Languish.org

General Category => Off the Record => Topic started by: Siege on September 03, 2009, 10:28:55 PM

Title: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Siege on September 03, 2009, 10:28:55 PM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Femailimages2.progressive.com%2FImages%2F4.0%2Fimages%2Fflo_waving.jpg&hash=8e111a967e6f43dfb19d146280d91ba8d550262f)

Is she hot or what?
She is in every friggin progressive commercial.
She ain't pretty, she ain;t even hot.
I would have never looked at her a second time.
So, what gives?
What makes her call my attention?
As hard as it is for a woman to command my attention...

Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Grey Fox on September 03, 2009, 10:30:12 PM
Girl next door thing.

You are way too dense to understand that.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Razgovory on September 03, 2009, 10:33:09 PM
I think she's hot.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: derspiess on September 03, 2009, 10:55:54 PM
It makes no sense, but yeah I find her strangely attractive.

http://www.austin360.com/tv/content/tv/stories/2008/10/1020progressive.html
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: DontSayBanana on September 03, 2009, 11:32:08 PM
Quote from: derspiess on September 03, 2009, 10:55:54 PM
It makes no sense, but yeah I find her strangely attractive.

http://www.austin360.com/tv/content/tv/stories/2008/10/1020progressive.html

QuoteSo pine away, in the same brunette-crush way you did with Mary Ann on "Gilligan's Island" and Velma on "Scooby-Doo."

They broke the article. :(

But yeah. The girl-next-door vibe is strong with her; maybe we're just naturally good at seeing through makeup- the actress is actually pretty good-looking.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: derspiess on September 03, 2009, 11:35:44 PM
Quote from: DontSayBanana on September 03, 2009, 11:32:08 PM
Quote from: derspiess on September 03, 2009, 10:55:54 PM
It makes no sense, but yeah I find her strangely attractive.

http://www.austin360.com/tv/content/tv/stories/2008/10/1020progressive.html

QuoteSo pine away, in the same brunette-crush way you did with Mary Ann on "Gilligan's Island" and Velma on "Scooby-Doo."

They broke the article. :(

Okay I missed that part.  Who the bloody hell thinks Velma is in any way hot?  I'm pretty sure she's a dude anyway.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Siege on September 03, 2009, 11:52:12 PM
What?

No fuckin way she is martinus!

Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: DisturbedPervert on September 04, 2009, 12:11:18 AM
The Mary Ann analogy is ridiculous.  Mary Ann had a smoking hot body and showed it off in very skimpy clothing.  Mary Ann seems like a girl next door type cause Ginger acted like a slut.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Siege on September 04, 2009, 12:18:44 AM
Who's that Mary Ann chick?

This thread is worthless without pictures.

Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Korea on September 04, 2009, 12:20:40 AM
I think she's cute but my friend Pimpicus thinks she is smokin. I think he wants to bang her.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Siege on September 04, 2009, 12:22:28 AM
She is as cool as the safety dance.
Cool, but I wouldn't try to...you know what.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcOZ6xFxJqg

Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Tonitrus on September 04, 2009, 12:23:27 AM
Quote from: Siege on September 04, 2009, 12:18:44 AM
Who's that Mary Ann chick?

This thread is worthless without pictures.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageport.files.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F03%2Fmary-anne.jpg&hash=30cd0b8ff6324cfc096384a0aa4052b4b1890fef)
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Siege on September 04, 2009, 12:26:02 AM
What was that Toni?

Legs?

Since when legs are cool for the sake of legs?

Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Tonitrus on September 04, 2009, 12:27:01 AM
Quote from: Siege on September 04, 2009, 12:26:02 AM
What was that Toni?

Legs?

Since when legs are cool for the sake of legs?


:unsure:

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ultrapdx.com%2Fzero%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2008%2F02%2Fzztop-legs.jpg&hash=ef51e90ae6776fb76581832c124616ca7dfaa126)
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Siege on September 04, 2009, 12:32:09 AM
Ok, those legs are cool because of the ZZ Top endorsment.
Ohther than that, and those legs would be just one of the mill.
My wife have waaaayyy better legs than those.

Even though she have some veins that I hear western chicks fear.

I don't care about that.

Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: DisturbedPervert on September 04, 2009, 12:33:27 AM
Quote from: Siege on September 04, 2009, 12:26:02 AM
Since when legs are cool for the sake of legs?

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flicklives.com%2FGlossary%2Fleg_lamp%2Fmajor_award_4.jpg&hash=a20d12f62abe58b8172767c32243c5ec25bf3752)
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Korea on September 04, 2009, 12:40:25 AM
True dat.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Siege on September 04, 2009, 12:55:01 AM
True what?

Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Korea on September 04, 2009, 12:57:48 AM
I was using slang. Dat = that
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Siege on September 04, 2009, 12:59:23 AM
Still, true what?

(damn, I had to type that 20 times, not kidding, I am that cool)

Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Eddie Teach on September 04, 2009, 03:57:31 AM
Siege doesn't care for sex leg?
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: KRonn on September 04, 2009, 08:39:19 AM
The Progressive woman isn't hot/attractive so much as she's good at being the geeky but bubbly and lively spokesperson. Something like that I'd say is what gets our attention.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: DontSayBanana on September 04, 2009, 08:44:55 AM
Quote from: KRonn on September 04, 2009, 08:39:19 AM
The Progressive woman isn't hot/attractive so much as she's good at being the geeky but bubbly and lively spokesperson. Something like that I'd say is what gets our attention.

:blush: Personally, I go for the nerdy chicks.

...But not Velma. No way in hell. Legs like a linebacker and shoulders to match. :x
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: lustindarkness on September 04, 2009, 10:25:10 AM
Quote from: derspiess on September 03, 2009, 11:35:44 PM
Quote from: DontSayBanana on September 03, 2009, 11:32:08 PM
Quote from: derspiess on September 03, 2009, 10:55:54 PM
It makes no sense, but yeah I find her strangely attractive.

http://www.austin360.com/tv/content/tv/stories/2008/10/1020progressive.html

QuoteSo pine away, in the same brunette-crush way you did with Mary Ann on "Gilligan's Island" and Velma on "Scooby-Doo."

They broke the article. :(

Okay I missed that part.  Who the bloody hell thinks Velma is in any way hot?  I'm pretty sure she's a dude anyway.

:blush:
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Barrister on September 04, 2009, 10:59:00 AM
Quote from: DontSayBanana on September 04, 2009, 08:44:55 AM
Quote from: KRonn on September 04, 2009, 08:39:19 AM
The Progressive woman isn't hot/attractive so much as she's good at being the geeky but bubbly and lively spokesperson. Something like that I'd say is what gets our attention.

:blush: Personally, I go for the nerdy chicks.

...But not Velma. No way in hell. Legs like a linebacker and shoulders to match. :x

I'd go for Velma. :blush:
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Strix on September 04, 2009, 11:05:10 AM
She is definitely not HOTT!

She reminds me of that character in the Drew Carey Show called Mimi (Kathy Kinney).

Americans sometimes confuse beauty with oddity. A person or thing can be so ugly that they stand out and because they stand out people find that attractive e.g. Shar Pei Dogs.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Octavian on September 04, 2009, 11:12:20 AM
Quote from: Siege on September 03, 2009, 10:28:55 PM
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Femailimages2.progressive.com%2FImages%2F4.0%2Fimages%2Fflo_waving.jpg&hash=8e111a967e6f43dfb19d146280d91ba8d550262f)
What makes her call my attention?

She look arabic somewhat and therefor familiar to you?
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: DisturbedPervert on September 04, 2009, 11:13:35 AM
Quote from: Strix on September 04, 2009, 11:05:10 AM
She reminds me of that character in the Drew Carey Show called Mimi (Kathy Kinney).

She reminds you of this?

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F_f0bvyZMrZ9k%2FSmfsnEhL3MI%2FAAAAAAAACA8%2FfIRiHte4Q1g%2Fs400%2Fkathykinney%2BMimi.jpg&hash=57c09f08b7217e77247e934fb2ebac1369a5de21)
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Strix on September 04, 2009, 11:15:30 AM
Quote from: DisturbedPervert on September 04, 2009, 11:13:35 AM
Quote from: Strix on September 04, 2009, 11:05:10 AM
She reminds me of that character in the Drew Carey Show called Mimi (Kathy Kinney).

She reminds you of this?

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F_f0bvyZMrZ9k%2FSmfsnEhL3MI%2FAAAAAAAACA8%2FfIRiHte4Q1g%2Fs400%2Fkathykinney%2BMimi.jpg&hash=57c09f08b7217e77247e934fb2ebac1369a5de21)

An older version but yes. They have the same smile, mannerisms, make-up, and other stuff.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: jimmy olsen on September 04, 2009, 11:17:28 AM
You're crazy.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Kleves on September 04, 2009, 11:20:38 AM
Not hot.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Eddie Teach on September 04, 2009, 11:48:43 AM
Quote from: Strix on September 04, 2009, 11:15:30 AM
An older version but yes. They have the same smile, mannerisms, make-up, and other stuff.

You do realize that one is morbidly obese and the other is fairly slender, yes?
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Berkut on September 04, 2009, 11:50:59 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on September 04, 2009, 11:48:43 AM
Quote from: Strix on September 04, 2009, 11:15:30 AM
An older version but yes. They have the same smile, mannerisms, make-up, and other stuff.

You do realize that one is morbidly obese and the other is fairly slender, yes?

More to the point - one was selected and then made up to be about as grotesque as absolutely possible, and the other was not.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Eddie Teach on September 04, 2009, 11:58:51 AM
Quote from: Berkut on September 04, 2009, 11:50:59 AM
More to the point - one was selected and then made up to be about as grotesque as absolutely possible, and the other was not.

Yeah. Progressive chick does wear a tad too much makeup but that comparison is rather bizarre.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: MadImmortalMan on September 04, 2009, 12:50:20 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on September 04, 2009, 11:58:51 AM
Quote from: Berkut on September 04, 2009, 11:50:59 AM
More to the point - one was selected and then made up to be about as grotesque as absolutely possible, and the other was not.

Yeah. Progressive chick does wear a tad too much makeup but that comparison is rather bizarre.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F_MjdtULzbIHQ%2FSaycjt3ja5I%2FAAAAAAAACWk%2FIqyJ4CkJen8%2Fs400%2FBozo%2Bthe%2BClown.jpg&hash=44f34c1593d369bd27525372eb0e318e14457c07)
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Korea on September 04, 2009, 01:07:07 PM
Quote from: Siege on September 04, 2009, 12:59:23 AM
Still, true what?

(damn, I had to type that 20 times, not kidding, I am that cool)

::frusty::frusty::frusty::frusty:

I was referring to DPs picture reference.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Strix on September 04, 2009, 01:14:00 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on September 04, 2009, 11:48:43 AM
Quote from: Strix on September 04, 2009, 11:15:30 AM
An older version but yes. They have the same smile, mannerisms, make-up, and other stuff.

You do realize that one is morbidly obese and the other is fairly slender, yes?

Yes, and one is young and the other old. I didn't say they were identical twins, did I? I said the Progressive character reminded me of the Drew Carey character.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Eddie Teach on September 04, 2009, 01:32:33 PM
Quote from: Strix on September 04, 2009, 01:14:00 PM
Yes, and one is young and the other old. I didn't say they were identical twins, did I? I said the Progressive character reminded me of the Drew Carey character.

Malthus reminds me of Sammy Davis Jr. They're both Jewish!
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Ideologue on September 04, 2009, 02:26:19 PM
I'd hit it.  She's about a 7.5.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Strix on September 04, 2009, 02:36:09 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on September 04, 2009, 01:32:33 PM
Quote from: Strix on September 04, 2009, 01:14:00 PM
Yes, and one is young and the other old. I didn't say they were identical twins, did I? I said the Progressive character reminded me of the Drew Carey character.

Malthus reminds me of Sammy Davis Jr. They're both Jewish!

But do they both have a glass eye?
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Maximus on September 04, 2009, 02:39:52 PM
Quote from: DontSayBanana on September 04, 2009, 08:44:55 AM
:blush: Personally, I go for the nerdy chicks.

Nerd chicks can be HOTT. I personally think it's because they're more about what they can do than what they look like.

Verbal diarrhea chick is NOTT HOTT.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: derspiess on September 04, 2009, 02:50:48 PM
Quote from: DisturbedPervert on September 04, 2009, 12:11:18 AM
The Mary Ann analogy is ridiculous.  Mary Ann had a smoking hot body and showed it off in very skimpy clothing.  Mary Ann seems like a girl next door type cause Ginger acted like a slut.

Saw one episode a while back where Mary Ann was showing some flabby thighs.  They were probably normal for the time, but still unappealing.  That pushed me back over into the Ginger camp.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Valmy on September 04, 2009, 02:53:21 PM
Quote from: Maximus on September 04, 2009, 02:39:52 PM
Nerd chicks can be HOTT. I personally think it's because they're more about what they can do than what they look like.

Why would that only apply to nerdy chicks?  I like artsy chicks.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Maximus on September 04, 2009, 03:07:21 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 04, 2009, 02:53:21 PM
Why would that only apply to nerdy chicks?  I like artsy chicks.
Applies to them too.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: derspiess on September 04, 2009, 03:59:02 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 04, 2009, 02:53:21 PM
Why would that only apply to nerdy chicks?  I like artsy chicks.

Nerdy chicks can be great in small doses.  Most artsy chicks = no thanx.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Malthus on September 04, 2009, 04:01:25 PM
Quote from: derspiess on September 04, 2009, 03:59:02 PM
Quote from: Valmy on September 04, 2009, 02:53:21 PM
Why would that only apply to nerdy chicks?  I like artsy chicks.

Nerdy chicks can be great in small doses.  Most artsy chicks = no thanx.

I like both.

Even, in fantasy at least, at the same time.  :D

Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Admiral Yi on September 04, 2009, 05:31:36 PM
She's an uglier version of that SNL chick who smelled her armpits.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: dps on September 04, 2009, 07:38:10 PM
Quote from: Siege on September 04, 2009, 12:59:23 AM
Still, true what?

(damn, I had to type that 20 times, not kidding, I am that retardedl)



Fixed
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Sophie Scholl on September 04, 2009, 10:02:55 PM
She's attractive without the makeup.  The bright, bright red lipstick contrasted with the pale skin and whiteness of the room makes her stick out and really focus on her face I think.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: DisturbedPervert on September 05, 2009, 01:02:15 AM
Quote from: derspiess on September 04, 2009, 02:50:48 PM
Saw one episode a while back where Mary Ann was showing some flabby thighs.  They were probably normal for the time, but still unappealing.  That pushed me back over into the Ginger camp.

That must have been one of those Gilligan's Island movies when she was old   -_-
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Neil on September 05, 2009, 05:56:17 AM
Too much makeup.  Looks like a prostitute.

That is all.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: dps on October 01, 2009, 11:33:08 PM
She reminds me of Carolyn Jones in the TV version of The Adams Family, except wearing white instead of black.

Sorry to ressurect the thread, but I couldn't think earlier of what she brought to mind, and suddenly it just came to me.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: merithyn on October 02, 2009, 06:52:35 AM
Quote from: Siege on September 04, 2009, 12:18:44 AM
Who's that Mary Ann chick?

This thread is worthless without pictures.

(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.creativeloafing.com%2Fblurbex%2Ffiles%2F2008%2F03%2Fmary-ann.jpg&hash=ba37193227d14c95da5b643deab9c052bd8877ad)

Ginger on the left; Mary Ann on the right
(https://languish.org/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg35.picoodle.com%2Fimg%2Fimg35%2F9%2F8%2F16%2Ff_gmmm_757a7ed.png&hash=adc6e9ad8e47922d84bac0441025b7d8d5258828)
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: charliebear on October 02, 2009, 07:59:10 AM
I find the Progressive chick annoying.  I'm quick to change the channel whenever those commercials come on.
Title: Re: That chick from Progressive
Post by: Caliga on October 02, 2009, 08:00:06 AM
Quote from: charliebear on October 02, 2009, 07:59:10 AM
I find the Progressive chick annoying.  I'm quick to change the channel whenever those commercials come on.
Television is for losers.  :hug: