Stop the presses!
QuoteMark McGwire has admitted taking steroids in 1998 when he broke Roger Maris' home run record.
"I wish I had never touched steroids," McGwire said in a statement. "It was foolish and it was a mistake. I truly apologize. Looking back, I wish I had never played during the steroid era.
"I'm sure people will wonder if I could have hit all those home runs had I never taken steroids. I had good years when I didn't take any and I had bad years when I didn't take any. I had good years when I took steroids and I had bad years when I took steroids. But no matter what, I shouldn't have done it and for that I'm truly sorry. Baseball is really different now -- it's been cleaned up. The Commissioner and the Players Association implemented testing and they cracked down, and I'm glad they did."
McGwire is entering his first season as the hitting coach of the St. Louis Cardinals, and his return to baseball prompted his admission. "It's time for me to talk about the past and to confirm what people have suspected," McGwire said. That echoes the phrase he used repeatedly during a Congressional inquiry into steroids in baseball in 2005, when he stonewalled questions about whether he had ever used steroids by saying, "I'm not here to talk about the past."
McGwire then went into seclusion for several years before being hired at the end of last season as the Cardinals' new hitting coach.
"I'm glad Mark has gone public and the Cardinals welcome him back as our hitting coach," said Bill DeWitt Jr., the chairman of the St. Louis Cardinals.
McGwire played 16 seasons in the majors with Oakland and St. Louis. He retired after the 2001 season having hit 583 home runs, which still ranks tied for eighth in major league history. His 10.61 at bats/home run is the best ever.
Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/baseball/mlb/01/11/mcgwire.steroids/index.html?cnn=yes#ixzz0cL9zqNFe
Get a free NFL Team Jacket and Tee with SI Subscription
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/baseball/mlb/01/11/mcgwire.steroids/index.html?cnn=yes
Also Pete Rose is a known gambler.
That ruins my concept of good and evil. :(
You still aren't getting into the Hall of Fame Mark.
Wow! Did anyone suspect this?
I'll say it - it's nice to see him come clean.
Didn't he fess up a long time ago?
Quote from: Admiral Yi on January 11, 2010, 05:44:08 PM
Didn't he fess up a long time ago?
Nope.
He would give a non-answer, such as "I'm not here to talk about the past". By not denying it it could be presumed, but this is the first time he made a positive statement that he used steroids.
Quote from: Barrister on January 11, 2010, 05:18:23 PM
I'll say it - it's nice to see him come clean.
He won't come clean till he admits to all those arsons and killing of prostitutes.
Quote from: Razgovory on January 11, 2010, 06:12:12 PM
Quote from: Barrister on January 11, 2010, 05:18:23 PM
I'll say it - it's nice to see him come clean.
He won't come clean till he admits to all those arsons and killing of prostitutes.
Is that a Raz original theory, or has it been postulated elsewhere?
Quote from: Razgovory on January 11, 2010, 06:12:12 PM
Quote from: Barrister on January 11, 2010, 05:18:23 PM
I'll say it - it's nice to see him come clean.
He won't come clean till he admits to all those arsons and killing of prostitutes.
Not a fan I take it.
It's well know around St. Louis.
Quote from: Valmy on January 11, 2010, 04:41:24 PM
You still aren't getting into the Hall of Fame Mark.
Yeah, he ruined his chances by waiting this long, though they probably would've still been pretty slim anyways even if he'd fessed up at the congressional hearing.
Quote from: Valmy on January 11, 2010, 04:41:24 PM
You still aren't getting into the Hall of Fame Mark.
He is going to make it. Eventually they are going to let in Bonds, Clemens, Sosa, or Rodriguez--I can't imagine none of those guys getting in. At that point, what rationale is there to keep him out? At worst he goes to the veteran's committee before getting in.
Quote from: alfred russel on January 11, 2010, 06:52:35 PM
Quote from: Valmy on January 11, 2010, 04:41:24 PM
You still aren't getting into the Hall of Fame Mark.
He is going to make it. Eventually they are going to let in Bonds, Clemens, Sosa, or Rodriguez--I can't imagine none of those guys getting in. At that point, what rationale is there to keep him out? At worst he goes to the veteran's committee before getting in.
If the writers don't vote him in, as it stands now he can't get in. The VC is currently limited to considering only players from before 1943.
Of course, that'll change regardless of Big Mac's status. They've changed the rules the VC operates under more often than some Languishites probably change their underwear.
Quote from: dps on January 11, 2010, 07:07:03 PM
If the writers don't vote him in, as it stands now he can't get in. The VC is currently limited to considering only players from before 1943.
Of course, that'll change regardless of Big Mac's status. They've changed the rules the VC operates under more often than some Languishites probably change their underwear.
Are you sure? That doesn't seem right.
It doesn't matter who does it, eventually he will get in.
Well, stop the fucking presses.
Quote from: alfred russel on January 11, 2010, 07:13:26 PM
Quote from: dps on January 11, 2010, 07:07:03 PM
If the writers don't vote him in, as it stands now he can't get in. The VC is currently limited to considering only players from before 1943.
Of course, that'll change regardless of Big Mac's status. They've changed the rules the VC operates under more often than some Languishites probably change their underwear.
Are you sure? That doesn't seem right.
It doesn't matter who does it, eventually he will get in.
Well, if could be a bit off--I don't have exact data on frequency of underwear change for all posters here.
Seriously, I'm not entirely sure exactly what the rules are now. They really do change them so often that it can be hard to keep up, especially since some of the changes have been pretty arcane and have been buried in press releases that dealt mostly with other Hall of Fame-related matters.
The problem with Cooperstown is too many George F. Will bowtie poindexters have the vote.
If Charlie Hustle isn't allowed in, neither should the Human Growth Hormone League.
Least surprising surprise ever. :yawn:
I think this helps his HoF chances enough that he will make it at some point in the next 3-7 years.
Quote from: sbr on January 11, 2010, 11:57:37 PM
Least surprising surprise ever. :yawn:
I think this helps his HoF chances enough that he will make it at some point in the next 3-7 years.
I disagree, he's barely cracked 20% up to this point.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/story?columnist=bryant_howard&id=4817361
Quote
His admission does not increase his worthiness for the Hall of Fame; indeed it should weaken his already faint chances at enshrinement because he is, in totality, a steroid creation unable to use the Bonds/Clemens "He was a Hall of Famer before he used" argument -- but McGwire gained respect as a man. Like Pete Rose, whose ultimate gambling admission game to sell a book and apply for reinstatement to the game, McGwire likely will be criticized for coming clean because he had something to gain -- a job in the game from which he had suffered a serious exile -- but his admission does have value.
Quote from: Barrister on January 11, 2010, 05:18:23 PM
I'll say it - it's nice to see him come clean.
Except he is only doing it to get the job he wants as St. Louis hitting coach. The dude is a liar and scumbag to the end.
Quote from: alfred russel on January 11, 2010, 06:52:35 PM
Quote from: Valmy on January 11, 2010, 04:41:24 PM
You still aren't getting into the Hall of Fame Mark.
He is going to make it. Eventually they are going to let in Bonds, Clemens, Sosa, or Rodriguez--I can't imagine none of those guys getting in. At that point, what rationale is there to keep him out? At worst he goes to the veteran's committee before getting in.
They cheated and don't deserve it? And seriously putting a worthless hack like Sosa in there with Clemens, Bonds, and Rodriguez?
McGwire had one good season he spent virtually the entire rest of his career with partial seasons due to injury. Even if he did not take steroids I have a hard time seeing him making it. Roger Maris isn't in for his one season and it was an actual clean season. Why the fuck should McGwire make it for having one season where he cheated his ass off? Where is the sense in that? Being in the Baseball Hall of Fame requires consistent excellence, not having one good season where you break a record through chemistry. Heck having one good season where you broke a record without cheating is not good enough.
Quote from: Valmy on January 12, 2010, 09:02:09 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 11, 2010, 06:52:35 PM
Quote from: Valmy on January 11, 2010, 04:41:24 PM
You still aren't getting into the Hall of Fame Mark.
He is going to make it. Eventually they are going to let in Bonds, Clemens, Sosa, or Rodriguez--I can't imagine none of those guys getting in. At that point, what rationale is there to keep him out? At worst he goes to the veteran's committee before getting in.
They cheated and don't deserve it? And seriously putting a worthless hack like Sosa in there with Clemens, Bonds, and Rodriguez?
McGwire had one good season he spent virtually the entire rest of his career with partial seasons due to injury. Even if he did not take steroids I have a hard time seeing him making it. Roger Maris isn't in for his one season and it was an actual clean season. Why the fuck should McGwire make it for having one season where he cheated his ass off? Where is the sense in that? Being in the Baseball Hall of Fame requires consistent excellence, not having one good season where you break a record through chemistry. Heck having one good season where you broke a record without cheating is not good enough.
McGwire had 5 great seasons, though it seems clear he cheated through all of them. I don't think he deserves to be in the hall either. He's nowhere near the caliber of Bonds, Clemens or A-Rod.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/m/mcgwima01.shtml?redir
Quote from: jimmy olsen on January 12, 2010, 09:16:46 AM
I don't think he deserves to be in the hall either. He's nowhere near the caliber of Bonds, Clemens or A-Rod.
Those three guys would be in the Hall of Fame anyway if they had never taken Steroids. As it is I think Rodriguez will get in anyway. Not sure about Bonds or Clemens, I think they will go the way of Shoeless Joe and Pete Rose but we will see.
He is in the top 10 in all time homeruns. Everyone in the top 25 is either in the hall of fame, still active, or recently retired.
Bonds, Clemens, and A-Rod are unfair comparisons because they were clear first ballot hall of famers (before the steroid issues).
Quote from: CountDeMoney on January 11, 2010, 07:22:44 PM
The problem with Cooperstown is too many George F. Will bowtie poindexters have the vote.
If Charlie Hustle isn't allowed in, neither should the Human Growth Hormone League.
Agree on both counts, surprisingly.
Quote from: alfred russel on January 12, 2010, 10:18:24 AM
He is in the top 10 in all time homeruns. Everyone in the top 25 is either in the hall of fame, still active, or recently retired.
Shoeless Joe had a .355 lifetime batting average. Granted, his offense was both greater and less common.
But yeah, if you just go by the stats, McGwire easily deserves to be in the HOF.
They had Bobby Knight on ESPN to comment on this. :lol:
"Who decides what performance enhancing things go onto the list, anyways? Gatorade is performance enhancing. ... If it's against the rules then I'm the first who says he shouldn't do it, though. I think he had bad advice coming with the statement as he did."
It's up to the league to decide their direction. If the league wants to allow this, since it draws fans or what ever, then that's their call. And apparently that's what direction the league is taking. If not, then the league should take serious action when it finds out.
I'm pretty disgusted with these juiced up guys breaking records. I say when they're found out, take serious action. Remove their records, partially at least. They shouldn't be allowed to hold top records. Yes, other guys juiced up will still do it, and if found take them to task as well, including some sort of downgrading of their records. That will eventually tell the players who might think of juicing up not to do it else they will face consequences. Otherwise, the league can continue on, nothing to see here, just watch the pretty baseball sail over the fence....
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on January 12, 2010, 11:27:50 AM
Quote from: alfred russel on January 12, 2010, 10:18:24 AM
He is in the top 10 in all time homeruns. Everyone in the top 25 is either in the hall of fame, still active, or recently retired.
Shoeless Joe had a .355 lifetime batting average. Granted, his offense was both greater and less common.
But yeah, if you just go by the stats, McGwire easily deserves to be in the HOF.
But Shoeless Joe, like Pete Rose, is ineligible. I can see reasons MLB might want to consider the two situations similar, but if MLB wants similar punishment then all of our roiders are going to be kicked out of baseball permanently on the first offense. Which isn't going to happen.
Quote from: KRonn on January 12, 2010, 11:38:51 AM
It's up to the league to decide their direction. If the league wants to allow this, since it draws fans or what ever, then that's their call. And apparently that's what direction the league is taking. If not, then the league should take serious action when it finds out.
I'm pretty disgusted with these juiced up guys breaking records. I say when they're found out, take serious action. Remove their records, partially at least. They shouldn't be allowed to hold top records. Yes, other guys juiced up will still do it, and if found take them to task as well, including some sort of downgrading of their records. That will eventually tell the players who might think of juicing up not to do it else they will face consequences. Otherwise, the league can continue on, nothing to see here, just watch the pretty baseball sail over the fence....
I agree with the sentiment. Unfortunately, it appears people want to see (home) runs, not pitchers tossing strikes and fly outs. In just about any sport people want to see high scores, not brilliant defense which kind of cheapens most games and teams by making them onesided if they want to please their fans.