Interesting article, anyone who's fought in the Mideast care to comment?
http://www.meforum.org/441/why-arabs-lose-wars
Just skimmed it.
So...they've been watching Lawrence of Arabia too much?
Tim.
This was already posted on this website. By Ank. Six years ago.
Anybody who has played a Arab-Israeli wargame can tell you arabs suck ass.
Huh. Apparently you can read it in Hungarian. I wonder what the purpose of that would be.
Quote from: Razgovory link=topic=4899.msg244442 #msg244442 date=1303172661
Tim.
This was already posted on this website. By Ank. Six years ago.
:rolleyes:
I think I can be forgiven for not remembering something that was posted here six years ago.
The article would have really benefitted from a longer discussion of the counter example of Yom Kippur.
Quote from: jimmy olsen on April 18, 2011, 07:38:28 PM
Quote from: Razgovory link=topic=4899.msg244442 #msg244442 date=1303172661
Tim.
This was already posted on this website. By Ank. Six years ago.
:rolleyes:
I think I can be forgiven for not remembering something that was posted here six years ago.
Yes. But not for posting 12-year old articles.
I wonder if the Army knows more about how Arabs fight now then they did in 1999.
Arabs lose wars because Islam keeps them in the Dark Ages. Duh.
I remember reading the same thing in EUOT.
Quote from: Monoriu on April 18, 2011, 09:21:10 PM
I remember reading the same thing in EUOT.
That article was published before EUOT existed. :lol:
EDIT: I am not doubting it was posted there I just realized how old it was.
This article was first published by a Byzanteen general.
Quote from: Admiral Yi on April 18, 2011, 07:49:37 PM
The article would have really benefitted from a longer discussion of the counter example of Yom Kippur.
Or the Soviets, on who's military many of the Arab armies based themselves on.
Survey says: JEWS.
You want the truth? Can you handle it?
They lose wars because they are an inferior race.
Quote from: Slargos on April 19, 2011, 11:25:29 AM
You want the truth? Can you handle it?
They lose wars because they are an inferior race.
So what is Sweden's excuse?
Quote from: Berkut on April 19, 2011, 11:29:23 AM
Quote from: Slargos on April 19, 2011, 11:25:29 AM
You want the truth? Can you handle it?
They lose wars because they are an inferior race.
So what is Sweden's excuse?
...who lost to
Slavs, no less. :yucky:
Quote from: Berkut on April 19, 2011, 11:29:23 AM
Quote from: Slargos on April 19, 2011, 11:25:29 AM
You want the truth? Can you handle it?
They lose wars because they are an inferior race.
So what is Sweden's excuse?
Cause they are an inferior race.
Quote from: Warspite on April 19, 2011, 11:38:11 AM
Quote from: Berkut on April 19, 2011, 11:29:23 AM
Quote from: Slargos on April 19, 2011, 11:25:29 AM
You want the truth? Can you handle it?
They lose wars because they are an inferior race.
So what is Sweden's excuse?
...who lost to Slavs, no less. :yucky:
In our defence, it took the combined armies of Poland, Russia, Prussia, Denmark and Saxony to finally defeat us and that was only by a fucking hair.
Quote from: Slargos on April 19, 2011, 12:34:47 PM
Quote from: Warspite on April 19, 2011, 11:38:11 AM
Quote from: Berkut on April 19, 2011, 11:29:23 AM
Quote from: Slargos on April 19, 2011, 11:25:29 AM
You want the truth? Can you handle it?
They lose wars because they are an inferior race.
So what is Sweden's excuse?
...who lost to Slavs, no less. :yucky:
In our defence, it took the combined armies of Poland, Russia, Prussia, Denmark and Saxony to finally defeat us and that was only by a fucking hair.
I thought your excuse was
"It took the combined armies of Poland, Russia, Prussia, Denmark and Saxony to finally defeat us and that was only by because King was hors de combat during the decisive battle."
Quote from: Viking on April 19, 2011, 01:25:19 PM
I thought your excuse was
"It took the combined armies of Poland, Russia, Prussia, Denmark and Saxony to finally defeat us and that was only by because King was hors de combat during the decisive battle."
If he was beating up whores at the time of the battle, no wonder your guys lost. :P
Quote from: Viking on April 19, 2011, 01:25:19 PM
"It took the combined armies of Poland, Russia, Prussia, Denmark and Saxony to finally defeat us and that was only by because King was hors de combat during the decisive battle."
:yes: Our king in the saddle would've won the day. Even with the gunpowder wet.
Quote from: Malthus on April 19, 2011, 02:25:07 PM
Quote from: Viking on April 19, 2011, 01:25:19 PM
I thought your excuse was
"It took the combined armies of Poland, Russia, Prussia, Denmark and Saxony to finally defeat us and that was only by because King was hors de combat during the decisive battle."
If he was beating up whores at the time of the battle, no wonder your guys lost. :P
His hors d'oeuvres still had to be obeyed.
:lol:
It's an answer in search of a question, or a solution in search of a problem.
I don't care why Arabs lose wars. They're always on the wrong damn side, anyway.
Quote from: Slargos on April 19, 2011, 12:34:47 PM
Quote from: Warspite on April 19, 2011, 11:38:11 AM
Quote from: Berkut on April 19, 2011, 11:29:23 AM
Quote from: Slargos on April 19, 2011, 11:25:29 AM
You want the truth? Can you handle it?
They lose wars because they are an inferior race.
So what is Sweden's excuse?
...who lost to Slavs, no less. :yucky:
In our defence, it took the combined armies of Poland, Russia, Prussia, Denmark and Saxony to finally defeat us and that was only by a fucking hair.
It's what you deserve for allying with the Turks.
Quote from: Scipio on April 19, 2011, 09:27:24 PM
It's an answer in search of a question, or a solution in search of a problem.
I don't care why Arabs lose wars. They're always on the wrong damn side, anyway.
I dunno - they seemed like they were on the right side in WWI. Larry of Arabia and all that...
Limey fag = right side?