2016 elections - because it's never too early

[Ed Anger]

What do youse guys think Hillary's optimal response to Donald's heckling would have been?  Tit for tat?  High road?

Spinebuster, Arn Anderson style.

[Admiral Yi]

So two votes for high road.

[Ed Anger]

 

[11B4V]

What do youse guys think Hillary's optimal response to Donald's heckling would have been?  Tit for tat?  High road?

In the debate and on the trail, maintain.

Behind the scenes, put the Clinton smear machine in overdrive. There's probably way more damaging stuff out there on Trump.

[Syt]

I will check if there's any fan made politician characters for WWE 2k16 tonight.

[The Larch]

I will check if there's any fan made politician characters for WWE 2k16 tonight.

You can always play as the Clintons in the old NBA Jam. 

[CountDeMoney]

If this debate wasn't a hands down win for Hilary, then it I'm of the opinion that she's a pretty poor candidate.

How do you define victory in a political debate when one of the participants isn't debating?  How can you quantify whether a candidate is effective is there isn't another one to compare with?  This whole election is one sided:  as in, only one side is participating.  Not much different than what's been going on in Washington in general.

The Clinton campaign has been running a political election campaign.  Trump has been running something entirely different: reality-TV-thread-flamewar-lone-wolf-shooter-shock-jock-cult-of-personality demagoguery.

[Jacob]

Apparently the are eyewitnesses in the child rape case against Trump: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html

[mongers]

If this debate wasn't a hands down win for Hilary, then it I'm of the opinion that she's a pretty poor candidate.

How do you define victory in a political debate when one of the participants isn't debating?  How can you quantify whether a candidate is effective is there isn't another one to compare with?  This whole election is one sided:  as in, only one side is participating.  Not much different than what's been going on in Washington in general.

The Clinton campaign has been running a political election campaign.  Trump has been running something entirely different: reality-TV-thread-flamewar-lone-wolf-shooter-shock-jock-cult-of-personality demagoguery.

You have a point there.

Maybe I'm naive and assume if one candidate points out, in a forthright way, just how off the wall another candidate is, then some of his supporters will come to their senses and realise just how unsuitable for office he is, yet still a solid 40% back him. 

[CountDeMoney]

Maybe I'm naive and assume if one candidate points out, in a forthright way, just how off the wall another candidate is, then some of his supporters will come to their senses and realise just how unsuitable for office he is, yet still a solid 40% back him. 

Mongers, for fuck's sake:  his supporters are an entire generation of GOPers, conspiracy theorists, misogynists, these-colors-don't-run patriotards raised in the FoxNews/talk radio/blogosphere bubble hating all things/everything Clinton since 1992.  And you expect the very target of their hatred to convince them that their Captain Ahab is crazy? 

Yeah, you are pretty fucking naive.

[Syt]

Posted by SMBC in August of last year.

[11B4V]

Apparently the are eyewitnesses in the child rape case against Trump: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html

The worst is yet to come.

[CountDeMoney]

Worst?  What worst?  It'll just be another shell bouncing off the hull.  And what will he do?  The same thing he's always done, in life and in this campaign, even last night:  it's Jim Jones-David Koresh-Hitler-at-the-bunker bullshit, in a take-everybody-with-me a flurry of you-will-all-pay fury.

So somebody files a child rape case against him.  Big deal.  He'll just do a mountain of Tony Montana dat's-good-chit-mang coke, threaten all those around him and, I dunno, release a sex tape of him giving cuckhold creampies to all of Bill Clinton's former accusers  I CAN SATISFY YOUR WOMEN WHEN YOU CANT

[11B4V]

  It all has an effect.

[Razgovory]

Maybe I'm naive and assume if one candidate points out, in a forthright way, just how off the wall another candidate is, then some of his supporters will come to their senses and realise just how unsuitable for office he is, yet still a solid 40% back him. 

Mongers, for fuck's sake:  his supporters are an entire generation of GOPers, conspiracy theorists, misogynists, these-colors-don't-run patriotards raised in the FoxNews/talk radio/blogosphere bubble hating all things/everything Clinton since 1992.  And you expect the very target of their hatred to convince them that their Captain Ahab is crazy? 

This.  For about 25 years she has been a national hate figure.  You have voters who have known nothing but Hillary Hate.  The right's fixation on her back in the 1990's was weird.  It's still weird.  Just take for an example something Trump said last night.  It's Hillary's fault that Trump paid no federal income tax for two decades.  She should have fixed it 30 years ago he said.  Because apparently, that's what the wife of the governor of Arkansas is suppose to do: change federal tax law.