I wonder if there is a way to find out who have the largest number of LAST posts in all threads.
I would like to know who is that guy that kills interesting conversations.
The idea came after seing how the russian fighter thread got derailed by Neil and Minsky.
It's me. :cool:
Quote from: mongers on August 24, 2011, 07:11:12 PM
It's me. :cool:
:yes: Either you or that moron that kept posting his colored-in cartoons of non-existent ships in a thread about Soviet fighter panes.
Quote from: Siege on August 24, 2011, 07:08:13 PM
I wonder if there is a way to find out who have the largest number of LAST posts in all threads.
I would like to know who is that guy that kills interesting conversations.
The idea came after seing how the russian fighter thread got derailed by Neil and Minsky.
Fuck you. I derailed that thread.
Based on the first 250 odd threads of this iteration of Languish the answer is: ....... drum roll .....
DontSayBanana with 17 last posts.
Quote from: Ideologue on August 24, 2011, 07:20:18 PM
Quote from: Siege on August 24, 2011, 07:08:13 PM
I wonder if there is a way to find out who have the largest number of LAST posts in all threads.
I would like to know who is that guy that kills interesting conversations.
The idea came after seing how the russian fighter thread got derailed by Neil and Minsky.
Fuck you. I derailed that thread.
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1018.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Faf302%2FOverburdened%2F724you_win_the_prize.jpg&hash=61d5efb8a955e3f0cf726ed484f6f548eb4f385f)
I wouldn`t call having the last post in threads criteria for being worst poster. Could just as well mean you`re always late. Or you always say something so definitive and awesome that everyone agrees with you and can think of no reply.
Least times quoted would be a bit more accurate perhaps.
Quote from: Tyr on August 24, 2011, 07:39:27 PM
I wouldn`t call having the last post in threads criteria for being worst poster. Could just as well mean you`re always late. Or you always say something so definitive and awesome that everyone agrees with you and can think of no reply.
It could mean that you live in a different time zone than the majority, and therefore few are around when you post the most.
Captain Crunch.
BiB.
Quote from: mongers on August 24, 2011, 07:21:54 PM
Based on the first 250 odd threads of this iteration of Languish the answer is: ....... drum roll .....
DontSayBanana with 17 last posts.
You like me! You really like me! :smarty:
Quote from: Ideologue on August 24, 2011, 07:20:18 PM
Quote from: Siege on August 24, 2011, 07:08:13 PM
I wonder if there is a way to find out who have the largest number of LAST posts in all threads.
I would like to know who is that guy that kills interesting conversations.
The idea came after seing how the russian fighter thread got derailed by Neil and Minsky.
Fuck you. I derailed that thread.
You did? I'm not talking to you evah again!111
And fuck you too, bitch!
Quote from: Tyr on August 24, 2011, 07:39:27 PM
Least times quoted would be a bit more accurate perhaps.
That would probably be me. :lol:
The last thing of any intellectual significance or entertainment value that I posted was Vlad Putin singing Blueberry Hill, and even that was questionable.
Quote from: Valmy on August 24, 2011, 08:51:03 PM
Captain Crunch.
Aww, Crunchy, sweet and special. Good times.
Quote from: Tyr on August 24, 2011, 07:39:27 PM
Least times quoted would be a bit more accurate perhaps.
Nah. We love striking down people making outlandish remarks.
Quote from: Tyr on August 24, 2011, 07:39:27 PM
I wouldn`t call having the last post in threads criteria for being worst poster. Could just as well mean you`re always late. Or you always say something so definitive and awesome that everyone agrees with you and can think of no reply.
Least times quoted would be a bit more accurate perhaps.
I don't think that's right. Flip it around and that would make me the best poster because I've been quoted the most. Obviously an inaccurate means of assessment. :D
Quote from: jimmy olsen on August 25, 2011, 04:22:34 AM
Quote from: Tyr on August 24, 2011, 07:39:27 PM
I wouldn`t call having the last post in threads criteria for being worst poster. Could just as well mean you`re always late. Or you always say something so definitive and awesome that everyone agrees with you and can think of no reply.
Least times quoted would be a bit more accurate perhaps.
I don't think that's right. Flip it around and that would make me the best poster because I've been quoted the most. Obviously an inaccurate means of assessment. :D
Its the one an old uni teacher of mine used in her research into online communities.
I have found that threads about a subject that I actually care about (and are sometimes started by me), are shorter then ones I don't. I'm often the last poster in those threads as well.
I couldn't possibly pick one.
Roll a d100 and then count down the list of posters arranged by post count in descending order.
Quote from: Siege on August 24, 2011, 07:08:13 PM
The idea came after seing how the russian fighter thread got derailed by Neil and Minsky.
I accept the credit for that act of mercy.
Throught that timely intervention we saved the thread from a sure demise against long odds. It is still on the front page.
Can you kill the fatty thread?
Quote from: Ed Anger on August 25, 2011, 11:04:24 AM
Can you kill the fatty thread?
Seriously. Let's see what we can do about that crap.