Quote from: Admiral Yi on July 13, 2025, 04:12:07 PMBall girl makes Bo Jackson-like catch at minor league baseball game.
Quote from: grumbler on July 13, 2025, 10:13:36 AM. My objection to them is not that they are "horribly obsolete" but that their construction is a very poor use of limited resources.I believe that's the view of most people who say carriers are outdated.
Quote from: Tonitrus on July 12, 2025, 07:44:47 PMYeah, it was false advertising. I recall they were drones remote controlled by neural interface. Somehow the entire NATO military had been remade with them, and had no regular infantry or special operations troops left at the beginning of the series. I remember more of that now.Quote from: Darth Wagtaros on July 12, 2025, 07:04:06 PMQuote from: Tonitrus on July 12, 2025, 06:32:12 PMI remember some with that. WarBots or something.Quote from: grumbler on July 12, 2025, 06:00:07 PMQuote from: crazy canuck on July 12, 2025, 03:28:35 PMI wonder if funding priorities will change now?
Yeah, you'd hope that the US would realize that the MBT has gone the way of the battleship, and that drones (and shitloads of reserve drone pilots) are a better investment.
But I doubt it. It's still planning to build another six or so carriers.
I remember long ago reading some sci-fi novels with the silly-even-if-cool idea of submarine aircraft carriers. But submarines as large unmanned aerial drone carriers feels like not so silly of an idea.
The is exactly the onea I was thinking of.![]()
(it was silly that the "warbots" were shown as cyborg-looking things on the novel cover, but were actually just regular tanks/armored vehicles with semi-autonomous capabilities)
Page created in 0.016 seconds with 13 queries.