Enquiry regarding a NYT writer: Help a brutha out

[The Larch]

So, let me explain. In the paper this morning there's an article about the changes between the Bush II administration and Obama's.

In one section, it starts to deal with Dick Cheney, mentioning some quite outrageous stuff about a senate comittee hearing that could have been written by Hans on a bad hair day. This quotes are lifted from an article by a NYT columnist, called Maureen Dowd (Article: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/opinion/29dowd.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=vice%27s%20vices&st=cse), which I checked and made stuff seem even more outrageous.

So, my question. What's the deal with her? Is that serious or was she pulling the collective leg of the readers? Has the columnist in the paper I read fallen for a satyrical article as if he was a Chinese news source fooled by The Onion?

[Syt]

Quite obviously she's a witch.

[Alatriste]

So, let me explain. In the paper this morning there's an article about the changes between the Bush II administration and Obama's.

In one section, it starts to deal with Dick Cheney, mentioning some quite outrageous stuff about a senate comittee hearing that could have been written by Hans on a bad hair day. This quotes are lifted from an article by a NYT columnist, called Maureen Dowd (Article: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/opinion/29dowd.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=vice%27s%20vices&st=cse), which I checked and made stuff seem even more outrageous.

So, my question. What's the deal with her? Is that serious or was she pulling the collective leg of the readers? Has the columnist in the paper I read fallen for a satyrical article as if he was a Chinese news source fooled by The Onion?

Larchie, are you serious? Don't know who Jack Bauer is? And Syed Ali? Try this link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_characters_in_24#Season_Two_2

[The Brain]

Wait, did some moron at whatever pathetic rag Larch reads actually believe that that shit was real?

[The Larch]

So, let me explain. In the paper this morning there's an article about the changes between the Bush II administration and Obama's.

In one section, it starts to deal with Dick Cheney, mentioning some quite outrageous stuff about a senate comittee hearing that could have been written by Hans on a bad hair day. This quotes are lifted from an article by a NYT columnist, called Maureen Dowd (Article: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/opinion/29dowd.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=vice%27s%20vices&st=cse), which I checked and made stuff seem even more outrageous.

So, my question. What's the deal with her? Is that serious or was she pulling the collective leg of the readers? Has the columnist in the paper I read fallen for a satyrical article as if he was a Chinese news source fooled by The Onion?

Larchie, are you serious? Don't know who Jack Bauer is? And Syed Ali? Try this link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_characters_in_24#Season_Two_2

Haven't seen "24".  The Jack Bauer mention I got. 
Blame Carlos Fuentes, he fell for it. 

[The Brain]

Carlos Fuentes

[Alatriste]

So, my question. What's the deal with her? Is that serious or was she pulling the collective leg of the readers? Has the columnist in the paper I read fallen for a satyrical article as if he was a Chinese news source fooled by The Onion?

Larchie, are you serious? Don't know who Jack Bauer is? And Syed Ali? Try this link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_characters_in_24#Season_Two_2

Haven't seen "24".  The Jack Bauer mention I got. 
Blame Carlos Fuentes, he fell for it. 

Oh, man, I have just read Fuentes' article. He fell for it hook, line, and sinker... 

[The Larch]

Oh, man, I have just read Fuentes' article. He fell for it hook, line, and sinker... 

I guess he didn't watch 24 either. 

[Ed Anger]

Maureen Dowd is a cunt. And unreadable.

[The Larch]

Maureen Dowd is a cunt. And unreadable.

I could perfectly picture some of her mock Cheney quotes being said by people here, so make of that what you will. 

[saskganesh]

So, let me explain. In the paper this morning there's an article about the changes between the Bush II administration and Obama's.

In one section, it starts to deal with Dick Cheney, mentioning some quite outrageous stuff about a senate comittee hearing that could have been written by Hans on a bad hair day. This quotes are lifted from an article by a NYT columnist, called Maureen Dowd (Article: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/opinion/29dowd.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=vice%27s%20vices&st=cse), which I checked and made stuff seem even more outrageous.

So, my question. What's the deal with her? Is that serious or was she pulling the collective leg of the readers? Has the columnist in the paper I read fallen for a satyrical article as if he was a Chinese news source fooled by The Onion?

its satire dude.

[Valmy]

Carlos Fuentes

Something about genius that makes your eyes bleed?

[derspiess]

 

[The Larch]

I've just written a letter to the director calling them on it. 

[saskganesh]

heh. if you get a reply, plse post it.