News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

The State of Affairs in Russia

Started by Syt, August 01, 2012, 12:01:36 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Queequeg

#1155
Quote from: Martinus on December 28, 2014, 04:56:03 PM
Russia never had capitalism before the Soviets - it went straight from feudalism to communism. You can argue some similarities with China there, but on top of that the Chinese had a history of functioning bureaucracy and administration - the only good period Russia had by contrast was when it tried to Westernise under Peter the Great.
Russia didn't really have Feudalism.  That's a Marxist myth.  I don't think Feudalism really works as a model east of the Danube.  The Ottomans and Russians based their economic and political structures on Byzantium and the Mongol Empire, both of which were profoundly autocratic and centralized in a way totally foreign to Medieval and Early Modern Western Europe. 

I also think you are overstating the case.  Russia's government between Peter the Great and Catherine was generally pretty good.  Beating Napoleon was as much the triumph of the Russian military and governance as the winter.  Problem is, as with all strict authoritarian regimes with particularly vicious extractive institutions, it pretty quickly devolved in to nepotism and incoherence.  Even then, though, in 1914-1917 there was a real civil society that managed to put up a pretty good effort through most of WWI even while the house was catching fire. 

I think China has a history of respect for authority and meritocracy that Russia never totally did. There's a village-y equalizing tenancy and post-Soviet/late Empire cynicism that make Putin's brand of honest nepotism acceptable and not seem not that much different from the West.  That's probably as important as anything.  It took Mao, the Japanese and the Warlords to kill off the ineffectual Chinese noble-bureaucrat with massively long fingernails  who believed competent governance was knowing all of the Confucian canon but after that class died off the respect for authority and principle of merit survived. 
Quote from: PDH on April 25, 2009, 05:58:55 PM
"Dysthymia?  Did they get some student from the University of Chicago with a hard-on for ancient Bactrian cities to name this?  I feel cheated."

Queequeg

Quote from: Razgovory on December 28, 2014, 03:55:52 PM
Quote from: Queequeg on December 28, 2014, 12:51:06 PM
Quote from: Admiral Yi on December 28, 2014, 12:24:29 PM
Quote from: Queequeg on December 28, 2014, 12:00:00 PM
Weber's entire argument was that Confucianism gave no respect to the profit motive.

How has that worked out for him?
Weber was accurately descibing the last 500 years of Chinese history.

Ehhhhh.  You really need to stop with this academic hero worship.
Weber is Weber. 
Quote from: PDH on April 25, 2009, 05:58:55 PM
"Dysthymia?  Did they get some student from the University of Chicago with a hard-on for ancient Bactrian cities to name this?  I feel cheated."

Berkut

Quote from: Jacob on December 28, 2014, 11:56:17 PM
Quote from: Razgovory on December 27, 2014, 09:52:27 PM
When China shifted toward market socialism there was a ready supply of Chinese exiles that could come back to the country to help set it up. 

I don't think (though not 100% sure) that this is accurate. It is not my impression that the Chinese diaspora returned to the PRC after the shit to market socialism.


Purely anecdotal of course, but my best friend through high school and college was Chinese, his father fought with the Nationalists in WW2, fled to Taiwan, then emigrated to the US.

His father and himself both returned to China, once it was allowed/safe. His father in business making clothes, and he started a university that coordinates with the University of Arizona to do exchange programs. So in that case, there was most certainly a return of emigres back to China.

I don't know or claim that it is representative of a trend though.
"If you think this has a happy ending, then you haven't been paying attention."

select * from users where clue > 0
0 rows returned

Syt

I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.
—Stephen Jay Gould

Proud owner of 42 Zoupa Points.

Jacob

Quote from: Berkut on December 29, 2014, 08:13:10 AM
Purely anecdotal of course, but my best friend through high school and college was Chinese, his father fought with the Nationalists in WW2, fled to Taiwan, then emigrated to the US.

His father and himself both returned to China, once it was allowed/safe. His father in business making clothes, and he started a university that coordinates with the University of Arizona to do exchange programs. So in that case, there was most certainly a return of emigres back to China.

I don't know or claim that it is representative of a trend though.

That's pretty cool. Maybe it's more common than I thought, I'm no expert.

You should go visit him some time :)

dps

Quote from: Queequeg on December 29, 2014, 02:15:10 AM

Russia didn't really have Feudalism.  That's a Marxist myth.  I don't think Feudalism really works as a model east of the Danube.  The Ottomans and Russians based their economic and political structures on Byzantium and the Mongol Empire, both of which were profoundly autocratic and centralized in a way totally foreign to Medieval and Early Modern Western Europe. 

Uhm, depends on exactly what one means by feudalism.  AFAIK, Russia never really had the vassal/overlord relationships that characterized feudalism in, say, Germany, but to a lot of people, having serfdom equals feudalism.    Of course, that's not really an accurate definition of feudalism, but I'm not sure what else you'd call the economic structure of Imperial Russia.  It certainly wasn't market capitalism, and mercantilism doesn't fit either.  As I understand it, it was basically a barter economy.

Queequeg

#1161
Quote from: dps on December 29, 2014, 01:38:53 PM
Quote from: Queequeg on December 29, 2014, 02:15:10 AM

Russia didn't really have Feudalism.  That's a Marxist myth.  I don't think Feudalism really works as a model east of the Danube.  The Ottomans and Russians based their economic and political structures on Byzantium and the Mongol Empire, both of which were profoundly autocratic and centralized in a way totally foreign to Medieval and Early Modern Western Europe. 

Uhm, depends on exactly what one means by feudalism.  AFAIK, Russia never really had the vassal/overlord relationships that characterized feudalism in, say, Germany, but to a lot of people, having serfdom equals feudalism.    Of course, that's not really an accurate definition of feudalism, but I'm not sure what else you'd call the economic structure of Imperial Russia.  It certainly wasn't market capitalism, and mercantilism doesn't fit either.  As I understand it, it was basically a barter economy.
Uh, probably closest to something like the economies of the ancient world.  Pretty close to a Palace economy, or maybe the Byzantine economy without Constantinople.  The Tsar had waaaaay too much power and authority to make a decent comparison with Medieval Europe.  There also wouldn't really be Manorialism of the type we'd recognize from Europe until it was introduced artificially by Peter.  Even then it was awkward. 
Quote from: PDH on April 25, 2009, 05:58:55 PM
"Dysthymia?  Did they get some student from the University of Chicago with a hard-on for ancient Bactrian cities to name this?  I feel cheated."

The Brain

The Nobel family made millions in Russia. AFAIK they didn't use barter.
Women want me. Men want to be with me.


Eddie Teach

They really should arrange that list by ratio of favorable to unfavorable.

And really, 60% of Pakistanis were like "Russia? Who the fuck are they?"  :lmfao:
To sleep, perchance to dream. But in that sleep of death, what dreams may come?

Sheilbh

Quote from: Peter Wiggin on December 30, 2014, 10:23:30 AM
And really, 60% of Pakistanis were like "Russia? Who the fuck are they?"  :lmfao:
I liked that :lol:

Also surprised by India.
Let's bomb Russia!

Admiral Yi



Martinus

Quote from: Admiral Yi on December 30, 2014, 10:29:18 AM
Greece is interesting.

Yes, the only traitors within the EU. They should be kicked out - and I don't think anyone would miss them.

CountDeMoney

The fuck, Vietnam?  Is this still First Blood: Part II?