let me explain. In the paper this morning there's an article about the changes between the Bush II administration and Obama's.
In one section, it starts to deal with Dick Cheney, mentioning some quite outrageous stuff about a senate comittee hearing that could have been written by Hans on a bad hair day. This quotes are lifted from an article by a NYT columnist, called Maureen Dowd (Article: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/opinion/29dowd.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=vice%27s%20vices&st=cse (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/opinion/29dowd.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=vice%27s%20vices&st=cse)), which I checked and made stuff seem even more outrageous.
So, my question. What's the deal with her? Is that serious or was she pulling the collective leg of the readers? Has the columnist in the paper I read fallen for a satyrical article as if he was a Chinese news source fooled by The Onion?
its satire dude.
Quote from: The Brain on May 21, 2009, 05:10:52 AM
Carlos Fuentes :bleeding:
Something about genius that makes your eyes bleed? -_-
:lmfao:
I've just written a letter to the director calling them on it. :ph34r:
heh. if you get a reply, plse post it.
Quote from: saskganesh on May 21, 2009, 11:08:37 AM
heh. if you get a reply, plse post it.
Well, it got published today.