The Empire Strikes Out - Inside the Battle of Hoth

Started by MadImmortalMan, February 13, 2013, 08:08:21 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jimmy olsen

It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

C.C.R.

Quote from: The Larch on February 14, 2013, 05:02:05 AM
It's the 1st comment on the 1st article the one that takes the prize.  :lol:

QuoteHave you even served with the Imperial forces? Sure it's easy to take potshots from your military blog in some no-name star system while the fleet and its legions fight the rebel insurgents, but combined space/air/ground operations are a lot messier than any infographic could ever portray.

Even with the Empire's full spectrum dominance of the battlespace, you can't just leverage fleet assets which are optimized for ship-to-ship combat into a large scale ground invasion force. A Star Destroyer might have more firepower than the entire militaries of less advanced worlds but you still need a proper ground assault ship to support infantry landings.

Unfortunately, the do-nothing blowhards in Coruscant couldn't get funding for the promising alternative designs from Sienar Fleet Systems and we ended up (as usual) with Kuat Drive Yards' overpriced, overdue, and underperforming AT-AT mess.

Ironically, the older "Victory" class ships were far superior orbital bombardment platforms...

Berkut

Quote from: Ideologue on February 13, 2013, 08:53:21 PM
Quote from: CountDeMoney on February 13, 2013, 08:39:16 PM
This entire study would be so much more interesting if Lucas didn't shit out those goddamned prequels.

True, although the "Luke matters" chick made me really sad about how shitty the prequels were, given that they had the material for something grand.

Indeed.

The prequels may be the greatest failure in movie history, given their potential from a story-telling content, and the resources available to realize that potential.

A great potential story combined with basically unlimited resources to tell it resulted in Jar Jar Binks and whiny brat.

It really is quite sad.
"If you think this has a happy ending, then you haven't been paying attention."

select * from users where clue > 0
0 rows returned

CountDeMoney

Quote from: Berkut on February 14, 2013, 08:52:29 AM
A great potential story combined with basically unlimited resources to tell it resulted in Jar Jar Binks and whiny brat.

It really is quite sad.

You forgot the Imperial Japanese Navy and the Flying Jew.

But yeah, talk about the absolute destruction of a concept of so much promising material.  They'll still be talking about it 80 years from now. 

grumbler

Quote from: Berkut on February 14, 2013, 08:52:29 AM
Indeed.

The prequels may be the greatest failure in movie history, given their potential from a story-telling content, and the resources available to realize that potential.

A great potential story combined with basically unlimited resources to tell it resulted in Jar Jar Binks and whiny brat.

It really is quite sad.

I agree that the potential was there, but would argue that the third movie had already shown that Lucas was unable to comprehend the potential of his own creation.  The end of that movie left me with no desire to see more, quite the opposite of how I felt at the end of the first and (especially) the second movie.
The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.   -G'Kar

Bayraktar!

Ideologue

#20
Open question to those who were disappointed with Return of the Jedi: if the original plan to use Wookiees and Kashyykk (or however that's spelled, I am emphatically not looking it up), instead of Ewoks and Endor, had been followed, but the same general plot structure remained, would you have been okay with it?  If so, are you valuing appearances--conceding that Wookiees look way cooler than Ewoks--too greatly?  Or is there another aspect to the Ewoks that grates, i.e. their primitiveness, a problem that would not have been present with the incomprehensible but technologically advanced Wookiees?

Discuss, bearing in mind that we did see the Wookiee homeworld in the filmed Star Wars universe long before Episode III, and the results were intensely disturbing.

Quote from: BerkutIndeed.

The prequels may be the greatest failure in movie history, given their potential from a story-telling content, and the resources available to realize that potential.

A great potential story combined with basically unlimited resources to tell it resulted in Jar Jar Binks and whiny brat.

It really is quite sad.

Fully agreed; however, with the transfer of the Lucasfilm properties to Disney, I would not be wholly surprised if they remade the prequel trilogy within the next ten or fifteen years.  I expect there's a huge market for it, and it would be both easier from a logistical standpoint and subject the brand to less overexploration if they remade the PT instead of Random Star Wars Movies 14-16 (which, with the absence of Lucas' restraining hand, we must accept as inevitable--there's already like FIVE new Star Wars films in pipeline, mere months after the sale).
Kinemalogue
Current reviews: The 'Burbs (9/10); Gremlins 2: The New Batch (9/10); John Wick: Chapter 2 (9/10); A Cure For Wellness (4/10)

Syt

I wouldn't put it past them to do a re-boot, or go to The Old Republic for fresh stories. I've always looked at The Old Republic (4000 years before the movies) setting (the comics and later the games) as an alternative version of the "classic" Star Wars story and universe. You have the same places and concepts, but are free to do completely different things with them. Of course, several comics, novels, and games in this is starting to get crowded, too. But nothing to keep people from going further back, or slightly forward.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.

derspiess

Quote from: Ideologue on February 14, 2013, 09:40:35 AM
Discuss, bearing in mind that we did see the Wookiee homeworld in the filmed Star Wars universe long before Episode III, and the results were intensely disturbing.

Dead wrong.  It was pure awesomeness.  Life Day FTW!
"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

PDH

Quote from: derspiess on February 14, 2013, 09:54:31 AM
Quote from: Ideologue on February 14, 2013, 09:40:35 AM
Discuss, bearing in mind that we did see the Wookiee homeworld in the filmed Star Wars universe long before Episode III, and the results were intensely disturbing.

Dead wrong.  It was pure awesomeness.  Life Day FTW!

You just like them because the Ewoks didn't have whore pills.
I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth.
-Umberto Eco

-------
"I'm pretty sure my level of depression has nothing to do with how much of a fucking asshole you are."

-CdM

Ideologue

Quote from: SytI wouldn't put it past them to do a re-boot, or go to The Old Republic for fresh stories. I've always looked at The Old Republic (4000 years before the movies) setting (the comics and later the games) as an alternative version of the "classic" Star Wars story and universe. You have the same places and concepts, but are free to do completely different things with them. Of course, several comics, novels, and games in this is starting to get crowded, too. But nothing to keep people from going further back, or slightly forward.

My thing is that I've never really felt the Star Wars universe was as inherently interesting as a lot of people clearly do.  I don't think it ever matched Star Trek, for example, in terms of reusability and story modularity.  The overweening presence of the Force and the unninterrupted (and frankly hard to believe) thousands-year span of one-galaxy government and culture, at basically one technological level the entire time, homogenizes the Star Wars universe, regardless of era.  And you can't really add anything or change anything without it seeming bizarre and alien to the franchise (I think they tried some extragalactic invaders once, for example, which doesn't sound particularly interesting).  Which is fine--Flash Gordon stories don't have infinite possibilities, there's no reason Star Wars stories should.  Not all concepts should, in fact most concepts do not, lend themselves to infinite repackaging.

That's why I don't care that much about Star Wars outside of the core Skywalker parable (moral: "great, kid, [but] don't get cocky").  Like, wow, there were Sith and smugglers ten thousand years ago?  TELL ME MORE?

P.S. I'll still be disappointed if Thrawn doesn't show up somewhere in the new, post-Jedi movies.  That guy was probably the only concept from beyond the films that I ever felt had any legs whatsoever.
Kinemalogue
Current reviews: The 'Burbs (9/10); Gremlins 2: The New Batch (9/10); John Wick: Chapter 2 (9/10); A Cure For Wellness (4/10)

Ideologue

Quote from: PDH on February 14, 2013, 09:56:36 AM
Quote from: derspiess on February 14, 2013, 09:54:31 AM
Quote from: Ideologue on February 14, 2013, 09:40:35 AM
Discuss, bearing in mind that we did see the Wookiee homeworld in the filmed Star Wars universe long before Episode III, and the results were intensely disturbing.

Dead wrong.  It was pure awesomeness.  Life Day FTW!

You just like them because the Ewoks didn't have whore pills.

But they did have virtual interracial porno.
Kinemalogue
Current reviews: The 'Burbs (9/10); Gremlins 2: The New Batch (9/10); John Wick: Chapter 2 (9/10); A Cure For Wellness (4/10)

C.C.R.

Quote from: Ideologue on February 14, 2013, 10:10:37 AM
P.S. I'll still be disappointed if Thrawn doesn't show up somewhere in the new, post-Jedi movies.  That guy was probably the only concept from beyond the films that I ever felt had any legs whatsoever.

Mara Jade's unshaven red bush.  Just sayin'...

:whistle:

The Larch

Quote from: Ideologue on February 14, 2013, 10:10:37 AM
Quote from: SytI wouldn't put it past them to do a re-boot, or go to The Old Republic for fresh stories. I've always looked at The Old Republic (4000 years before the movies) setting (the comics and later the games) as an alternative version of the "classic" Star Wars story and universe. You have the same places and concepts, but are free to do completely different things with them. Of course, several comics, novels, and games in this is starting to get crowded, too. But nothing to keep people from going further back, or slightly forward.

My thing is that I've never really felt the Star Wars universe was as inherently interesting as a lot of people clearly do.  I don't think it ever matched Star Trek, for example, in terms of reusability and story modularity.  The overweening presence of the Force and the unninterrupted (and frankly hard to believe) thousands-year span of one-galaxy government and culture, at basically one technological level the entire time, homogenizes the Star Wars universe, regardless of era.  And you can't really add anything or change anything without it seeming bizarre and alien to the franchise (I think they tried some extragalactic invaders once, for example, which doesn't sound particularly interesting).  Which is fine--Flash Gordon stories don't have infinite possibilities, there's no reason Star Wars stories should.  Not all concepts should, in fact most concepts do not, lend themselves to infinite repackaging.

That's why I don't care that much about Star Wars outside of the core Skywalker parable (moral: "great, kid, [but] don't get cocky").  Like, wow, there were Sith and smugglers ten thousand years ago?  TELL ME MORE?

P.S. I'll still be disappointed if Thrawn doesn't show up somewhere in the new, post-Jedi movies.  That guy was probably the only concept from beyond the films that I ever felt had any legs whatsoever.

You really need to get out more often.

Syt

Quote from: Ideologue on February 14, 2013, 10:10:37 AMThe overweening presence of the Force and the unninterrupted (and frankly hard to believe) thousands-year span of one-galaxy government and culture, at basically one technological level the entire time, homogenizes the Star Wars universe, regardless of era.  And you can't really add anything or change anything without it seeming bizarre and alien to the franchise (I think they tried some extragalactic invaders once, for example, which doesn't sound particularly interesting).

You can still do a lot with the basic elements. Light side vs. dark side, Republic vs. Empire, Bounty Hunters, familiar worlds etc. without being weighed down by supposed canon or the expanded universe. Because the base building blocks are so elementary there's a lot of room to tell stories with them.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.

Ideologue

I'd argue that the base building blocks are so few that correspondingly few structures can be built from them.
Kinemalogue
Current reviews: The 'Burbs (9/10); Gremlins 2: The New Batch (9/10); John Wick: Chapter 2 (9/10); A Cure For Wellness (4/10)