Quote from: Tamas on Today at 04:32:56 AM45, below average fitness (although not by too much, I hope) - is it a bad idea to try and pick up golf as a means of light exercise?
There is a course like a 5 minutes dry from here.
Also, question about cycling in the UK: I guess if seeing a sign of end of the cycle lane, one is supposed to get on the road with the cars, right?
Quote from: Hansmeister on July 12, 2025, 03:24:04 PMThe drone defense criticsm is on point, but does anyone have an army vehicle fleet that is better?Quote from: Josquius on July 11, 2025, 02:15:23 AMHeard an interesting argument the other day, that being on good terms with Ukraine going forward is a very useful thing indeed.
Ukraine has built up a huge amount of expertise and data in military drones and AI.
Russia will be sharing theirs with China. The west and friends need Ukraine to share theirs.
This looks probable for Europe. For the US as things stand....
In a complete turnaround the US might soon find its military hopelessly out dated.
The U.S. Army is pretty badly out of date when it comes to equipment. Virtually its entire vehicle fleet is archaic by now. No drone defenses, most even don't have the trophy system against anti-armor weapons. M1 and M2/3 are over 40 years old, the M1 is too heavy and too difficulty to maintain in the field (it has somehow become the Kingtiger), while the M2/3 have reached the end of their expected lifetime and have little room left for upgrades anyway. The M109 Paladin is a museum piece, hopelessly outdated artillery. The HMMWV has also reached the end of life cycle, the JLTV is more suitable to SOLIC environments. The Army doesn't won hardly any anti-drone weapons, and no low-cost drones that can be mass-produced. HQ elements are far too static and highly vulnerable to drones and rockets. The Apache has been rendered obsolete by and their function can be done better by drones.
So the Army needs:
- a Main Battle Tank replacement
- a new IFV (I think the Rheinmetall Lynx will get the nod)
- a SpH replacement (the Army is looking at the Rheinmetall RCH155)
- a new close-in ADA system
- new mobile command posts for battalion/brigade/divisions
- new lightweight vehicles (the infantry squad vehicle will address a part of this)
- whole new families of drones for every echelon
Quote from: Syt on July 12, 2025, 09:31:05 AMQuote from: Threviel on July 12, 2025, 07:32:57 AMDue to the incompetence of a generation of politicians I trained on a H&K G3 built in 1967...
So did I, 30 years ago
Quote from: Syt on July 12, 2025, 09:34:31 AMQuote from: Threviel on July 12, 2025, 07:32:57 AMWe had our final 36h exercise in blistering sun, running around in gas mask and shrapnel wests. Noone told me that soldiering was so hysterically sweaty. I sweated through and into my backpack and down to my knees.
Also: yes. Worst was the shitty "rain gear" we had. Some already got nice Goretex stuff, most of us still had rubber pants/jackets that made you sweat so much that it you'd be soaked either way.
Our basic training was during a particularly hot spell (over 30°C... it was unusual for us at the time
), and during one of our first field days, our Captain assured us we'd have enough drink. Which ended up being a bottle of sparkling water of 0.7l. To share between two people. We had a few people collapse on the march back to base from exhaustion/heat/dehydration. Our captain got thoroughly chewed out by our base chief of medical.
Though we also then shifted our field days to start at 4-5 am (by which time it would already be fairly light outside) and take a long break during midday heat.
Quote from: Syt on July 12, 2025, 09:31:05 AMQuote from: Threviel on July 12, 2025, 07:32:57 AMDue to the incompetence of a generation of politicians I trained on a H&K G3 built in 1967...
So did I, 30 years ago
Quote from: Tonitrus on July 12, 2025, 06:32:12 PMQuote from: grumbler on July 12, 2025, 06:00:07 PMQuote from: crazy canuck on July 12, 2025, 03:28:35 PMI wonder if funding priorities will change now?
Yeah, you'd hope that the US would realize that the MBT has gone the way of the battleship, and that drones (and shitloads of reserve drone pilots) are a better investment.
But I doubt it. It's still planning to build another six or so carriers.
I remember long ago reading some sci-fi novels with the silly-even-if-cool idea of submarine aircraft carriers. But submarines as large unmanned aerial drone carriers feels like not so silly of an idea.
Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.