News:

And we're back!

Main Menu

Syria Disintegrating: Part 2

Started by jimmy olsen, May 22, 2012, 01:22:34 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

mongers

So for each 10s of millions of arms the US indirectly supply to the rebels, we'll exclude the Saudis and Qatar for the moment, how much will ultimately spent in dealing with the new spreading Jihadist quagmire created ?

Tens of billions ? :unsure:
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

Valmy

Quote from: mongers on March 06, 2013, 02:35:44 PM
So for each 10s of millions of arms the US indirectly supply to the rebels, we'll exclude the Saudis and Qatar for the moment, how much will ultimately spent in dealing with the new spreading Jihadist quagmire created ?

Tens of billions ? :unsure:

If we are lucky.  But the threatened Jihadist quagmire in Libya, Egypt, and Tunisia did not emerge.  Maybe everybody will be too tired after years and years and years of war to bother.
Quote"This is a Russian warship. I propose you lay down arms and surrender to avoid bloodshed & unnecessary victims. Otherwise, you'll be bombed."

Zmiinyi defenders: "Russian warship, go fuck yourself."

mongers

Quote from: Valmy on March 06, 2013, 02:39:50 PM
Quote from: mongers on March 06, 2013, 02:35:44 PM
So for each 10s of millions of arms the US indirectly supply to the rebels, we'll exclude the Saudis and Qatar for the moment, how much will ultimately spent in dealing with the new spreading Jihadist quagmire created ?

Tens of billions ? :unsure:

If we are lucky.  But the threatened Jihadist quagmire in Libya, Egypt, and Tunisia did not emerge.  Maybe everybody will be too tired after years and years and years of war to bother.

I'm not sure many people were suggesting that in the first place, ok Libya has it's problems, but much of the conflict seems to be clan based with a few free radical islamists thrown in.

The bigger issue with Libya seems to be the lack of control over the vast weapons depots left unguarded after the revolution. With some of it passing into the hands of ex-mercenaries/Tuareg militias who either went home or spread into neighbouring Saharan countries. 
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"


CountDeMoney

Quote from: Valmy on March 06, 2013, 02:39:50 PM
If we are lucky.  But the threatened Jihadist quagmire in Libya, Egypt, and Tunisia did not emerge.  Maybe everybody will be too tired after years and years and years of war to bother.


Don't worry;  like a bag of chips, it will all settle during transit and will eventually get messier before it gets better.

Admiral Yi

Quote from: mongers on March 06, 2013, 02:35:44 PM
So for each 10s of millions of arms the US indirectly supply to the rebels, we'll exclude the Saudis and Qatar for the moment, how much will ultimately spent in dealing with the new spreading Jihadist quagmire created ?

Tens of billions ? :unsure:

I heard about the decision to provide nonlethatl supplies, but nothing about arms.

CountDeMoney

Quote from: Admiral Yi on March 06, 2013, 03:37:37 PM
I heard about the decision to provide nonlethatl supplies, but nothing about arms.

We're not providing them directly, but we have been encouraging those parties that wish to do so.

QuoteAt a news conference in Doha with Qatar's Prime Minister Sheik Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber al-Thani, Kerry said Tuesday that "there are greater guarantees that weapons are being transferred to moderates and directly to the Syrian opposition."

He added that, "you can't guarantee that one weapon or another may not fall, in that kind of a situation, into hands that you don't want it in."

In Qatar, Kerry was wrapping up a nine-country swing through Europe and the Middle East, his first international tour since becoming secretary of state.

"We had a discussion about the types of weapons that are being transferred and by whom," Kerry said. "We did discuss the question of the ability to try to guarantee that it's going to the right people and to the moderate Syrian opposition coalition."

Because, you know, it's so much more reliable that way.

citizen k

Quote from: CountDeMoney on March 06, 2013, 03:41:49 PM
Because, you know, it's so much more reliable that way.

Background checks and gun registration is the obvious solution.


jimmy olsen

More bad news

http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/19/17370550-suffocating-in-the-streets-chemical-weapons-attack-reported-in-syria?lite

QuoteBy Ian Johnston, Charlene Gubash and Ammar Cheikomar, NBC News

A chemical weapon was used during fierce fighting in a strategically important Syrian town, rebels and the government claimed Tuesday, with each side blaming the other for the deadly attack.

If it is confirmed that a banned chemical agent was used, it could significantly change the international response to the ongoing civil war.

The death toll was put at 25 by Syria's state-run SANA news agency, which said dozens of other people were injured.

A photographer for the Reuters news agency visited hospitals in the city of Aleppo, and said a number of patients had breathing difficulties. They told him of people dying and "suffocating in the streets."

SANA blamed the rebels for the attack, which happened in Khan al-Asal in Aleppo province.

"Terrorists on Tuesday launched a rocket containing chemical materials," it said.

"Initial information indicated that about 16 citizens were killed, and 86 others were injured, most of them are in critical condition. Later, the death toll due to the firing of the rocket rose up to 25 martyrs," it added.

SANA's website showed photographs of a number of people, including several children, in what appeared to be a hospital.

'Convulsions, then death'
Information Minister Omran al-Zoabi said that "the substance in the rocket causes unconsciousness, then convulsions, then death," Reuters reported.

Mohammad al-Shafae, a member of the Local Coordination Committees in western Aleppo, said the attack happened around 8 a.m.

Rebel spokesman Fahd al Masry said a Scud missile was fired by the government and that "most probably" chemical weapons had been used. "This is not the first time," he added.

There was "a state of panic and fear among the civilians and dozens of cases of suffocating and poisoning," he said.

Masry said the attack would not have happened if foreign governments had taken stronger action.

"They wouldn't have used it if not for the silence of the international community on the crimes and massacres committed in Syria for the past two years," he said.

Masry said that the rebel forces may "be forced to reevaluate the rules of engagement in the coming days."

Ahmad al-Ahmad, a media activist near Khan al-Asal, said state media reports blaming the rebels for the attack were "ridiculous."

"This is ridiculous and cheap and stupid because we do not have these weapons and we do not know how to use them," he said.

Khan al-Asal is the last town in the area to the west of Aleppo that has not been taken by the rebels, and if it fell that would hamper the flow of supplies to the regime's forces in the city.

The town's population has traditionally been split between Sunni Muslims, who tend to be sympathetic toward the rebels, and Shiites, who are more likely to be supporters of President Bashar Assad.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said Tuesday the U.S. was looking carefully at allegations that both sides are using chemical weapons, but he said he was skeptical of any claims made by the Syrian regime, The Associated Press reported.

He added there was no evidence to back up the Assad regime's claim that Syrian rebels have used chemical weapons.

Carney said it was a serious concern for the U.S. that the Assad regime could use such weapons, the AP reported. He said President Barack Obama believed that would be unacceptable and that there would be consequences.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon spoke Tuesday with Ahmet Üzümcü, director general of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and expressed his "deep concern" about the alleged use of chemical weapons, according to a statement released by the United Nations.

"The Secretary-General remains convinced that the use of chemical weapons by any party under any circumstances would constitute an outrageous crime," the statement read.

On Dec. 24, there were claims that a number of Syrians were killed after inhaling "poisonous gases" released by government forces in rebel-held areas of the city of Homs.

OPCW spokesman Michael Louhan said the body was asked by the United Nations to give its assessment of this incident, but it was unable to find any "conclusive information regarding whether they were banned chemical weapon substances or not."

According to the international body, the Chemical Weapons Convention says it was created "for the sake of all mankind, to exclude completely the possibility" of their use.

'Abhorrent'
The U.K., which recently announced it was sending armored vehicles to the rebel forces, warned Tuesday that if the use of chemical weapons was confirmed it would change its approach.

"We are aware of today's press reports alleging that a chemical weapon was fired in the north of Syria and we are looking into this," a spokesman for the U.K. Foreign Office said.

"The use of chemical weapons would be abhorrent and would be universally condemned," he added. "The U.K. is clear that the use or proliferation of chemical weapons would demand a serious response from the international community and force us to revisit our approach so far."

Russia – one of Syria's dwindling number of allies - blamed the opposition, saying it was "seriously concerned" that "weapons of mass destruction are falling into the hands of the rebels," according to a foreign ministry statement reported by Reuters.

The Reuters photographer said victims he had visited in Aleppo hospitals were "mostly women and children."

"They said that people were suffocating in the streets and the air smelt strongly of chlorine," said the photographer, who Reuters said cannot be named for his own safety.

The photographer quoted victims he met at the University of Aleppo hospital and the al-Rajaa hospital as saying: "People were dying in the streets and in their houses."

Reuters described footage aired by Syrian state television:

    Men, women and children were rushed inside on stretchers as doctors inserted medical drips into their arms and oxygen tubes into their mouths. None had visible wounds to their bodies, but some interviewed said they had trouble breathing.

    An unidentified doctor interviewed on the channel said the attack was either "phosphorus or poison" but did not elaborate.

    "The Free Syrian Army hit us with a rocket, we smelled something and then everyone got dizzy and fell down. People were falling to the ground, " said a sobbing woman, lying on a stretcher with a drip in her arm.

    A young girl on a stretcher wept as she said: "My chest closed up. I couldn't talk. I couldn't breathe ... We saw people falling dead to the floor. My father fell, he fell and now we don't know where he is. God curse them, I hope they die."

    A man in a green surgical mask, who said he had been helping to evacuate the casualties, said: "It was like a powder, and anyone who breathed it in fell to the ground."

Reuters, The Associated Press and NBC News' John Newland contributed to this report.
It is far better for the truth to tear my flesh to pieces, then for my soul to wander through darkness in eternal damnation.

Jet: So what kind of woman is she? What's Julia like?
Faye: Ordinary. The kind of beautiful, dangerous ordinary that you just can't leave alone.
Jet: I see.
Faye: Like an angel from the underworld. Or a devil from Paradise.
--------------------------------------------
1 Karma Chameleon point

mongers

Tim, this could be as innocuous as the intentional use or accidental release of a 'riot gas' like CS, which iirc is a banned weapon of war in international conflicts, but not so in a civil war. 

I'm not sure that there is a lot to see here, other than the rebel PR or government propagandists getting desperate. 
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

Admiral Yi

We could find out what Obama's "red line" means.

Crazy_Ivan80

I hope lots of those jihadis die slow and horrible deaths there. We absolutely do not want them back over here

mongers

#732
The Al-Nusra Front, possibly the most effective rebel/insurgent group in Syria, pledges allegiance to al-Qaeda.  :hmm:

Quote
Syria crisis: Al-Nusra pledges allegiance to al-Qaeda

The leader of the al-Nusra Front, a jihadist group fighting in Syria, has pledged allegiance to the leader of al-Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahiri.

Abu Mohammed al-Jawlani said the group's behaviour in Syria would not change as a result.

Al-Nusra claims to have carried out many suicide bombings and guerrilla attacks against state targets.

On Tuesday, al-Qaeda in Iraq announced a merger with al-Nusra, but Mr Jawlani said he had not been consulted on this.

Al-Nusra has been designated as a terrorist organisation by the US.

Debates among Western leaders over whether to arm Syria's rebels have often raised the concern of weapons ending up in the hands of groups such as al-Nusra.

"The sons of al-Nusra Front pledge allegiance to Sheikh Ayman al-Zawahiri," Mr Jawlani said in a recording released on Wednesday.

....

rest of article here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22095099


Things are going so well for all outside actors in Syria, pity the poor Syrians in the middle of this.
"We have it in our power to begin the world over again"

CountDeMoney

Quote from: mongers on April 10, 2013, 01:45:35 PM
The Al-Nusra Front, possibly the most effective rebel/insurgent group in Syria, pledges allegiance to al-Qaeda.  :hmm:

Yes, by all means, give them weapons.  WHAT COULD HAPPEN

Berkut

Is anyone seriously suggesting that we should arm the "rebels" in Syria?

I haven't followed it all that much, to be honest - seems like a relatively clear case of "Fuck that, not touching that conflict with a ten foot pool..."
"If you think this has a happy ending, then you haven't been paying attention."

select * from users where clue > 0
0 rows returned