News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

2016 elections - because it's never too early

Started by merithyn, May 09, 2013, 07:37:45 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Martinus

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on March 05, 2016, 11:06:05 PM
Quote from: Valmy on March 05, 2016, 10:54:26 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on March 05, 2016, 02:24:59 PM
Only lefties are entitled to the pronoun of their choice, I guess.

Ok I am super confused what you mean.

Jenner disagrees with Marty politically and suddenly she's he or it or they.

Err, no. My point is that I don't know what is his/her preferred reference - I have seen many conflicting messages on this and frankly I don't care. I never called Jenner "her". Furthermore, wasn't there a thread here recently where some sort of "authority" on language (some dictionary board or commission or something) agreed "officially" that "they" can be used in singular as a neutral form?

Jaron

Quote from: Martinus on March 06, 2016, 04:24:36 AM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on March 05, 2016, 11:06:05 PM
Quote from: Valmy on March 05, 2016, 10:54:26 PM
Quote from: Peter Wiggin on March 05, 2016, 02:24:59 PM
Only lefties are entitled to the pronoun of their choice, I guess.

Ok I am super confused what you mean.

Jenner disagrees with Marty politically and suddenly she's he or it or they.

Err, no. My point is that I don't know what is his/her preferred reference - I have seen many conflicting messages on this and frankly I don't care. I never called Jenner "her". Furthermore, wasn't there a thread here recently where some sort of "authority" on language (some dictionary board or commission or something) agreed "officially" that "they" can be used in singular as a neutral form?

What is it you are trying to say, creature?
Winner of THE grumbler point.

LaCroix

Quote from: garbon on March 06, 2016, 02:31:41 AMAww, poor baby.

didn't you graduate from ivy league? I thought english was their thing

Legbiter

Quote from: FunkMonk on March 06, 2016, 12:27:56 AM
Quote from: Phillip V on March 05, 2016, 10:41:44 PM
What the hell happened to Rubio?  He is doing barely better than Kasich today.

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results

I know what a loser looks like and he's a loser, believe me. A little baby loser. It's amazing how much he loses. Amazing.

:lol: :thumbsup:

Posted using 100% recycled electrons.

Martinus


Legbiter

Daddy?  :lol:

Eh, he tied Cruz and Rubio is as dead as disco.
Posted using 100% recycled electrons.

Martinus

Quote from: Legbiter on March 06, 2016, 07:02:04 AM
Daddy?  :lol:

Eh, he tied Cruz and Rubio is as dead as disco.

I have decided to follow Milo Yiannoupoulos and refer to Trump as "daddy". :P

Monoriu

Quote from: LaCroix on March 06, 2016, 06:12:57 AM
Quote from: garbon on March 06, 2016, 02:31:41 AMAww, poor baby.

didn't you graduate from ivy league? I thought english was their thing

Gardon graduated from Stanford, I think.  Mihali is the one from Harvard Law School.  Both are demi-gods :showoff:

Grinning_Colossus

Quote from: Martinus on March 06, 2016, 07:11:02 AM
Quote from: Legbiter on March 06, 2016, 07:02:04 AM
Daddy?  :lol:

Eh, he tied Cruz and Rubio is as dead as disco.

I have decided to follow Milo Yiannoupoulos and refer to Trump as "daddy". :P

Quis futuit ipsos fututores?

celedhring


CountDeMoney


lustindarkness

Grand Duke of Lurkdom

Ancient Demon

Quote from: CountDeMoney on March 06, 2016, 10:47:58 AM
SNL's "Voters for Trump" commercial from last night--

https://youtu.be/Qg0pO9VG1J8

"The uploader has not made this video available in your country." :(
Ancient Demon, formerly known as Zagys.

CountDeMoney

Quote from: Ancient Demon on March 06, 2016, 11:23:05 AM
"The uploader has not made this video available in your country." :(

TrumpStrong.

alfred russel

Quote from: Phillip V on March 05, 2016, 10:41:44 PM
What the hell happened to Rubio?  He is doing barely better than Kasich today.

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results

One thing I was wrong about is that a month ago I was arguing that only one of the Rubio / Bush / Kasich trio would make it this far. Kasich is not even competing in most states, but his small support is really harming Rubio - 538 had an analysis that if Kasich was gone that Rubio could have considerably more delegates by himself than Kasich and Rubio have in actuality. The crappy performance of Rubio undermines pressure on Kasich to drop out--if the establishment is embodied by Romney's speech, they actually want Kasich to stay in so someone has a shot against Trump in Ohio.

The conventional wisdom seems to be that if Rubio loses Florida, he needs to drop out. But if he loses Florida, he will still have more delegates than Kasich, even if Kasich wins Ohio. So I'm not sure that happens. It really would be premature for both of them to drop out--the last establishment candidate standing is going to get a lot of votes and would be well positioned in a brokered convention. Also, just in the stop Trump spirit, someone has to beat Trump in (for example) California, and Cruz seems poorly positioned to do that.

But for both of them to keep running is counterproductive--especially as we are entering the winner take all states.
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle.

I'm embarrassed. I've been making the mistake of associating with you. It won't happen again. :)
-garbon, February 23, 2014