News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

100 million sharks for stupid Asian bullshit

Started by CountDeMoney, March 02, 2013, 09:57:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

CountDeMoney

QuotePity for a predator: 100 million sharks die each year, conservationists say

Aggressive overfishing threatens to push some shark species to extinction, and a new study puts annual shark deaths at 100 million.

"Our analysis shows that about one in 15 sharks gets killed by fisheries every year," study leader Boris Worm, a professor of biology at Canada's Dalhousie University, said in a statement. "With an increasing demand for their fins, sharks are more vulnerable today than ever before."

Based on available data for shark deaths and estimates of unreported illegal catches, the researchers estimated that 100 million sharks were killed in 2000 and 97 million in 2010. But since scientists lack sufficient data on shark catches, they say the real number of annual shark deaths could possibly be between 63 million and 273 million.

Sharks are fished for their meat, liver oil, cartilage and valuable fins, which are hacked off, often from live sharks, to be used in shark fin soup, an ancient and prized delicacy in East Asia. Since sharks have slow growth and reproductive rates, it can be tough for their populations to bounce back from big losses.

Conservationists say the depletion of shark populations is concerning because as apex predators, they help balance ecosystems in the world's oceans.

"In working with tiger sharks, we've seen that if we don't have enough of these predators around, it causes cascading changes in the ecosystem, that trickle all the way down to marine plants," said study researcher Mike Heithaus, a Florida International University biologist.

On March 3, hundreds of delegates from 177 different countries will descend on Bangkok for the meeting of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, or CITES. On the agenda will be increased trade protection for five species of sharks — the oceanic whitetip, porbeagle and three types of hammerheads — which are hunted for their fins.

"A simple vote 'yes' to support their listing could turn things around for some of the world's most threatened shark species," Elizabeth Wilson, manager of global shark conservation at the Pew Charitable Trusts' environmental organization, said in a statement. "Countries should seize this opportunity to protect these top predators from extinction."

Sharks have a PR problem that might be hurting their chances of survival. A study out last year found that a majority of the media coverage they get involves shark attacks on humans, which doesn't reflect how rare these scary encounters are. In 2012, there were 80 confirmed shark attacks worldwide, but only seven of them were deadly, according to the University of Florida's International Shark Attack File.

The new research was detailed online in the journal Marine Policy.

The nuclear exchange of the Sino-US War of 2028 simply can't come soon enough.

garbon

I hardly want to see our citizens dying for sharks.
"I've never been quite sure what the point of a eunuch is, if truth be told. It seems to me they're only men with the useful bits cut off."
I drank because I wanted to drown my sorrows, but now the damned things have learned to swim.

CountDeMoney

It'll just be #256,238 on the list, that's all.

Strix

They just need to tie frickin laser beams to their heads!  :nelson:
"I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left." - Margaret Thatcher

Eddie Teach

The ocean's a big fucking place, I doubt we could hunt sharks to extinction even if that was the goal.
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

Syt

I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.

Kleves

Quote from: CountDeMoney on March 02, 2013, 09:57:29 PM
The nuclear exchange of the Sino-US War of 2028 simply can't come soon enough.
Might want to move the timetable up a bit. We mgiht not be able to afford ICBMs and SSBNs by 2028.
My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.

Razgovory

I didn't know there even that many sharks in the world.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017

The Brain

Women want me. Men want to be with me.

Tonitrus

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on March 03, 2013, 12:21:54 AM
The ocean's a big fucking place, I doubt we could hunt sharks to extinction even if that was the goal.

I suppose whales and sea otters never had anything to worry about either.

Eddie Teach

Whales and sea otters have to come up for air.
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

KRonn

That's a lot of sharks to be around, let alone to kill! It does seem a concern though, losing so many predators, top of the food chain. The article doesn't say if there are any fishing regs on taking numbers sharks. I assume there are laws but not so much for the countries that take them for fins and such.

Jacob

Quote from: Razgovory on March 03, 2013, 02:10:54 AM
I didn't know there even that many sharks in the world.

There are a lot of smaller shark types as well, not just the big famous ones.

Jaron

It seems like if sharks died out, we could offset the imbalance to the ecosystem by increasing fishing quotas. :hmm:
Winner of THE grumbler point.

Neil

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on March 03, 2013, 12:21:54 AM
The ocean's a big fucking place, I doubt we could hunt sharks to extinction even if that was the goal.
It's doable.  The power of mankind to kill is unmatched on the Earth.
I do not hate you, nor do I love you, but you are made out of atoms which I can use for something else.