Will it ever be economically feasible to colonize the solar system?

Started by Razgovory, January 03, 2013, 02:31:16 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Neil

Satellite constellations are dangerous, and such a project is too expensive to complete.  Also, the areas that you're beaming the power into will suffer heavy environmental damage.
I do not hate you, nor do I love you, but you are made out of atoms which I can use for something else.

Strix

Quote from: Neil on January 04, 2013, 12:11:43 PM
Quote from: The Brain on January 04, 2013, 12:08:09 PM
Why are people discussing prisoner colonists?
Strix doesn't understand the expense of space travel.

I do understand the costs. I was just exploring other avenues that help reduce that cost and make it more acceptable.
"I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left." - Margaret Thatcher

Neil

Quote from: Strix on January 07, 2013, 10:22:37 AM
Quote from: Neil on January 04, 2013, 12:11:43 PM
Quote from: The Brain on January 04, 2013, 12:08:09 PM
Why are people discussing prisoner colonists?
Strix doesn't understand the expense of space travel.
I do understand the costs. I was just exploring other avenues that help reduce that cost and make it more acceptable.
Were you?  Or were you trying to set things up so you could get a cool job in space, maybe sort of like Sean Connery in Outland?
I do not hate you, nor do I love you, but you are made out of atoms which I can use for something else.

Crazy_Ivan80

Quote from: Neil on January 07, 2013, 08:40:11 AM
Satellite constellations are dangerous,
and such a project is too expensive to complete.
Also, the areas that you're beaming the power into will suffer heavy environmental damage.

so is crossing the street
probably cheaper then funding the US military
we're fucked on that front anyway so I suggest beaming the energy back over Russia, China and the Middle East (in no particular order)

Iormlund

Quote from: Neil on January 07, 2013, 08:40:11 AM
Satellite constellations are dangerous, and such a project is too expensive to complete.  Also, the areas that you're beaming the power into will suffer heavy environmental damage.

It is expensive, but not so much in the scenario postulated.

As for the rest, a wide enough microwave beam* would only raise local temperatures a bit -- and you could set up the arrays only to be able to respond to a beacon from the receiver. We're not talking orbital bombardment here.

* Microwaves are probably best option because they are not blocked by the atmosphere.

ulmont

Quote from: Neil on January 07, 2013, 08:40:11 AM
Satellite constellations are dangerous, and such a project is too expensive to complete.  Also, the areas that you're beaming the power into will suffer heavy environmental damage.

Isn't Japan working on this now?

jimmy olsen

Quote from: Neil on January 07, 2013, 08:40:11 AM
Satellite constellations are dangerous, and such a project is too expensive to complete.  Also, the areas that you're beaming the power into will suffer heavy environmental damage.
Why? What kind of damage?
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point