Quote from: Solmyr on Today at 10:42:30 AMThe only people trying to make the West a caliphate are right-wingers trying to enforce "traditional values".Well, yeah. Islamists are right-wingers.
Quote from: crazy canuck on Today at 03:50:40 PMI don't know what you mean.Quote from: Razgovory on Today at 09:46:08 AMIf you run into a bear in the woods it won't accuse you have sexual assault.
This is the sort is bullshit post that makes women rightfully distrust men.
Give the men who actually interact with women a break and shut the fuck up. This goes doubly for the men here who have to pay for it.
Quote from: Razgovory on Today at 09:46:08 AMIf you run into a bear in the woods it won't accuse you have sexual assault.
Quote from: Valmy on Today at 02:43:39 PMAnd you have to make a choice to either make an effort to assure people that no, you are a fluffy harmless bunny of a man or try to use this newfound power to your advantage. Or do one or the other depending on the situation.
Quote from: Josquius on Today at 11:48:28 AMQuote from: Sheilbh on Today at 11:06:23 AMQuote from: Jacob on Today at 01:49:17 AMHmmm... well... I live in a place where bears are fairly frequent. I can tell you that more women are killed by men every year than are killed by bears. I'd wager that the number of incidents of women having had encounters where they felt threatened or scared by a man's behaviour is orders of magnitude greater than those who've had scary encounters with bears. I think most women have felt endangered by a man at some point in there lives; and if they haven't, they know a women who has. I doubt the same is true when it comes to bears.Yes. Of women I've spoken to about it I think more or less all have experienced male violence or the threat/risk of violence. Also waited with female friends at the bus stop that I don't need at a discreet request because there's a man who is concerning them in some way.
Perhaps if you calculated the rate of scary encounters and the rate of murders per encounter, men would be statistically safer than bears due to the large number of encounters. But in terms of absolute numbers men have a much higher impact on women's safety than bears.
It seems only natural that this would impact women's threat perception. And it seems pretty silly to be offended by that, IMO.
I think it's mad to be offended by that or think it's about you.
It's made me conscious of how I behave - I mean I'm an incredibly weak, fairly herbiverous gay man but that's not clear at night when I'm walking down the street. So if I'm walking somewhere for example and I'm behind a woman on her own, chances are I'll cross the road - no extra time/impact for me, but hopefully remove something that could concern her.
Who thinks it's about them?
If a woman has been a victim of assault then it's obvious they would have this irrational fear of all men and make dangerous decisions rather than risk an encounter with their phobia.
Logically this is clearly wrong. But phobias don't follow logic so nobody can be blamed there.
But when someone hasn't been a victim of such a thing, has no such phobia, and is still pushing this idea that almost certain death, possibly being eaten alive, is better than being alone with a random man....
That a majority of men couldn't be trusted in this situation of being alone with a random woman.... That is just sexist and dumb.
Quote from: Tamas on Today at 10:19:15 AMI am not saying the majority of Muslims in Europe want caliphate I am sure they do not. What I am unsure about is how many of them are opposed to the thought enough to work against it, but that part shan't become an issue for many decades.
Page created in 0.081 seconds with 16 queries.