Languish.org

General Category => Off the Record => Topic started by: Alatriste on April 08, 2010, 07:21:04 AM

Title: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Alatriste on April 08, 2010, 07:21:04 AM
From The Economist

http://www.economist.com/world/europe/displayStory.cfm?story_id=15810902&source=most_commented

You say Lwów, I say Lviv
A guide to Eastern Europe's most tedious arguments

Apr 1st 2010 | From The Economist online

LAST week’s column dealt with the arcane name squabble between Macedonia (aka FYROM) and Greece. This piece was soon the most-commented on the Economist’s website. That was no thanks to the brilliance of the prose and the lucidity of argument. The subject was one of those issues that attracts bigots, scaremongers and polemicists, with a vanishingly tangential relationship to truth, logic and courtesy.

The article described the row as “the most tedious dispute in the Balkans”. The ex-communist region sets a high standard in such matters, so the epithet is not to be bestowed lightly. Here is an outsider’s guide to a few of the other rows. All the arguments below are a) historically plausible and b) strike most outsiders as quite mad.

Moldova/Romania A sizeable number of Romanians believe that what is today called the Republic of Moldova is nothing more than a lost province of real Romania, snatched by Stalin out of spite (along with northern Bukovina, which went to Ukraine). The sooner this “pretend Moldova” rejoins Romania the better. Handing out passports to as many Moldovans as possible brings this nearer.

Bulgaria/Macedonia From a certain Bulgarian-nationalist viewpoint, the idea of a discrete Macedonian ethnicity or language is a nonsense—rather like defining “Texan” as an ethnicity in America. Yugoslav Macedonia was a historical accident, and the sooner the detritus joins Bulgaria the better. After that, it will be time to liberate the brother-Slavs of northern Greece.

Slovakia/Hungary According to hardline Slovak nationalists, the whole idea of a Hungarian ethnic minority in the country is absurd. These people (many of whom are Gypsies anyway) should shut up and get on with being Slovaks: ie, speaking Slovak and thinking like Slovaks. Any other behaviour is a sign that they are still imprisoned by their imperial mindset. If they don’t like living in Slovakia, they should go back to Hungary (where, incidentally, the Slovak-speaking minority has dwindled to nothing—proving that it is the Magyars who are the real ethno-nationalists).

Lithuania/Poland Not many people realise this, but most of the people speaking Polish and Belarussian in the area in and around Vilnius are not really Slavs but polonised Lithuanians, the legacy of centuries of forced assimilation. That is a terrible fate, so the right (and kindest) thing to do is to depolonise these people and relithuanianise them. A good way to start is to make sure that they do not get trapped into using foreign Polish letters and silly spellings when writing their names. It is Adomas Mickevicius, not Adam Mickiewicz. Let nobody forget it.

Ukraine/Poland Anyone who spells the capital of Galicia as Lwów is a Polish nationalist who bayonets Ukrainian babies for fun. Anyone who says it is spelled Lviv is a Ukrainian fascist who bayonets Polish babies for fun. Anyone who spells it Lvov is a Soviet mass murderer. And anyone who calls it Lemberg is a Nazi. See you in Leopolis for further discussion.

Among the runners-up: “Tatar” is a derogatory and invented name for the inhabitants of modern Tatarstan, who are in fact the descendants of Volga Bulgars. Kievan Rus was not Russian. Any talk of a Ruthenian nation is ill-informed, stupid, possibly mad and the product of Muscovite attempts to split and destroy Ukraine.

Outside pressure has mostly calmed these arguments within formal politics. But on the internet the rows still rage, with tortured facts, arguments and syntax, all mixed with vituperative insults, phoney politeness and seemingly RANDOM Use Of Capital letters. There is a whiff of pyjamas-at-noon, and of people who check their emails in the small hours. Time to get a life?

Note from Alatriste himself: Leopolis? I smell dirty Byzanteens at work :D
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: The Larch on April 08, 2010, 07:45:14 AM
Somebody should post that at P'dox OT and see what happens.  :lol:
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 07:47:56 AM
Also see: Danzig/Gdansk.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Tamas on April 08, 2010, 07:49:18 AM

:lol:

Oh how I would enjoy this part of the world if I wasn't living in it.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Faeelin on April 08, 2010, 08:02:31 AM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 07:47:56 AM
Also see: Danzig/Gdansk.

Does anyone really argue over this? What with the expulsion of all Germans, I thought it was pretty much accepted. (And the Germans feeling guilty about the whole attempted genocide of Poland thing).
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Neil on April 08, 2010, 08:11:57 AM
Quote from: Faeelin on April 08, 2010, 08:02:31 AM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 07:47:56 AM
Also see: Danzig/Gdansk.

Does anyone really argue over this? What with the expulsion of all Germans, I thought it was pretty much accepted. (And the Germans feeling guilty about the whole attempted genocide of Poland thing).
They should feel guilty for having failed.  More than anybody else, the Nazis are guilty for having subjected the world to Martinus.  Other than his parents, I suppose.

Still, a lot of problems would be solved if the old Hohenzollern, Habsburg and Ottoman empires were reconstructed.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Malthus on April 08, 2010, 08:22:24 AM
Quote from: Alatriste on April 08, 2010, 07:21:04 AM
Kievan Rus was not Russian. Any talk of a Ruthenian nation is ill-informed, stupid, possibly mad and the product of Muscovite attempts to split and destroy Ukraine.

I hear rants on this subject from my wife and her relations often enough. Any historical work or even novel that (somewhat anachronistically) refers to the Rus as "Russian" sends them into a fury.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Razgovory on April 08, 2010, 10:09:16 AM
QuoteThe EU is a more hopeful source of help. It is good at solving problems by being boring. Faced with the prospect of a near-death experience in a meeting room in Brussels, people often discover new possibilities for compromise.

:lmfao:
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 10:20:52 AM
Quote from: Malthus on April 08, 2010, 08:22:24 AM
I hear rants on this subject from my wife and her relations often enough. Any historical work or even novel that (somewhat anachronistically) refers to the Rus as "Russian" sends them into a fury.

The best part is, there is no other handy adjective in English that could substitute for "something or someone from Kievan Rus".

Anyway, the Ukrainians have only themselves to blame. Fuckers got conquered by ancestors of Martinus, and when they finally managed to free themselves they received heavy Muscovite help.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 10:22:16 AM
As for Gdansk/Danzig, eleven pages of archives (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gda%C5%84sk) (Lvov/Lviv has one). I rest my case.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: derspiess on April 08, 2010, 10:28:28 AM
I never put 2 & 2 together re: Lemberg = Lviv  :Embarrass:
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 10:33:17 AM
Quote from: derspiess on April 08, 2010, 10:28:28 AM
I never put 2 & 2 together re: Lemberg = Lviv  :Embarrass:

Germans tend to give weird and totally unrelated names to places they occupy.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Zanza on April 08, 2010, 10:34:03 AM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 10:22:16 AM
As for Gdansk/Danzig, eleven pages of archives (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gda%C5%84sk) (Lvov/Lviv has one). I rest my case.
Some tards fighting on Wikipedia is different from governments making policy based on names.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Zanza on April 08, 2010, 10:37:06 AM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 10:33:17 AMGermans tend to give weird and totally unrelated names to places they occupy.
What would be a related name? What does Lviv (or whatever) mean?
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 10:39:22 AM
Tards fighting on Wikipedia are often representative of the wider government policy where Eastern Europe is concerned.

As for Lvov, call it Löwenburg or something.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Malthus on April 08, 2010, 10:46:11 AM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 10:20:52 AM
Quote from: Malthus on April 08, 2010, 08:22:24 AM
I hear rants on this subject from my wife and her relations often enough. Any historical work or even novel that (somewhat anachronistically) refers to the Rus as "Russian" sends them into a fury.

The best part is, there is no other handy adjective in English that could substitute for "something or someone from Kievan Rus".

Anyway, the Ukrainians have only themselves to blame. Fuckers got conquered by ancestors of Martinus, and when they finally managed to free themselves they received heavy Muscovite help.

The real problem was earlier - getting creamed by the Mongols.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Sahib on April 08, 2010, 10:51:43 AM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 10:20:52 AM
Quote from: Malthus on April 08, 2010, 08:22:24 AM
I hear rants on this subject from my wife and her relations often enough. Any historical work or even novel that (somewhat anachronistically) refers to the Rus as "Russian" sends them into a fury.

The best part is, there is no other handy adjective in English that could substitute for "something or someone from Kievan Rus".

"Ruthenian"?

Quote from: Zanza on April 08, 2010, 10:37:06 AM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 10:33:17 AMGermans tend to give weird and totally unrelated names to places they occupy.
What would be a related name? What does Lviv (or whatever) mean?
City/Town of Leo IIRC
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Barrister on April 08, 2010, 11:00:26 AM
Quote from: Malthus on April 08, 2010, 08:22:24 AM
Quote from: Alatriste on April 08, 2010, 07:21:04 AM
Kievan Rus was not Russian. Any talk of a Ruthenian nation is ill-informed, stupid, possibly mad and the product of Muscovite attempts to split and destroy Ukraine.

I hear rants on this subject from my wife and her relations often enough. Any historical work or even novel that (somewhat anachronistically) refers to the Rus as "Russian" sends them into a fury.

Damn straight.  Your wife is very wise in such matters.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Syt on April 08, 2010, 11:04:28 AM
I know one person from Lviv and he calls it Lviv. I know more East Ukrainians, they call it Lvov.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: The Brain on April 08, 2010, 11:46:57 AM
Charles XII took Lemberg, not some faggity slave name town.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Alcibiades on April 08, 2010, 11:54:40 AM
Quote from: Neil on April 08, 2010, 08:11:57 AM
They should feel guilty for having failed.  More than anybody else, the Nazis are guilty for having subjected the world to Martinus.  Other than his parents, I suppose.

Still, a lot of problems would be solved if the old Hohenzollern, Habsburg and Ottoman empires were reconstructed.

Yeah no shit, the world would be a better place without Martinus.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Razgovory on April 08, 2010, 12:12:36 PM
Quote from: Alcibiades on April 08, 2010, 11:54:40 AM
Quote from: Neil on April 08, 2010, 08:11:57 AM
They should feel guilty for having failed.  More than anybody else, the Nazis are guilty for having subjected the world to Martinus.  Other than his parents, I suppose.

Still, a lot of problems would be solved if the old Hohenzollern, Habsburg and Ottoman empires were reconstructed.

Yeah no shit, the world would be a better place without Martinus.

Should have stayed communist.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 02:06:27 PM
Quote from: Sahib on April 08, 2010, 10:51:43 AM
"Ruthenian"?

Why the fuck should we use a Latin name for a place where Latin was never even used? Not to mention that "Russia" was used in Latin documents as well to denote Kievan Rus.

Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Lucidor on April 08, 2010, 02:43:34 PM
I love it! I'd follow the EUOT thread religiously! Is there a Balkan political discussion subforum yet, to get rid of the crazy of the regular OT?
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Agelastus on April 08, 2010, 03:53:15 PM
Quote from: Zanza on April 08, 2010, 10:34:03 AM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 10:22:16 AM
As for Gdansk/Danzig, eleven pages of archives (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gda%C5%84sk) (Lvov/Lviv has one). I rest my case.
Some tards fighting on Wikipedia is different from governments making policy based on names.

Without reading it, I assume some of them are the ones who say that Danzig was illegally occupied first by the Germans, and then by the Poles, and should be recognised as the Free City it was before WWII?
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: The Minsky Moment on April 08, 2010, 04:04:32 PM
Quote from: Alatriste on April 08, 2010, 07:21:04 AM
Ukraine/Poland Anyone who spells the capital of Galicia as Lwów is a Polish nationalist who bayonets Ukrainian babies for fun. Anyone who says it is spelled Lviv is a Ukrainian fascist who bayonets Polish babies for fun. Anyone who spells it Lvov is a Soviet mass murderer. And anyone who calls it Lemberg is a Nazi. See you in Leopolis for further discussion.

Heh - my grandfather was born there.
The key thing to remember is whatever the differences among these people and their spelling of place names, they can always be united under a common cause: kick the crap out of the Jews.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Malthus on April 08, 2010, 04:32:43 PM
Quote from: The Minsky Moment on April 08, 2010, 04:04:32 PM
Quote from: Alatriste on April 08, 2010, 07:21:04 AM
Ukraine/Poland Anyone who spells the capital of Galicia as Lwów is a Polish nationalist who bayonets Ukrainian babies for fun. Anyone who says it is spelled Lviv is a Ukrainian fascist who bayonets Polish babies for fun. Anyone who spells it Lvov is a Soviet mass murderer. And anyone who calls it Lemberg is a Nazi. See you in Leopolis for further discussion.

Heh - my grandfather was born there.
The key thing to remember is whatever the differences among these people and their spelling of place names, they can always be united under a common cause: kick the crap out of the Jews.

As was my maternal grandmother.

We may be related!  :D
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: The Larch on April 08, 2010, 04:37:56 PM
More importantly, how did they call the city?  :lol:
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: grumbler on April 08, 2010, 04:42:33 PM
Quote from: The Larch on April 08, 2010, 04:37:56 PM
More importantly, how did they call the city?  :lol:
L'Ouch: "City of Bruised Shins."
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Malthus on April 08, 2010, 04:55:42 PM
Quote from: The Larch on April 08, 2010, 04:37:56 PM
More importantly, how did they call the city?  :lol:

No doubt by whatever name got them beaten the least.  ;)
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: The Minsky Moment on April 08, 2010, 05:14:20 PM
Quote from: The Larch on April 08, 2010, 04:37:56 PM
More importantly, how did they call the city?  :lol:

I forget the Yiddish for: "What a dump; when can we get to America/Canada/Australia/Argentina/Palestine/Hell we'll even take the Dominican Republic"
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Razgovory on April 08, 2010, 05:30:28 PM
Quote from: Malthus on April 08, 2010, 04:32:43 PM
Quote from: The Minsky Moment on April 08, 2010, 04:04:32 PM
Quote from: Alatriste on April 08, 2010, 07:21:04 AM
Ukraine/Poland Anyone who spells the capital of Galicia as Lwów is a Polish nationalist who bayonets Ukrainian babies for fun. Anyone who says it is spelled Lviv is a Ukrainian fascist who bayonets Polish babies for fun. Anyone who spells it Lvov is a Soviet mass murderer. And anyone who calls it Lemberg is a Nazi. See you in Leopolis for further discussion.

Heh - my grandfather was born there.
The key thing to remember is whatever the differences among these people and their spelling of place names, they can always be united under a common cause: kick the crap out of the Jews.

As was my maternal grandmother.

We may be related!  :D

I think Guller is from there as well.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Razgovory on April 08, 2010, 05:31:45 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 02:06:27 PM
Quote from: Sahib on April 08, 2010, 10:51:43 AM
"Ruthenian"?

Why the fuck should we use a Latin name for a place where Latin was never even used? Not to mention that "Russia" was used in Latin documents as well to denote Kievan Rus.

Cause apparently the natives can't agree.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Barrister on April 08, 2010, 05:39:39 PM
Quote from: The Minsky Moment on April 08, 2010, 05:14:20 PM
Quote from: The Larch on April 08, 2010, 04:37:56 PM
More importantly, how did they call the city?  :lol:

I forget the Yiddish for: "What a dump; when can we get to America/Canada/Australia/Argentina/Palestine/Hell we'll even take the Dominican Republic"

I thought that as far as Ukrainian cities go, L'viv was quite nice?   :)
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Admiral Yi on April 08, 2010, 05:43:39 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 08, 2010, 05:39:39 PM
I thought that as far as Ukrainian cities go, L'viv was quite nice?   :)
It's a nice place to l'visit, but you wouldn't want to lviv there.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Barrister on April 08, 2010, 05:44:50 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on April 08, 2010, 05:43:39 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 08, 2010, 05:39:39 PM
I thought that as far as Ukrainian cities go, L'viv was quite nice?   :)
It's a nice place to l'visit, but you wouldn't want to lviv there.

:frusty:
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Jacob on April 08, 2010, 05:48:14 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on April 08, 2010, 05:43:39 PM
It's a nice place to l'visit, but you wouldn't want to lviv there.

:lol:
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Martinus on April 08, 2010, 05:50:42 PM
Sorry, but Jewish people are the last ones who should be mentoring others about silly territorial disputes based on obscure historical claims. :P
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Viking on April 08, 2010, 05:51:02 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 10:20:52 AM
The best part is, there is no other handy adjective in English that could substitute for "something or someone from Kievan Rus".

Steppetard and Stepptardite.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Martinus on April 08, 2010, 05:53:30 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 08, 2010, 05:39:39 PM
Quote from: The Minsky Moment on April 08, 2010, 05:14:20 PM
Quote from: The Larch on April 08, 2010, 04:37:56 PM
More importantly, how did they call the city?  :lol:

I forget the Yiddish for: "What a dump; when can we get to America/Canada/Australia/Argentina/Palestine/Hell we'll even take the Dominican Republic"

I thought that as far as Ukrainian cities go, L'viv was quite nice?   :)

It was Lwow before the war. :P

A sizable part of the population (majority?) was Polish.

Most of them were resettled to Wroclaw (formerly Breslau) after the war.

And you wonder why the region is so fucked up.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Martinus on April 08, 2010, 05:54:30 PM
Quote from: Viking on April 08, 2010, 05:51:02 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 10:20:52 AM
The best part is, there is no other handy adjective in English that could substitute for "something or someone from Kievan Rus".

Steppetard and Stepptardite.

Sorry, but Icelandtards have really no place laughing at other nations. :P
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Razgovory on April 08, 2010, 06:30:24 PM
Quote from: Martinus on April 08, 2010, 05:50:42 PM
Sorry, but Jewish people are the last ones who should be mentoring others about silly territorial disputes based on obscure historical claims. :P

Not so, they have the decency to win their fights.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Agelastus on April 08, 2010, 07:23:34 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on April 08, 2010, 06:30:24 PM
Quote from: Martinus on April 08, 2010, 05:50:42 PM
Sorry, but Jewish people are the last ones who should be mentoring others about silly territorial disputes based on obscure historical claims. :P

Not so, they have the decency to win their fights.

That's only recently though. The Jews have a long and honourable history of defeat in armed conflict going back to the Assyrians.
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Alatriste on April 09, 2010, 05:00:18 AM
Quote from: Razgovory on April 08, 2010, 10:09:16 AM
QuoteThe EU is a more hopeful source of help. It is good at solving problems by being boring. Faced with the prospect of a near-death experience in a meeting room in Brussels, people often discover new possibilities for compromise.

:lmfao:

I knew you Yanks (and Rebs too) would love this part... :D

"Talk, talk, talk is better than war, war, war" (Winston S. Churchill)
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Martinus on April 09, 2010, 05:09:03 AM
"Being Boring" :wub:
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Viking on April 09, 2010, 05:57:38 AM
Quote from: Martinus on April 08, 2010, 05:54:30 PM
Quote from: Viking on April 08, 2010, 05:51:02 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 10:20:52 AM
The best part is, there is no other handy adjective in English that could substitute for "something or someone from Kievan Rus".

Steppetard and Stepptardite.

Sorry, but Icelandtards have really no place laughing at other nations. :P

What, poland isn't a nation anymore?
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Neil on April 09, 2010, 06:10:24 AM
Quote from: Viking on April 09, 2010, 05:57:38 AM
Quote from: Martinus on April 08, 2010, 05:54:30 PM
Quote from: Viking on April 08, 2010, 05:51:02 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 10:20:52 AM
The best part is, there is no other handy adjective in English that could substitute for "something or someone from Kievan Rus".

Steppetard and Stepptardite.

Sorry, but Icelandtards have really no place laughing at other nations. :P

What, poland isn't a nation anymore?
Perhaps Marti considers them to be a tribe of Russians?
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: The Minsky Moment on April 09, 2010, 08:53:43 AM
Quote from: Martinus on April 08, 2010, 05:50:42 PM
Sorry, but Jewish people are the last ones who should be mentoring others about silly territorial disputes based on obscure historical claims. :P

When did that happen?
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Malthus on April 09, 2010, 09:16:59 AM
Quote from: Barrister on April 08, 2010, 05:39:39 PM
I thought that as far as Ukrainian cities go, L'viv was quite nice?   :)

Depends on how much of the historic ambiance of the place you can appreciate between beatings.  ;)
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: dps on April 09, 2010, 01:05:15 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 02:06:27 PM
Quote from: Sahib on April 08, 2010, 10:51:43 AM
"Ruthenian"?

Why the fuck should we use a Latin name for a place where Latin was never even used? Not to mention that "Russia" was used in Latin documents as well to denote Kievan Rus.

Well, in the West we still use Latin sometimes because we still have some degree of civilization.  That wouldn't apply in Eastern Europe, though, so I don't know why anyone would use it there.


Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Razgovory on April 09, 2010, 01:34:50 PM
Quote from: dps on April 09, 2010, 01:05:15 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 02:06:27 PM
Quote from: Sahib on April 08, 2010, 10:51:43 AM
"Ruthenian"?

Why the fuck should we use a Latin name for a place where Latin was never even used? Not to mention that "Russia" was used in Latin documents as well to denote Kievan Rus.

Well, in the West we still use Latin sometimes because we still have some degree of civilization.  That wouldn't apply in Eastern Europe, though, so I don't know why anyone would use it there.


Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: The Brain on April 09, 2010, 01:46:12 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on April 09, 2010, 01:34:50 PM
Quote from: dps on April 09, 2010, 01:05:15 PM
Quote from: Solmyr on April 08, 2010, 02:06:27 PM
Quote from: Sahib on April 08, 2010, 10:51:43 AM
"Ruthenian"?

Why the fuck should we use a Latin name for a place where Latin was never even used? Not to mention that "Russia" was used in Latin documents as well to denote Kievan Rus.

Well, in the West we still use Latin sometimes because we still have some degree of civilization.  That wouldn't apply in Eastern Europe, though, so I don't know why anyone would use it there.


Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: Malthus on April 09, 2010, 02:07:59 PM
I hereby propose that anyone who partakes in that silly 'quoting someone who screwed up the coding' meme have the word 'Retard" added to their title. 
Title: Re: Are you calling me a Tatar?
Post by: The Brain on April 09, 2010, 02:09:37 PM
Quote from: Malthus on April 09, 2010, 02:07:59 PM
Fuck you.

I hereby propose that anyone who partakes in that silly 'quoting someone who screwed up the coding' meme have the word 'Retard" added to their title.