10 military technologies that will change the battlefield

Started by viper37, May 31, 2012, 02:36:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

viper37

I don't do meditation.  I drink alcohol to relax, like normal people.

If Microsoft Excel decided to stop working overnight, the world would practically end.

CountDeMoney

I could definitely see the Load Exoskeleton be the biggest hit, if it's as good as advertised.  Anything that improves the lot of the average trooper who has to hump it.

And I really, really like that mortar control system.

derspiess

Quote from: CountDeMoney on May 31, 2012, 02:40:29 PM
I could definitely see the Load Exoskeleton be the biggest hit, if it's as good as advertised.  Anything that improves the lot of the average trooper who has to hump it.

I'm sure they'll just end up being loaded down with more shit to carry.
"If you can play a guitar and harmonica at the same time, like Bob Dylan or Neil Young, you're a genius. But make that extra bit of effort and strap some cymbals to your knees, suddenly people want to get the hell away from you."  --Rich Hall

DGuller

None of that seems particularly revolutionary to me, except the last one.  All of them seems to be improvements upon the tactics already in use. 

Brazen

The new version of the HULC exoskeleton with extended battery life will be delivered for field trials in September. Can you image the power dying on you mid-patrol? It's far from finalised, though, only this week the US Army funded further development work on a completely new solution made by an advanced prosthetics company.

The CROWS addition with dazzling light derives from anti-piracy technology and is unlikely to be effective on land.

Adaptiv is fun but needs more work and smaller pixels to be effective. It's usable now to prevent friendly fire as it can transmit an identifying heat signal.

I'd have chosen the K-MAX unmanned logistics helicopter as the game-changing UAV.

I recently attended the Soldier Technology show. Talk to soldiers and they just want reliable battery power (not necessarily longer just a guarantee it will last the mission) and less weight so they can carry more food and ammo. They actually got excited about new materials that will reduce the weight of their backpack by a couple of kilos. Oh, and not to have their nads blown off or brain damage.

Cecil

Quote from: Brazen on May 31, 2012, 03:17:22 PM
The new version of the HULC exoskeleton with extended battery life will be delivered for field trials in September. Can you image the power dying on you mid-patrol? It's far from finalised, though, only this week the US Army funded further development work on a completely new solution made by an advanced prosthetics company.

The CROWS addition with dazzling light derives from anti-piracy technology and is unlikely to be effective on land.

Adaptiv is fun but needs more work and smaller pixels to be effective. It's usable now to prevent friendly fire as it can trasmit an identifying heat signal.

I'd have chosen the K-MAX unmanned logistics helicopter as the game-changing UAV.

I recently attended the Soldier Technology show. Talk to soldiers and they just want reliable battery power (not necessarily longer just a guarantee it will last the mission) and less weight so they can carry more food and ammo. They actually got excited about new materials that will reduce the weight of their backpack by a couple of kilos. Oh, and not to have their nads blown off or brain damage.

Dammit woman stop talking dirty. I´m getting all hot and shit over here.  :perv:

Regarding the article I like the F-35 part, especially the "affordable" jest.

Admiral Yi

Is the guided bullet tech on the list?  That looked pretty fucking badass when I saw it on the Military Channel.

Viking

none of these will change warfare more than the humble camera phone.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Brazen

Quote from: Viking on May 31, 2012, 03:24:23 PM
none of these will change warfare more than the humble camera phone.
With augmented reality apps it's awesome for pennies.

If you want to get rich, sell a sturdy phone holder for a utility belt.

Viking

Quote from: Brazen on May 31, 2012, 03:26:08 PM
Quote from: Viking on May 31, 2012, 03:24:23 PM
none of these will change warfare more than the humble camera phone.
With augmented reality apps it's awesome for pennies.

If you want to get rich, sell a sturdy phone holder for a utility belt.

I was thinking in terms of creating out of context video.
First Maxim - "There are only two amounts, too few and enough."
First Corollary - "You cannot have too many soldiers, only too few supplies."
Second Maxim - "Be willing to exchange a bad idea for a good one."
Second Corollary - "You can only be wrong or agree with me."

A terrorist which starts a slaughter quoting Locke, Burke and Mill has completely missed the point.
The fact remains that the only person or group to applaud the Norway massacre are random Islamists.

Tonitrus

Quote from: Brazen on May 31, 2012, 03:17:22 PM
The new version of the HULC exoskeleton with extended battery life will be delivered for field trials in September. Can you image the power dying on you mid-patrol? It's far from finalised, though, only this week the US Army funded further development work on a completely new solution made by an advanced prosthetics company.

The CROWS addition with dazzling light derives from anti-piracy technology and is unlikely to be effective on land.

Adaptiv is fun but needs more work and smaller pixels to be effective. It's usable now to prevent friendly fire as it can transmit an identifying heat signal.

I'd have chosen the K-MAX unmanned logistics helicopter as the game-changing UAV.

I recently attended the Soldier Technology show. Talk to soldiers and they just want reliable battery power (not necessarily longer just a guarantee it will last the mission) and less weight so they can carry more food and ammo. They actually got excited about new materials that will reduce the weight of their backpack by a couple of kilos. Oh, and not to have their nads blown off or brain damage.

Granted, I am not a grunt, but....

I think the key with this kind of system, is that you cannot have it be something that soldiers rely on.  It should be something that makes the normal crap easier when it matters most, but can be shrugged off (maybe literally if necessary) if/when it fails.  I'd think it would be best for soldiers to train without the exoskeleton, as they do now, but be able to use it in real situations to make the crappy ruck march, or movement under fire of course, feel just that much easier.  These kind of things can always crap out for one reason or another, and you never want a trooper getting crapped into immobility by his own gear just because of that.

Razgovory

Quote from: Brazen on May 31, 2012, 03:17:22 PM


The CROWS addition with dazzling light derives from anti-piracy technology and is unlikely to be effective on land.


That's some hardcore DRM.
I've given it serious thought. I must scorn the ways of my family, and seek a Japanese woman to yield me my progeny. He shall live in the lands of the east, and be well tutored in his sacred trust to weave the best traditions of Japan and the Sacred South together, until such time as he (or, indeed his house, which will periodically require infusion of both Southern and Japanese bloodlines of note) can deliver to the South it's independence, either in this world or in space.  -Lettow April of 2011

Raz is right. -MadImmortalMan March of 2017