Languish.org

General Category => Off the Record => Topic started by: jimmy olsen on February 19, 2012, 06:09:31 AM

Title: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: jimmy olsen on February 19, 2012, 06:09:31 AM
I become more and more convinced that this is the year that open conflict will break out.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-17083791

Quote18 February 2012 Last updated at 10:35 GMT
Share this page


Iran warships enter Mediterranean via Suez Canal

Iranian warships have entered the Mediterranean Sea for only the second time since the 1979 revolution.

The destroyer Shahid Qandi and its supply vessel Kharg have passed through the Suez Canal but their destination remains unclear.

Navy chief Admiral Habibollah Sayari told the Irna agency the mission was a show of might and a "message of peace".

Two Iranian navy vessels entered the Mediterranean in February last year. Israel called it a "provocation".

Admiral Sayari was quoted by Irna as saying: "The strategic navy of the Islamic Republic of Iran has passed through the Suez Canal for the second time since the Islamic Revolution."

The mission conveyed "the might" of Iran to regional countries and Tehran's "message of peace and friendship".

The ships were reported to have docked earlier at Jeddah in Saudi Arabia.

Reuters quoted a source at the Suez Canal authority as saying the vessels might be en route to Syria.

The mission comes amid heightened tension between Iran and Israel.

Iran has recently announced developments in its nuclear programme, prompting some speculation Israel may launch an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities.

Israel has also blamed Iran for recent attacks on Israeli targets in Georgia and India, an accusation Tehran denies.
Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: Eddie Teach on February 19, 2012, 06:57:19 AM
How hard would it be for the Israelis to send the ship to the bottom?
Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: Darth Wagtaros on February 19, 2012, 07:39:12 AM
Not like that's a US destroyer Peter.
Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on February 19, 2012, 07:45:13 AM
Oh is this their little tiny 3-4000 ton "destroyer" they've built themselves? 
Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: Neil on February 19, 2012, 09:45:52 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on February 19, 2012, 07:45:13 AM
Oh is this their little tiny 3-4000 ton "destroyer" they've built themselves?
It's not like that's laughably small for a destroyer.  Other countries have older destroyers in that range, and the difference between frigates, destroyers and cruisers varies from country to country.  It's no longer a simple matter of size.
Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: Darth Wagtaros on February 19, 2012, 12:13:21 PM
What does grumbler think of this? He's been involved with navies since the divine wind wrecked the Mongols' invasion plans.
Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: Eddie Teach on February 19, 2012, 12:25:32 PM
Quote from: Darth Wagtaros on February 19, 2012, 12:13:21 PM
What does grumbler think of this? He's been involved with navies since the divine wind wrecked the Mongols' invasion plans.

Eh, I'm pretty sure it was grumbler that told Themistocles they ought to build some more ships.
Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: citizen k on February 19, 2012, 12:55:23 PM
So Grumbler's the one that bankrupted Greece.


Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: Siege on February 19, 2012, 03:22:12 PM
Don't confuse Greece with the League of Delos.

Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on February 19, 2012, 03:31:37 PM
Quote from: Neil on February 19, 2012, 09:45:52 AM
It's not like that's laughably small for a destroyer.  Other countries have older destroyers in that range, and the difference between frigates, destroyers and cruisers varies from country to country.  It's no longer a simple matter of size.

This is not it, and I was wrong about the size (I was thinking about a joke made about it/an aircraft carrier of theirs they want to build).  Their little tiny destroyer is 1,400 tons, not 3-4k.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fprevious.presstv.ir%2Fphoto%2F20110923%2Frabbani20110923091712217.jpg&hash=9bf3e2d577df8ca87ff49c1c6913e985c30e1215)
Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: Neil on February 19, 2012, 03:39:40 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on February 19, 2012, 03:31:37 PM
Quote from: Neil on February 19, 2012, 09:45:52 AM
It's not like that's laughably small for a destroyer.  Other countries have older destroyers in that range, and the difference between frigates, destroyers and cruisers varies from country to country.  It's no longer a simple matter of size.

This is not it, and I was wrong about the size (I was thinking about a joke made about it/an aircraft carrier of theirs they want to build).  Their little tiny destroyer is 1,400 tons, not 3-4k.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fprevious.presstv.ir%2Fphoto%2F20110923%2Frabbani20110923091712217.jpg&hash=9bf3e2d577df8ca87ff49c1c6913e985c30e1215)
That's huge for a WWI destroyer.
Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on February 19, 2012, 03:40:43 PM
Quote from: Neil on February 19, 2012, 03:39:40 PM
That's huge for a WWI destroyer.

:lol:
Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: Siege on February 19, 2012, 03:48:32 PM
About the size of an israeli Sa'ar corvette?
Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on February 19, 2012, 03:52:46 PM
I think so, yes.
Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: Tonitrus on February 19, 2012, 03:59:07 PM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on February 19, 2012, 06:09:31 AM

The destroyer Shahid Qandi and its supply vessel Kharg have passed through the Suez Canal but their destination remains unclear.


Their Klingon allies only sent a supply vessel?  :(
Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: PDH on February 19, 2012, 04:48:04 PM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on February 19, 2012, 03:31:37 PM

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fprevious.presstv.ir%2Fphoto%2F20110923%2Frabbani20110923091712217.jpg&hash=9bf3e2d577df8ca87ff49c1c6913e985c30e1215)

Where are the other 75?
Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: Baron von Schtinkenbutt on February 19, 2012, 05:27:26 PM
Quote from: Neil on February 19, 2012, 09:45:52 AM
Quote from: MadBurgerMaker on February 19, 2012, 07:45:13 AM
Oh is this their little tiny 3-4000 ton "destroyer" they've built themselves?
It's not like that's laughably small for a destroyer.  Other countries have older destroyers in that range, and the difference between frigates, destroyers and cruisers varies from country to country.  It's no longer a simple matter of size.

The RN has been classifying destroyers (AAW) and frigates (ASW) by role for decades, meaning RN frigates are consistently larger than RN destroyers.
Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: MadBurgerMaker on February 19, 2012, 05:47:57 PM
Quote from: Baron von Schtinkenbutt on February 19, 2012, 05:27:26 PM
The RN has been classifying destroyers (AAW) and frigates (ASW) by role for decades, meaning RN frigates are consistently larger than RN destroyers.

They went away from that with that new Daring of theirs though.  That thing is pretty good sized. 

Speaking of destroyers, I remember being very impressed with the Arleigh Burkes I saw while underway.  They're big and they're really surprisingly fast, and accelerate like they have a damn gas pedal.  They can just take off, and they can also turn quite well.  Obviously this is stuff a destroyer should be able to do, but it was just rather impressive at the time, mostly because of how hefty they are.

The OHP frigates were/are also pretty long, but they don't have that same...bulk...to them.   There was also a coast guard high endurance cutter, but the only thing that impressed me about that was that their crewmen got to wear shorts.  :P

Something weird is happening.  Every time I submit/save, I'm losing like half of the post.  The last one just stopped about halfway through a sentence.  I guess it could be something on my end.  Hm.
Title: Re: Iranian navy in the Med; only 2nd time since '79
Post by: garbon on February 19, 2012, 09:06:47 PM
Peace and friendship? :x