Polish archbishop made headlines by saying during a homily that the fault of the pedophilia scandal in the US lies not in catholic priests, but in the fall of morals of the American society.
He then went on to make a statistical fail of Biblical proportions by stating that catholic priests are responsible for "only" 2% of pedophilia scandals in the US (someone helpfully pointed out that catholic priests make up about 0.15% of US population, which, for those mathematically challenged, means a catholic priest is about 14 times more likely to molest a kid than an average American).
I love Polish catholicism. It makes me warm inside. :pope:
Awww, that's cute. I'm sure that guy is a pedophile himself, just like Benedict is. :)
Why do they call it pedophile, when it is homosexual rape?
Those faggots not only like kids, but MALE kids.
I doesn't get any more gay than that.
Quote from: Siege on April 02, 2010, 06:55:39 AM
Why do they call it pedophile, when it is homosexual rape?
:huh:
Pedophilia is a sexual preference for children. Rape is a behavior. Two different things, chief. I suppose it is possible to be a pedophile but never actually engage in rape... no idea how often that happens or if there's any possible way to measure for that.
Quote from: Caliga on April 02, 2010, 07:19:50 AM
Pedophilia is a sexual preference for children. Rape is a behavior. Two different things, chief. I suppose it is possible to be a pedophile but never actually engage in rape... no idea how often that happens or if there's any possible way to measure for that.
Beeb mentioned one time that they have some gizmo that slips on your dick and measures how much of a chubby you sprout when they show you pictures of little boy and/or girls.
Quote from: Admiral Yi on April 02, 2010, 09:38:01 AM
Quote from: Caliga on April 02, 2010, 07:19:50 AM
Pedophilia is a sexual preference for children. Rape is a behavior. Two different things, chief. I suppose it is possible to be a pedophile but never actually engage in rape... no idea how often that happens or if there's any possible way to measure for that.
Beeb mentioned one time that they have some gizmo that slips on your dick and measures how much of a chubby you sprout when they show you pictures of little boy and/or girls.
You try it out?
Quote from: Razgovory on April 02, 2010, 10:04:48 AM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on April 02, 2010, 09:38:01 AM
Quote from: Caliga on April 02, 2010, 07:19:50 AM
Pedophilia is a sexual preference for children. Rape is a behavior. Two different things, chief. I suppose it is possible to be a pedophile but never actually engage in rape... no idea how often that happens or if there's any possible way to measure for that.
Beeb mentioned one time that they have some gizmo that slips on your dick and measures how much of a chubby you sprout when they show you pictures of little boy and/or girls.
You try it out?
No he didn't, the gizmo was too big.
On the other hand, homosexuals are far more likely to molest children, so let's kill them.
I hate children...why would I want to touch them? :x
Quote from: garbon on April 02, 2010, 11:07:27 AM
I hate children...why would I want to touch them? :x
You hate other men, but you touch them as well.
Quote from: Neil on April 02, 2010, 11:29:27 AM
You hate other men, but you touch them as well.
I do?
Quote from: Martinus on April 02, 2010, 04:05:45 AM
I love Polish catholicism. It makes me warm inside. :pope:
I don't think anyone here needs to know what makes you warm inside. :x
garbon offered me a handjob if I drove up to SF. :x :yuk:
Quote from: Admiral Yi on April 02, 2010, 09:38:01 AM
Quote from: Caliga on April 02, 2010, 07:19:50 AM
Pedophilia is a sexual preference for children. Rape is a behavior. Two different things, chief. I suppose it is possible to be a pedophile but never actually engage in rape... no idea how often that happens or if there's any possible way to measure for that.
Beeb mentioned one time that they have some gizmo that slips on your dick and measures how much of a chubby you sprout when they show you pictures of little boy and/or girls.
Penile Plethysmograph
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penile_plethysmograph
Apparently there are a number of people who are quite attracted to children, but who do not actually molest them (since they know how very, very bad things will happen to them if they do). Or, many rely solely on child porn.
Quote from: Barrister on April 02, 2010, 01:37:40 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on April 02, 2010, 09:38:01 AM
Quote from: Caliga on April 02, 2010, 07:19:50 AM
Pedophilia is a sexual preference for children. Rape is a behavior. Two different things, chief. I suppose it is possible to be a pedophile but never actually engage in rape... no idea how often that happens or if there's any possible way to measure for that.
Beeb mentioned one time that they have some gizmo that slips on your dick and measures how much of a chubby you sprout when they show you pictures of little boy and/or girls.
Penile Plethysmograph
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penile_plethysmograph
Apparently there are a number of people who are quite attracted to children, but who do not actually molest them (since they know how very, very bad things will happen to them if they do). Or, many rely solely on child porn.
This is some serious Big Brother bullshit man. Fuck that.
So if Martinus meets a handsome 15year old boy, he wouldn't touch him sexually for three years?
I don't buy it...
Quote from: Barrister on April 02, 2010, 01:37:40 PM
Apparently there are a number of people who are quite attracted to children, but who do not actually molest them (since they know how very, very bad things will happen to them if they do). Or, many rely solely on child porn.
You make it sound like it was something surprising. There are many men who do that (i.e. rely solely on porn) and their sexual attraction does not involve illegal acts. :lol:
On a more serious note, this is an interesting point in a debate whether "virtual" child pornography should be allowed or not. The common position of the proponents of the ban is that it encourages pedophiles to seek contact with actual children - but your post would suggest the opposite.
Quote from: Alexandru H. on April 02, 2010, 03:07:20 PM
So if Martinus meets a handsome 15year old boy, he wouldn't touch him sexually for three years?
I don't buy it...
Err. The age of consent in Poland is 15. :huh:
Quote from: Martinus on April 02, 2010, 03:17:42 PM
Quote from: Alexandru H. on April 02, 2010, 03:07:20 PM
So if Martinus meets a handsome 15year old boy, he wouldn't touch him sexually for three years?
I don't buy it...
Err. The age of consent in Poland is 15. :huh:
Legal pedophilia? Good for you, Mr. Gay Lobby.
Quote from: Martinus on April 02, 2010, 03:17:42 PM
Quote from: Alexandru H. on April 02, 2010, 03:07:20 PM
So if Martinus meets a handsome 15year old boy, he wouldn't touch him sexually for three years?
I don't buy it...
Err. The age of consent in Poland is 15. :huh:
Yeah, should have used a lower figure.
But I accept defeat and I'm exiting shamefully from this thread... :cry:
Quote from: Martinus on April 02, 2010, 03:16:26 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 02, 2010, 01:37:40 PM
Apparently there are a number of people who are quite attracted to children, but who do not actually molest them (since they know how very, very bad things will happen to them if they do). Or, many rely solely on child porn.
You make it sound like it was something surprising. There are many men who do that (i.e. rely solely on porn) and their sexual attraction does not involve illegal acts. :lol:
On a more serious note, this is an interesting point in a debate whether "virtual" child pornography should be allowed or not. The common position of the proponents of the ban is that it encourages pedophiles to seek contact with actual children - but your post would suggest the opposite.
FWIW my experience is that I have sought out American high school dropouts with tats and a history of abuse living in California. I think porn has nothing to do with this.
Quote from: Alexandru H. on April 02, 2010, 03:31:36 PM
Yeah, should have used a lower figure.
But I accept defeat and I'm exiting shamefully from this thread... :cry:
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fnewsimg.ngfiles.com%2F117000%2F117416_76837_Unsuccessful.jpg&hash=c316801c2445b3bbabec5030b2c8d936ead586f7)
:(
Quote from: Martinus on April 02, 2010, 03:16:26 PM
Quote from: Barrister on April 02, 2010, 01:37:40 PM
Apparently there are a number of people who are quite attracted to children, but who do not actually molest them (since they know how very, very bad things will happen to them if they do). Or, many rely solely on child porn.
You make it sound like it was something surprising. There are many men who do that (i.e. rely solely on porn) and their sexual attraction does not involve illegal acts. :lol:
On a more serious note, this is an interesting point in a debate whether "virtual" child pornography should be allowed or not. The common position of the proponents of the ban is that it encourages pedophiles to seek contact with actual children - but your post would suggest the opposite.
I don't think my post suggests one way or another. I didn't mention the topic.
What do you mean by "virtual" child pornography? Something like fiction, or drawn images, where no real child was involved in the creation?
Hentai, CGI some sort of fucked up video game; there are all sorts of potential '"virtual" child pornography'.
Quote from: Sahib on April 02, 2010, 08:21:17 PM
Quote from: Alexandru H. on April 02, 2010, 03:31:36 PM
Yeah, should have used a lower figure.
But I accept defeat and I'm exiting shamefully from this thread... :cry:
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fnewsimg.ngfiles.com%2F117000%2F117416_76837_Unsuccessful.jpg&hash=c316801c2445b3bbabec5030b2c8d936ead586f7)
:(
I don't know why but this picture made me laugh out loud. :D
Quote from: Barrister on April 02, 2010, 09:43:41 PMI don't think my post suggests one way or another. I didn't mention the topic.
What do you mean by "virtual" child pornography? Something like fiction, or drawn images, where no real child was involved in the creation?
Or animation of any kind.
Quote from: Jaron on April 02, 2010, 12:58:59 PM
garbon offered me a handjob if I drove up to SF. :x :yuk:
Puh-leeze.
Quote from: Martinus on April 02, 2010, 04:05:45 AM
catholic priests make up about 0.15% of US population,
Ah? :huh: