News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Weird justice...

Started by viper37, May 21, 2009, 01:37:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

viper37

Two cases received their sentencing today.

#1
A woman tells her boyfriend it's over.  Guy takes it badly.  He goes to work, collecting trash during the day.  He sees his girlfriend with another guy.  Guy snaps.  Comes back later with a knife and stab the guys multiple times.  Victim survives.
Penalty?  2 years less one day to be served in the community (basically, he's at home and as to satisfy some conditions, including reporting to the authorities and not leaving the country; we don't have the little GPS thingie attached to the ankle like some US prisoners).


#2
A guy is verbally violent, and harrass l'Ordre des Ingénieurs du Québec (Engineers guild, sort of) for a period of 3 months over I don't know what.  Guy has been found mentally sound, enough at least to be on trial.

Granted, they guy has been accused 3 times before of such harrassment and did not receive any penalty (inconditional absolution, I think it's called, basically, it's like nothing ever happenned).

Penalty?  54 months in jail.  Nearly 5 years... and he didn't kill anyone... He didn't try to kill anyone.  He's got a loudmouth and accused the judge of being corrupt, wich might explain the sentence, but still...
I find our justice kinda weird, sometimes.
I don't do meditation.  I drink alcohol to relax, like normal people.

If Microsoft Excel decided to stop working overnight, the world would practically end.

Razgovory

How long was the woman jailed?
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

Slargos

Actually, it makes perfect sense.

In the first case, the crime is against an individual and the limit to damages against society is the loss of 2 people from the workforce. The system doesn't care if you die or if it has to throw you in prison. You're just meat walking.

In the second case, the crime is against an institution and compounded by a personal attack against the judge who represents the system. This is a crime against the state. The state generally cares when you commit crimes against it.

I got a $100 "collection fine" for forgetting to pay my swedish taxes for last year which were to the amount of $80...

The government demands its due.

Martinus

Whoa, the first case is absolutely outrageous.

The Brain

Sentencing is more of an art form than a science. It requires experience, creativity, determination and a sly sense of humor. Sometimes it misses but when it hits it's glorious.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Viking

White trash deserve harsher punishment than professionals. This is the wrong way round.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.