Languish.org

General Category => Off the Record => Topic started by: Valmy on November 09, 2011, 09:56:34 PM

Title: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Valmy on November 09, 2011, 09:56:34 PM
Ok schadenfreude is strong with me: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zUA2rDVrmNg

LOL 'oops'
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Razgovory on November 09, 2011, 09:58:40 PM
Maybe he should write it in on his hand.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Habsburg on November 09, 2011, 10:30:06 PM
Big kudos to the CNBC team, best debate to date.

Perry is done.

Romney looked good.  Calling the Student/Tibetian killing Oligarchs "currency manipulators" priceless.  :wub: :worthy:

Gingrich had his moments, but Nasty Newt was there for a bit.  I hate him too much to offer further review.
Poor Santorum, too dumb to understand it's time to go.
Love Huntsman, but he's not making traction.

Cain's "Princess Nancy" comment poor judgment, but consider the source.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Razgovory on November 09, 2011, 10:55:22 PM
I wonder who it was that said "Oh my..." at the end of your video, Valmy.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 09, 2011, 11:28:12 PM
4 more years! 4 more years!
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: merithyn on November 09, 2011, 11:36:07 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 09, 2011, 11:28:12 PM
4 more years! 4 more years!

No shit. The alternative is terrifying... :ph34r:
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Razgovory on November 09, 2011, 11:49:02 PM
My money is still on the Mormon.  The first one.  Not the other one.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Habsburg on November 10, 2011, 01:20:50 AM
I'll bet Christie is kicking his advisors about now.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: jimmy olsen on November 10, 2011, 01:46:14 AM
No way he comes back now.

Romney is definitely going to win the nomination.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Ideologue on November 10, 2011, 02:02:33 AM
Couldn't come up with an agency to get rid of on the fly?  Hell, I could come up with like eight.

IRS
Missile Defense Agency
DARPA
Labor
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
Secret Service
Peace Corps
DHS

There, that was less time.  I don't think any should actually be gotten rid of, but I look less foolish, and I'm pretty positive the IRS is the one he meant.

Update: Oops, nope, he meant the Department of Energy.

P.S. What's so bad about the Department of Commerce?  Yeah, fuck the National Weather Service!
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Richard Hakluyt on November 10, 2011, 05:45:15 AM
It was such a useless agency, that did so little, the name momentarily escaped him  :P
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Tamas on November 10, 2011, 07:33:51 AM
Quote from: Habsburg on November 09, 2011, 10:30:06 PM
Big kudos to the CNBC team, best debate to date.

Perry is done.

Romney looked good.  Calling the Student/Tibetian killing Oligarchs "currency manipulators" priceless.  :wub: :worthy:

Gingrich had his moments, but Nasty Newt was there for a bit.  I hate him too much to offer further review.
Poor Santorum, too dumb to understand it's time to go.
Love Huntsman, but he's not making traction.

Cain's "Princess Nancy" comment poor judgment, but consider the source.

What about: Ron Paul?

If the Wall Street protesters are being opressed by the elite via attempts to ridicule, Ron is being holocausted
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 10, 2011, 07:46:25 AM
Ron Paul won't win because he won't say everything primary voters want to hear. They may be receptive to his economic message this time around, but not his foreign policy. And all the other major candidates are basically echoing his economic views.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: alfred russel on November 10, 2011, 09:00:48 AM
What I loved was when he was obviously struggling, one of the moderators (Maria Bartiromo?) immediately started to move on to deficit reduction. If the other moderator didn't jump in to press on the point, Perry would have slid.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Razgovory on November 10, 2011, 09:05:49 AM
Quote from: Tamas on November 10, 2011, 07:33:51 AM


What about: Ron Paul?

If the Wall Street protesters are being opressed by the elite via attempts to ridicule, Ron is being holocausted

Well, it doesn't help that Paul is crazy.  Like claiming the CIA has launched a coup and overthrown the US government crazy.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: KRonn on November 10, 2011, 12:23:18 PM
Perry should have had this down cold. The third agency was energy, I'm sure. The energy dept had a lot of say in the Gulf cleanup which affected Texas, so if Perry had issues with how that dept handled things it should have been a no brainer for him to discuss.

Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: crazy canuck on November 10, 2011, 12:26:58 PM
That was so, um, what was that word, um, you know, um, funny.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Malthus on November 10, 2011, 12:28:13 PM
WTF? Surely in a country as vast as America, the Republicans can dig up *some* candidates with brains?  :huh:
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Valmy on November 10, 2011, 12:33:52 PM
Quote from: Malthus on November 10, 2011, 12:28:13 PM
WTF? Surely in a country as vast as America, the Republicans can dig up *some* candidates with brains?  :huh:

Everybody with brains knows running for President is a horrible idea.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Sheilbh on November 10, 2011, 12:35:36 PM
Quote from: Malthus on November 10, 2011, 12:28:13 PM
WTF? Surely in a country as vast as America, the Republicans can dig up *some* candidates with brains?  :huh:
Seriously.  I feel sorry for Perry and this makes me warm to him on a personal level, but sweet Jesus this was meant to be the conservative saviour from Romney :blink:

I can't understand how the Republican have managed to do this.  They've got a winnable Presidential election and the only people competing for it are either hugely unloved/unloveable (Romney, Huntsman, possibly Gingrich) or make Mike Gravel look like a sensible, grounded, disciplined candidate.

Also Texas.  WTF?
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Habbaku on November 10, 2011, 12:38:50 PM
Quote from: Sheilbh on November 10, 2011, 12:35:36 PM
I can't understand how the Republican have managed to do this.  They've got a winnable Presidential election and the only people competing for it are either hugely unloved/unloveable (Romney, Huntsman, possibly Gingrich) or make Mike Gravel look like a sensible, grounded, disciplined candidate.

This reminds me a lot of the 2004 election, actually.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Valmy on November 10, 2011, 12:39:10 PM
Quote from: Sheilbh on November 10, 2011, 12:35:36 PM
Also Texas.  WTF?

We are a one party state.  Perry was just one of dudes swept into office along with George W Bush in the 1994 red storm.  Bush ran for President so he became Governor and the Republican machine has crushed any conservative who has tried to oppose him.  Ergo even though he is generally regarded as an incompetent and corrupt we are powerless to get rid of him.  I am just amazed the National Republicans didn't know it.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: The Minsky Moment on November 10, 2011, 12:54:50 PM
Quote from: Sheilbh on November 10, 2011, 12:35:36 PM
Also Texas.  WTF?

Texas governors don't have a lot of power.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Valmy on November 10, 2011, 12:59:03 PM
Quote from: The Minsky Moment on November 10, 2011, 12:54:50 PM
Texas governors don't have a lot of power.

Yep.  That is the other thing.  People keep wanting to give Perry credit for Texas' successes which is sorta like giving the George VI credit for winning WWII.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: garbon on November 10, 2011, 01:06:03 PM
Quote from: Habsburg on November 09, 2011, 10:30:06 PM
Cain's "Princess Nancy" comment poor judgment, but consider the source.

Never poor judgment to blast Pelosi.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: garbon on November 10, 2011, 01:09:14 PM
Quote from: Habbaku on November 10, 2011, 12:38:50 PM
Quote from: Sheilbh on November 10, 2011, 12:35:36 PM
I can't understand how the Republican have managed to do this.  They've got a winnable Presidential election and the only people competing for it are either hugely unloved/unloveable (Romney, Huntsman, possibly Gingrich) or make Mike Gravel look like a sensible, grounded, disciplined candidate.

This reminds me a lot of the 2004 election, actually.

Kerry was better than beige! :angry:
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Razgovory on November 10, 2011, 04:31:39 PM
Quote from: Malthus on November 10, 2011, 12:28:13 PM
WTF? Surely in a country as vast as America, the Republicans can dig up *some* candidates with brains?  :huh:

I don't think the GOP is overly interested in brains.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 10, 2011, 07:28:44 PM
Finally heard a clip of this on NPR.  Boy o boy Perry sounds like an idjit.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Jaron on November 10, 2011, 08:33:59 PM
John Huntsman will set this nation right.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Siege on November 11, 2011, 01:40:49 AM
Quote from: Valmy on November 09, 2011, 09:56:34 PM
Ok schadenfreude is strong with me: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zUA2rDVrmNg

LOL 'oops'

Oh please.

Go and suck Obama's cock, faggot.

Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: CountDeMoney on November 11, 2011, 07:49:56 AM
Perry's been done;  he just hasn't figured out how to go home.  I don't know why he was even getting the support he was getting in the beginning.  An inarticulate, anti-intellectual Texas governor frat boy, running for president because he's got nothing better to do? WHAT COULD HAPPEN

I admire Huntsman, as much as I can admire someone from that fucked up party, but he's broke and the Tea Baggers will never let him get past the primary.

And if Mitt Romney keeps showing his true colors as a Republican that doesn't always buy his party's own bullshit, who knows what could happen.  I despise Mormons, but in the end, if he and his freaky cultist wants to pad around like extras in Defending Your Life and baptising dead people, meh.  Uber Christian fundies like Bachmann are even more dangerous.

They bitch about Romney not having "core values".  I see him as someone who sees everything as up for negotiation.  Maybe that's what we need now:  less intransigent demagoguery, more deal-making.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Valmy on November 11, 2011, 08:40:42 AM
Quote from: Siege on November 11, 2011, 01:40:49 AM
Oh please.

Go and suck Obama's cock, faggot.

LOL.  You do realize that Perry's penchant for gay sex is one of Texas' worst kept secrets right?
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: FunkMonk on November 11, 2011, 09:15:40 AM
Is Siege allowed to vote?
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Grey Fox on November 11, 2011, 09:20:53 AM
Quote from: FunkMonk on November 11, 2011, 09:15:40 AM
Is Siege allowed to vote?

Yes, unless the election is on a Friday.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: DGuller on November 11, 2011, 09:21:27 AM
Quote from: FunkMonk on November 11, 2011, 09:15:40 AM
Is Siege allowed to vote?
Yes.  Literacy tests were ruled unconstitutional.  :(
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: FunkMonk on November 11, 2011, 09:22:03 AM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Tonitrus on November 11, 2011, 01:53:59 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on November 11, 2011, 07:49:56 AM
pad around like extras in Defending Your Life and baptising dead people, meh. 

Hah, strange reference to pull out, as that movie is pretty much non-Morman/Christian.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 11, 2011, 04:09:54 PM
Quote from: Tonitrus on November 11, 2011, 01:53:59 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on November 11, 2011, 07:49:56 AM
pad around like extras in Defending Your Life and baptising dead people, meh. 

Hah, strange reference to pull out, as that movie is pretty much non-Morman/Christian.

Kind of Buddhist-like, except nirvana is replaced with heaven.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Ideologue on November 11, 2011, 06:25:29 PM
I haven't seen an Albert Brooks movie in a while.  They were good, though.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Caliga on November 11, 2011, 07:57:37 PM
Quote from: Ideologue on November 11, 2011, 06:25:29 PM
I haven't seen an Albert Brooks movie in a while.  They were good, though.
Guy annoys me for some reason.  His bro is way cooler.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Tonitrus on November 11, 2011, 08:27:07 PM
Quote from: Ideologue on November 11, 2011, 06:25:29 PM
I haven't seen an Albert Brooks movie in a while.  They were good, though.

Not a huge fan of Albert Brooks, but for some reason I rather like "Defending Your Life".
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 11, 2011, 08:29:34 PM
Just saw Perry's new ad during the Carrier Classic.

"I'm a doer, not a talker."

:lol:
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: DGuller on November 11, 2011, 08:32:01 PM
At least he got half of it right, which is better than what he usually bats.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 11, 2011, 08:42:00 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 11, 2011, 08:40:42 AM
LOL.  You do realize that Perry's penchant for gay sex is one of Texas' worst kept secrets right?

You don't seem to be trying very hard. :contract:
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Valmy on November 11, 2011, 11:10:05 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on November 11, 2011, 08:42:00 PM
Quote from: Valmy on November 11, 2011, 08:40:42 AM
LOL.  You do realize that Perry's penchant for gay sex is one of Texas' worst kept secrets right?

You don't seem to be trying very hard. :contract:

I can't keep secrets.  It is a personality flaw.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Sheilbh on November 12, 2011, 09:52:37 AM
Quote from: Valmy on November 11, 2011, 08:40:42 AMLOL.  You do realize that Perry's penchant for gay sex is one of Texas' worst kept secrets right?
That makes sense.  I've seen a couple of videos of him - even during these debates - and he gives off a Marcus Bachman vibe.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Martinus on November 12, 2011, 01:35:55 PM
Quote from: Sheilbh on November 12, 2011, 09:52:37 AM
Quote from: Valmy on November 11, 2011, 08:40:42 AMLOL.  You do realize that Perry's penchant for gay sex is one of Texas' worst kept secrets right?
That makes sense.  I've seen a couple of videos of him - even during these debates - and he gives off a Marcus Bachman vibe.
He does? He looks too stupid to be gay, to me.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Admiral Yi on November 12, 2011, 01:43:31 PM
That means Perez Hilton must be straight too.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Richard Hakluyt on November 12, 2011, 04:43:36 PM
Quote from: Martinus on November 12, 2011, 01:35:55 PM
Quote from: Sheilbh on November 12, 2011, 09:52:37 AM
Quote from: Valmy on November 11, 2011, 08:40:42 AMLOL.  You do realize that Perry's penchant for gay sex is one of Texas' worst kept secrets right?
That makes sense.  I've seen a couple of videos of him - even during these debates - and he gives off a Marcus Bachman vibe.
He does? He looks too stupid to be gay, to me.

Maybe he can use that as a defence if the merdia out him  :cool:


[note : accidentally added an "r" to media there, on reflection I decided that I rather liked the new word so left it in]


Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Eddie Teach on November 12, 2011, 05:58:20 PM
Quote from: Richard Hakluyt on November 12, 2011, 04:43:36 PM
Maybe he can use that as a defence if the merdia out him  :cool:


[note : accidentally added an "r" to media there, on reflection I decided that I rather liked the new word so left it in]

Because you think they're full of merde?
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: dps on November 12, 2011, 06:46:16 PM
Quote from: Richard Hakluyt on November 12, 2011, 04:43:36 PM
Quote from: Martinus on November 12, 2011, 01:35:55 PM
Quote from: Sheilbh on November 12, 2011, 09:52:37 AM
Quote from: Valmy on November 11, 2011, 08:40:42 AMLOL.  You do realize that Perry's penchant for gay sex is one of Texas' worst kept secrets right?
That makes sense.  I've seen a couple of videos of him - even during these debates - and he gives off a Marcus Bachman vibe.
He does? He looks too stupid to be gay, to me.

Maybe he can use that as a defence if the merdia out him  :cool:


[note : accidentally added an "r" to media there, on reflection I decided that I rather liked the new word so left it in]




Well, now we know how Marti stays in the closet at work.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Ideologue on November 12, 2011, 09:59:32 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: Siege on November 13, 2011, 01:20:29 AM
Quote from: Martinus on November 12, 2011, 01:35:55 PM
Quote from: Sheilbh on November 12, 2011, 09:52:37 AM
Quote from: Valmy on November 11, 2011, 08:40:42 AMLOL.  You do realize that Perry's penchant for gay sex is one of Texas' worst kept secrets right?
That makes sense.  I've seen a couple of videos of him - even during these debates - and he gives off a Marcus Bachman vibe.
He does? He looks too stupid to be gay, to me.

Then there is no way you are gay!


Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: CountDeMoney on November 13, 2011, 06:33:06 PM
Quote from: Tonitrus on November 11, 2011, 01:53:59 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on November 11, 2011, 07:49:56 AM
pad around like extras in Defending Your Life and baptising dead people, meh. 

Hah, strange reference to pull out, as that movie is pretty much non-Morman/Christian.

White bathrobes and slippers are still white bathrobes and slippers, even without Rip Torn.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: CountDeMoney on November 13, 2011, 06:34:36 PM
Quote from: Tonitrus on November 11, 2011, 08:27:07 PM
Quote from: Ideologue on November 11, 2011, 06:25:29 PM
I haven't seen an Albert Brooks movie in a while.  They were good, though.

Not a huge fan of Albert Brooks, but for some reason I rather like "Defending Your Life".

Yeah, it's a cute little flick.  And the first one that Meryl Streep actually looked good in since the 1970s.
Title: Re: Rick Perry 'oops'
Post by: CountDeMoney on November 13, 2011, 06:35:55 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on November 11, 2011, 08:29:34 PM
Just saw Perry's new ad during the Carrier Classic.

"I'm a doer, not a talker."

:lol:

Yeah, 8 years of that not so long ago was enough.