The Great Debate Megathread! Black Lincoln versus whiter, richer Douglas!

Started by Sheilbh, October 02, 2012, 10:02:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

CountDeMoney

Unfortunately, after an hour, I see no real home runs hit by either candidate so far.

FunkMonk

Romster started brightly, Obama slowly got into the game but has caught up. It's a wash so far.
Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

Sheilbh

Romney won taxes and regulations.  Obama won entitlements.  Obama's losing healthcare.

More importantly Obama's got this wrong.  He needs meaningless anecdotes of someone from Peoria complaining, rather than mentioning 'healthcare economists' :bleeding:  And he should be beating Romney over the head with that 1-10 revenue/spending line.

The one worry for Romney is I don't know that this looks credible on all the points.  A lot of this comes down to who you believe and right now I think there's a credibility issue on his line about re-funding Medicare and revenue neutral tax cuts - it doesn't sound like what anyone will have heard from any Republican this year.  It's the right strategy though, as is his compassion in this and that he returns everything to jobs.  This should be, for him, an election about jobs above all else.
Let's bomb Russia!

mongers

The foreign policy one will be more interesting, especially in the light of current events in the Middle East.
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

Kleves

My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.

derspiess

I had to pause to put my little girl to bed so I'm about 20 minutes behind, but from what I've seen Willard seems more polished and confident.  I agree no home runs, but this debate format seems to play more to Willard's strengths.

And this should be Lehrer's last ever debate.
"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

CountDeMoney

Quote from: Sheilbh on October 03, 2012, 09:10:12 PM
The one worry for Romney is I don't know that this looks credible on all the points.  A lot of this comes down to who you believe and right now I think there's a credibility issue on his line about re-funding Medicare and revenue neutral tax cuts - it doesn't sound like what anyone will have heard from any Republican this year.  It's the right strategy though, as is his compassion in this and that he returns everything to jobs.  This should be, for him, an election about jobs above all else.

I was a little surprised that Mittens was willing to wade in so deeply into Obamacare myself, particularly since he's been so opaque on his own plan: yeah, he wants to keep the "best parts" like pre-existing and let the states buy in (which they are able to do now anyway), and yet repeal it.  Don't get that.  Why Obama didn't just say, "well, I already did it, the Supreme Court upheld the issue, and it is now the law of the land. Case closed."

Sheilbh

WHO IS THIS OLD ANNOYING MAN?

It's like the Third Republic.  Why are all the debate moderators septuagenarians?  Because the octogenarians are dead.

Obama's education policy is an unsung success.  Romney's doing well on education so far.

But I think Obama ultimately won healthcare.

I like this Romney answer.  Good compassionate conservatism - though I did hope the 'pursuit of happiness' riff would be to announce his sudden support for gay marriage.

Quote"Mr. President, you're no Abe Lincoln."
'Mr President, my ancestors fled Abe Lincoln to live their polygamous lives.  My ancestors, feared Abe Lincoln.  Mr President, you're no Abe Lincoln.'

QuoteI was a little surprised that Mittens was willing to wade in so deeply into Obamacare myself, particularly since he's been so opaque on his own plan: yeah, he wants to keep the "best parts" like pre-existing and let the states buy in (which they are able to do now anyway), and yet repeal it.  Don't get that.  Why Obama didn't just say, "well, I already did it, the Supreme Court upheld the issue, and it is now the law of the land. Case closed."
I think Obama's response on Romney's opaqueness was his best yet.  He should be saying something similar to every question.  I know what Romney's message is in this debate - I don't know what Obama's is yet.
Let's bomb Russia!

Sheilbh

Let's bomb Russia!

Sheilbh

Here's an issue.  Romney - in this debate - has said he wants to increase funding to the military and to Medicare, his tax reform will be revenue neutral and he won't cut education.  How can he be credible on the deficit?

Also his 'I'm all for green jobs' line is very good.
Let's bomb Russia!

merithyn

Quote from: CountDeMoney on October 03, 2012, 09:18:01 PM
I was a little surprised that Mittens was willing to wade in so deeply into Obamacare myself, particularly since he's been so opaque on his own plan: yeah, he wants to keep the "best parts" like pre-existing and let the states buy in (which they are able to do now anyway), and yet repeal it.  Don't get that.  Why Obama didn't just say, "well, I already did it, the Supreme Court upheld the issue, and it is now the law of the land. Case closed."

He'll kick himself for not doing that very thing come tomorrow morning.

What IS Romney going to cut? He's yet to say a single thing that he's going to cut....

Oh wait. It seems that he's going to cut green energy funding. Brilliant. :frusty:
Yesterday, upon the stair,
I met a man who wasn't there
He wasn't there again today
I wish, I wish he'd go away...

CountDeMoney

Quote from: derspiess on October 03, 2012, 09:15:23 PM
I had to pause to put my little girl to bed so I'm about 20 minutes behind, but from what I've seen Willard seems more polished and confident.  I agree no home runs, but this debate format seems to play more to Willard's strengths.

I agree it fits Mittens more, and he came out more "emotionally invested" than the POTUS, but I think we all kinda knew that going in.  Obama's a bit of a cold fish in this format, but Mittens has done well in reigning in his snarkiness, except when it comes to beating up on PBS employees.

I really don't see this debate moving the needle much, except maybe a slight bump for Mittens for those who've never watched him.  I think the next two debates should definitely be much more interesting, and could really move the numbers much.

Valmy

Quote from: Sheilbh on October 03, 2012, 09:23:18 PM
Here's an issue.  Romney - in this debate - has said he wants to increase funding to the military and to Medicare, his tax reform will be revenue neutral and he won't cut education.  How can he be credible on the deficit?

Yeah I mentioned this during the Convention.  It makes no sense.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

CountDeMoney


CountDeMoney

Weak close, Mr. President.  Self-effacement works, but the rest of it sucked.