News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Europa Universalis IV announced

Started by Octavian, August 10, 2012, 10:05:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Viking

Quote from: jimmy olsen on October 14, 2013, 12:41:12 AM
Have the initial balancing issues been adequately addressed yet?

I, as prussia with 65 force limits allied to novgorod 20, just fought a coalition of Muscovy 120, Lithuania 70 and Denmark 30 with a similar manpower balance to a standstill. And was stab hitting them... when France, Netherlands, Castille and Britain attacked me.

So, no, not balanced.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Anatron

Quote from: Viking on October 14, 2013, 04:45:29 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on October 14, 2013, 12:41:12 AM
Have the initial balancing issues been adequately addressed yet?

I, as prussia with 65 force limits allied to novgorod 20, just fought a coalition of Muscovy 120, Lithuania 70 and Denmark 30 with a similar manpower balance to a standstill. And was stab hitting them... when France, Netherlands, Castille and Britain attacked me.

So, no, not balanced.

I asked Dorukhan and Signon to use mods from now on to improve the balance in the game.But they are not interested.

Habbaku

Quote from: Viking on October 14, 2013, 04:45:29 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on October 14, 2013, 12:41:12 AM
Have the initial balancing issues been adequately addressed yet?

I, as prussia with 65 force limits allied to novgorod 20, just fought a coalition of Muscovy 120, Lithuania 70 and Denmark 30 with a similar manpower balance to a standstill. And was stab hitting them... when France, Netherlands, Castille and Britain attacked me.


:hmm:  Sounds like standard Viking diplomacy at work to me.
The medievals were only too right in taking nolo episcopari as the best reason a man could give to others for making him a bishop. Give me a king whose chief interest in life is stamps, railways, or race-horses; and who has the power to sack his Vizier (or whatever you care to call him) if he does not like the cut of his trousers.

Government is an abstract noun meaning the art and process of governing and it should be an offence to write it with a capital G or so as to refer to people.

-J. R. R. Tolkien

Zanza

Playing the Ottomans is fun. You can just expand in all directions at the same time for the first several decades of the game. I have a -400 relation modifier from aggressive expansion with the Mamluks by now. :)  Yet no one wants to join the fuckers in a coalition.

Viking

Quote from: Habbaku on October 14, 2013, 12:20:44 PM
Quote from: Viking on October 14, 2013, 04:45:29 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on October 14, 2013, 12:41:12 AM
Have the initial balancing issues been adequately addressed yet?

I, as prussia with 65 force limits allied to novgorod 20, just fought a coalition of Muscovy 120, Lithuania 70 and Denmark 30 with a similar manpower balance to a standstill. And was stab hitting them... when France, Netherlands, Castille and Britain attacked me.


:hmm:  Sounds like standard Viking diplomacy at work to me.

hey, I learned my lesson from last time, this time it was meta-revenge from slargos
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Anatron

Quote from: Zanza on October 14, 2013, 01:11:12 PM
Playing the Ottomans is fun. You can just expand in all directions at the same time for the first several decades of the game. I have a -400 relation modifier from aggressive expansion with the Mamluks by now. :)  Yet no one wants to join the fuckers in a coalition.

Ottos are OP.I hope they will get a massive nerf in the next patch.

DGuller

Quote from: Habbaku on October 14, 2013, 12:20:44 PM
Quote from: Viking on October 14, 2013, 04:45:29 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on October 14, 2013, 12:41:12 AM
Have the initial balancing issues been adequately addressed yet?

I, as prussia with 65 force limits allied to novgorod 20, just fought a coalition of Muscovy 120, Lithuania 70 and Denmark 30 with a similar manpower balance to a standstill. And was stab hitting them... when France, Netherlands, Castille and Britain attacked me.


:hmm:  Sounds like standard Viking diplomacy at work to me.
:lmfao:

Valmy

Quote from: Anatron on October 14, 2013, 02:05:36 PM
Ottos are OP.I hope they will get a massive nerf in the next patch.

I believe that is an exact quote from John VIII at the Council of Florence.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

jimmy olsen

Quote from: Viking on October 14, 2013, 04:45:29 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on October 14, 2013, 12:41:12 AM
Have the initial balancing issues been adequately addressed yet?

I, as prussia with 65 force limits allied to novgorod 20, just fought a coalition of Muscovy 120, Lithuania 70 and Denmark 30 with a similar manpower balance to a standstill. And was stab hitting them... when France, Netherlands, Castille and Britain attacked me.

So, no, not balanced.
So, 85 to 210... :hmm:

Depending on techlevels I can see that working. You just have to be able to successfully overrun Jutland at the beginning. You have the advantage of interior lines and having all your provinces and men close together on the map, instead of spread out like Muscovy.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

Viking

Quote from: jimmy olsen on October 15, 2013, 01:43:01 AM
Quote from: Viking on October 14, 2013, 04:45:29 AM
Quote from: jimmy olsen on October 14, 2013, 12:41:12 AM
Have the initial balancing issues been adequately addressed yet?

I, as prussia with 65 force limits allied to novgorod 20, just fought a coalition of Muscovy 120, Lithuania 70 and Denmark 30 with a similar manpower balance to a standstill. And was stab hitting them... when France, Netherlands, Castille and Britain attacked me.

So, no, not balanced.
So, 85 to 210... :hmm:

Depending on techlevels I can see that working. You just have to be able to successfully overrun Jutland at the beginning. You have the advantage of interior lines and having all your provinces and men close together on the map, instead of spread out like Muscovy.

Didn't overrun anything, I was on the defensive the whole time. It was the prussian ideas that made the difference. At start I had 12, Muscovy had 13 and at the end I had 16, Muscovy had 15. The prussian army was in autokill mode until france and castille and holland threw another 240 regiments at me from the west and I called in allies.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Zanza

Quote from: Valmy on October 14, 2013, 04:08:18 PM
Quote from: Anatron on October 14, 2013, 02:05:36 PM
Ottos are OP.I hope they will get a massive nerf in the next patch.

I believe that is an exact quote from John VIII at the Council of Florence.
They conquered like 100 EU4 provinces in less than 120 years in reality, so for historicity sake, they must be OP. However that obviously makes for poor multiplayer which is what Anatron is interested in. But that has never been the main focus of Paradox' games.

Syt

Quote from: Zanza on October 15, 2013, 04:36:13 PM
They conquered like 100 EU4 provinces in less than 120 years in reality, so for historicity sake, they must be OP. However that obviously makes for poor multiplayer which is what Anatron is interested in. But that has never been the main focus of Paradox' games.

Incorrect. With the long life of the EU2 MP community, EU3 was at release geared towards a balanced MP experience. Which is why the original release was so bland and all nations played more or less the same.

Fortunately this was corrected, when Johan & Co. realized that while the MP is vocal, the SP community is in the majority.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.

DGuller

Quote from: Zanza on October 15, 2013, 04:36:13 PM
Quote from: Valmy on October 14, 2013, 04:08:18 PM
Quote from: Anatron on October 14, 2013, 02:05:36 PM
Ottos are OP.I hope they will get a massive nerf in the next patch.

I believe that is an exact quote from John VIII at the Council of Florence.
They conquered like 100 EU4 provinces in less than 120 years in reality, so for historicity sake, they must be OP. However that obviously makes for poor multiplayer which is what Anatron is interested in. But that has never been the main focus of Paradox' games.
How much was it a result of subsequent luck rather than a starting position and setup?  In real life, Ottomans had a really good streak going with excellent rulers that gave them shitloads of monarch points and awesome generals.

DGuller

Same could apply to Prussia as well.  Was Brandeburg destined to be the state that united Germany, or was it just a lucky blobber?

Queequeg

Quote from: DGuller on October 15, 2013, 11:12:53 PM
Same could apply to Prussia as well.  Was Brandeburg destined to be the state that united Germany, or was it just a lucky blobber?
I think they had a string of some truly exceptional rulers and this could appropriately be handled by giving them "luck", considering that you can't hardcode union with the Duchy of Prussia or the Calvinist immigrants that were the foundation of the economy. 
Quote from: PDH on April 25, 2009, 05:58:55 PM
"Dysthymia?  Did they get some student from the University of Chicago with a hard-on for ancient Bactrian cities to name this?  I feel cheated."