Analysis: China's aggressive military ambition; Mono says don't worry about it

[CountDeMoney]

Firepower bristles in South China Sea as rivalries harden
'China is a completely different actor now. Security planners are wondering if it is like this now, what is it going to be like in 20 years' time?' defense analyst says

In the early years of China's rise to economic and military prowess, the guiding principle for its government was Deng Xiaoping's maxim: "Hide Your Strength, Bide Your Time."

Now, more than three decades after paramount leader Deng launched his reforms, that policy has seemingly lapsed or simply become unworkable as China's military muscle becomes too expansive to conceal and its ambitions too pressing to postpone.

The current squabble with Southeast Asian nations over territorial claims in the energy-rich South China Sea is a prime manifestation of this change, especially the standoff with the Philippines over Scarborough Shoal.

"This is not what we saw 20 years ago," said Ross Babbage, a defense analyst and founder of the Canberra-based Kokoda Foundation, an independent security policy unit.

"China is a completely different actor now. Security planners are wondering if it is like this now, what is it going to be like in 20 years' time?"

As China also continues to modernize its navy at breakneck speed, a growing sense of unease over Beijing's long-term ambitions has galvanized the exact response Deng was anxious to avoid, regional security experts say.

In what is widely interpreted as a counter to China's growing influence, the United States is pushing ahead with a muscular realignment of its forces towards the Asia-Pacific region, despite Washington's fatigue with wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the Pentagon's steep budget cuts.

'US strategic rebalancing'
And regional nations, including those with a history of adversarial or distant relations with the United States, are embracing Washington's so-called strategic pivot to Asia.

"In recent years, because of the tensions and disputes in the South China Sea, most regional states in Southeast Asia seem to welcome and support U.S. strategic rebalancing in the region," said Li Mingjiang, an assistant professor and China security policy expert at Singapore's Nanyang Technological University.

"Very likely, this trend will continue in coming years."

Last week, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta laid out the details of the firepower the Obama administration plans to swing to the Asia-Pacific region.

As part of the strategic pivot unveiled in January, the United States will deploy 60 per cent of its warships in the Asia-Pacific, up from 50 percent now. They will include six aircraft carriers and a majority of the U.S. navy's cruisers, destroyers, littoral combat ships and submarines.

"Make no mistake, in a steady, deliberate and sustainable way, the United States military is rebalancing and bringing an enhanced capability development to this vital region," Panetta told the Shangri-La Dialogue, an annual security conference in Singapore attended by civilian and military leaders from Asia-Pacific and Western nations.

Two-month standoff
For some of China's smaller neighbors like the Philippines, there is a pressing urgency to build warmer security ties with Washington.

A two-month standoff between the Philippines and China over Scarborough Shoal shows no sign of resolution, with both sides deploying paramilitary ships and fishing boats to the disputed chain of rocks, reefs and small islands about 130 miles from the Philippines.

Philippine President Benigno Aquino met President Barack Obama on Friday at the White House, where the two discussed expanding military and economic ties.

Obama later told reporters that clear, international rules were needed to resolve maritime disputes in the South China Sea.

While the standoff continues, reports last week in China's state-controlled media and online military websites suggested that the first of a new class of a stealthy littoral combat frigate, the type 056, had been launched at Shanghai's Hudong shipyard with three others under construction.

Naval analysts said the new 1,700-ton ship, armed with a 76mm main gun, missiles and anti-submarine torpedoes, would be ideal for patrolling the South China Sea.

These new warships would easily outgun the warships of rival claimants, they said.

The type 056 is the latest example of an accelerated military buildup that allows China to dominate its offshore waters.

While these warships were designed for lower-level regional conflict, experts say one of the primary goals of Beijing's wider deployment of advanced, long-range missiles, stealthy submarines, strike aircraft and cyber weapons appears to be countering the U.S. military in the region.

"China is investing in a whole raft of capabilities to undermine the U.S. presence in the Western and Central Pacific," said Babbage, a former senior Australian defense official.

"It is a fundamental challenge to the U.S. in Asia."

Panetta and other U.S. officials routinely reject suggestions that the pivot is aimed at China but military commentators in Beijing appear in no doubt.

In a report last week on the U.S. military, the China Strategic Culture Promotion Association, a non-government security analysis group, said Beijing should be on alert in response to the U.S. military "return to Asia" and any attempt to intervene in disputes in the South China Sea.

In a separate commentary published in the state-controlled media, the group's executive vice president, outspoken retired Major General Luo Yuan, said the U.S. pivot was part of "watching brief" on a rising China.

"The U.S. military has developed four different plans to combat the Chinese military," Luo wrote, but gave no details.

Luo, a government adviser, is one of a number of senior Chinese officials and commentators who have called for a more determined effort from Beijing to safeguard China's maritime interests. This suggests China will become more assertive in the South China Sea but it is unlikely to use force, according to Nanyang University's Li.

"Beijing understands very well that any military confrontation would have a profound negative impact on China's strategic position in the Asia-Pacific and China's relations with regional states," Li said.

The worry however is that a mistake or a miscalculation could trigger a confrontation.

Reaching out
As part of his swing through Asia last week, Panetta also visited India and Vietnam in a bid to enhance security ties with two key regional powers that have not been traditional U.S. allies but are increasingly apprehensive about China's rise.

At Vietnam's deep water port of Cam Ranh Bay, a key U.S. base during the Vietnam War, Panetta said the use of this harbor would be important to the Pentagon as it moved more ships to Asia.

Later, in New Delhi, Panetta said ties between the two nations were improving rapidly but expanded defense cooperation was needed to boost regional and global security.

He said the United States planned to increase its military presence and defense partnerships in an arc from the Western Pacific, through East Asia, South Asia and into the Indian Ocean.

"Defense cooperation with India is a linchpin in this strategy," he said.

In a development that will be further cause for concern in Beijing, the fleshed-out U.S. pivot and renewed commitment to regional defense ties won strong endorsement from key allies, even those who rely on growing trade with China.

On a visit to Beijing, Australian Defense Minister Stephen Smith said the U.S. presence in Asia had been a force for peace, stability and prosperity since the end of World War Two.

"Australia welcomes very much the fact that not only will the United States continue that engagement, it will enhance it," he said in a speech to the China Institute of International Strategic Studies.

Smith noted that two-way trade between Australia and China reached $120 billion last year but Canberra would continue to deepen its military ties with the U.S., including the rotational deployment of up to 2,500 U.S. troops through Darwin.

If the standoff over Scarborough Shoal is a guide to future territorial disagreements, Beijing can expect other regional nations to feel the same way.

"The South China Sea disputes are likely to remain as a regional security spotlight issue and it will continue to pester China's relations with those claimant states," Li said.

[Crazy_Ivan80]

mhhh, I guess a "USA!USA!USA!" is in order here?

[Jacob]

A conventional arms race! How exciting!

[mongers]

Trade is China's deadliest 'weapon' deployed against the USA; and every other American, including Money with his Best Buy flat-screen, is a fifth-columnist. 

[Ideologue]

Oh, for God's sakes.  Deep budget cuts?  You know how much money it costs to win a war with the PRC?  About ten minutes' salary for about fifty airmen.  Hell, you'd save money, because once you're done, you can lay off the airmen.

[Tamas]

Trade is China's deadliest 'weapon' deployed against the USA; and every other American, including Money with his Best Buy flat-screen, is a fifth-columnist. 

Please. If trade stops, yes, the American standard of living will decrease, maybe substantially on the short term, but then you know what happens? Manufacturing jobs appear on their home soil, and they go back to buying the stuff they make themselves. Boo-hoo.

What happens to China if trade stops? Yes.

[Josquius]

Firepower bristles in South China Sea as rivalries harden
'China is a completely different actor now. Security planners are wondering if it is like this now, what is it going to be like in 20 years' time?' defense analyst says

Old and struggling.
Next question.

[Monoriu]

Don't worry about it 

[Eddie Teach]

Don't worry about it 

These are not the ICBMs you're looking for.

[CountDeMoney]

Trade is China's deadliest 'weapon' deployed against the USA; and every other American, including Money with his Best Buy flat-screen, is a fifth-columnist. 

Same old bullshit argument people have been touting for years.  ZOMG GERMANY AND FRANCE WILL NEVER FIGHT THEIR ECONOMIES RELY ON EACH OTHER

[grumbler]

Please. If trade stops, yes, the American standard of living will decrease, maybe substantially on the short term, but then you know what happens? Manufacturing jobs appear on their home soil, and they go back to buying the stuff they make themselves. Boo-hoo.

What happens to China if trade stops? Yes.

Only an idiot would think that, sans China, the crap manufacturing jobs would return to the US.  If trade with China stops, the Vietnamese and Thais replace the Chinese.

If all trade stops, then the US is fucked, because underwear would cost a fortune and no one could afford it because of all the jobs lost due to lack of exports.

Mercantilism FTL.

[Grey Fox]

It's still going to be worse for China because now they'll have hundreds of millions of jobless citizen rioting & the Unified forces busy quelling that instead of expanding China.

Altho, I don't think that would stop War between NATO & China.

[Tamas]

So you will have two bad months before other shitholes prop up their production. Big deal

[Tonitrus]

It's still going to be worse for China because now they'll have hundreds of millions of jobless citizen rioting & the Unified forces busy quelling that instead of expanding China.

Altho, I don't think that would stop War between NATO & China.

War with NATO and China?  Nah, our Euro partners would sell us out over exports in a hot second.

[Grey Fox]

It's just us, North Americans then.

Brothers in Arms!