The Dallas Fed Is Calling For The Immediate Breakup Of Large Banks

[jimmy olsen]

Lets get this party started! 

http://www.businessinsider.com/dallas-fed-calls-for-breakup-of-big-banks-2012-3#ixzz1plgWWQ7l

The Dallas Fed Is Calling For The Immediate Breakup Of Large Banks
Joe Weisenthal | Mar. 21, 2012, 10:03 AM

The Dallas Fed Is Calling For The Immediate Breakup Of Large Banks
Joe Weisenthal | Mar. 21, 2012, 10:03 AM | 57,387 | 61

    inShare48
     
     
    A A A

Richard FisherIt's hard not to think it's a big deal when a branch of the Federal Reserve system calls for the breakup of major American banks.

The bank has just released its annual report, and the title of the letter is: Choosing the Road to Prosperity Why We Must End Too Big to Fail—Now.

Here's the full letter from Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher, generally known as one of the most hawkish and conservative Fed Presidents.

Letter from the
President
If you are running one of the "too-big- to-fail" (TBTF) banks—alternatively known as "systemically important financial institutions," or SIFIs—I doubt you are going to like what you read in this annual report essay written by Harvey Rosenblum, the head of the Dallas Fed's Research Department, a highly regarded Federal Reserve veteran of 40 years and the former president of the National Association for Business Economics.

Memory fades with the passage of time. Yet it is important to recall that it was in recog- nition of the precarious position in which the TBTF banks and SIFIs placed our economy in 2008 that the U.S. Congress passed into law the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd–Frank). While the act established a number of new macroprudential features to help promote financial stability, its overarching purpose, as stated unambiguously in its preamble, is ending TBTF.

However, Dodd–Frank does not eradi- cate TBTF. Indeed, it is our view at the Dallas Fed that it may actually perpetuate an already dangerous trend of increasing banking industry concentration. More than half of banking industry assets are on the books of just five institutions. The top 10 banks now account for 61 percent of commercial banking assets, substantially more than the 26 percent of only 20 years ago; their combined assets equate to half of our nation's GDP. Further, as Rosenblum argues in his essay, there are signs that Dodd– Frank's complexity and opaqueness may evenbe working against the economic recovery. In addition to remaining a lingering threat to financial stability, these megabanks signifi- cantly hamper the Federal Reserve's ability to properly conduct monetary policy.

They were a primary culprit in magnifying the financial crisis, and their presence continues to play an impor- tant role in prolonging our economic malaise.There are good reasons why this recovery has remained frustratingly slow compared with periods following previous recessions, and I believe it has very little to do with the Federal Reserve. Since the onset of the Great Recession, we have undertaken a number of initiatives— some orthodox, some not—to revive and kick-start the economy. As I like to say, we've filled the tank with plenty of cheap, high-octane gasoline. But as any mechanic can tell you, it takes more than just gas to propel a car.

The lackluster nature of the recovery is certainly the byproduct of the debt-infused boom that preceded the Great Recession, as is the excessive uncertainty surrounding the actions—or rather, inactions—of our fiscal au- thorities in Washington. But to borrow an anal- ogy Rosenblum crafted, if there is sludge on the crankshaft—in the form of losses and bad loans on the balance sheets of the TBTF banks—then the bank-capital linkage that greases the engine of monetary policy does not function properly to drive the real economy. No amount of liquidity provided by the Federal Reserve can change this.

Perhaps the most damaging effect of prop- agating TBTF is the erosion of faith in American capitalism. Diverse groups ranging from the Occupy Wall Street movement to the Tea Party argue that government-assisted bailouts of reckless financial institutions are sociologically and politically offensive. From an economic perspective, these bailouts are certainly harmful to the efficient workings of the market.

I encourage you to read the following essay. The TBTF institutions that amplified and prolonged the recent financial crisis remain a hindrance to full economic recovery and to the very ideal of American capitalism.

It is imperative that we end TBTF. In my view, downsizing the behemoths over time into institutions that can be prudently managed and regulated across borders is the appropriate policy response. Only thencantheprocessof "creativedestruction"— which America has perfected and practiced with such effectiveness that it led our country to unprecedented economic achievement— work its wonders in the financial sector, just as it does elsewhere in our economy. Only then will we have a financial system fit and proper for serving as the lubricant for an economy as dynamic as that of the United States.


Later in the report, there's this explainer of how Too Big To Fail is a perversion of capitalism:

TBTF: A Perversion of Capitalism

A n unfortunate side effect of the government's massive aid to TBTF banks has been an erosion of faith in American capitalism. Ordinary workers and consumers who might usually thank capitalism for their higher living standards have seen a perverse side of the system, where they see that normal rules of markets don't apply to the rich, powerful and well-connected.

Here are some ways TBTF has violated basic tenets of a capitalist sys-tem:

Capitalism requires the freedom to succeed and the freedom to fail.
Hard work and good decisions should be rewarded. Perhaps more impor- tant, bad decisions should lead to failure—openly and publicly. Econo- mist Allan Meltzer put it this way:"Capitalism without failure is like religion without sin."

Capitalism requires government to enforce the rule of law. This requires maintaining a level playing field.The privatization of profits and socializa- tion of losses is completely unacceptable.TBTF undermines equal treat- ment, reinforcing the perception of a system tilted in favor of the rich and powerful.

Capitalism requires businesses and individuals be held accountable for the consequences of their actions. Accountability is a key ingredient for maintaining public faith in the economic system.The perception—and the reality—is that virtually nobody has been punished or held account- able for their roles in the financial crisis.

The idea that some institutions are TBTF inexorably erodes the founda- tions of our market-based system of capitalism.

This chart from the report shows nicely how much more concentrated things have become.

[MadImmortalMan]

Start with BofA. 

[jimmy olsen]

Start with BofA. 

[Ideologue]

Tim, I usually don't get onto you for misspellings, but you really botched "nationalize" in your thread title.

[sbr]

 

[Barrister]

Tim, I usually don't get onto you for misspellings, but you really botched "nationalize" in your thread title.

You want to nationalize banks?

You'd love Alberta then.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATB_Financial

[Razgovory]

I'm not sure I'm comfortable with nationalizing all the big banks.

[Sheilbh]

Tim, I usually don't get onto you for misspellings, but you really botched "nationalize" in your thread title.

[Razgovory]

What is with you people?

[Ideologue]

Tim, I usually don't get onto you for misspellings, but you really botched "nationalize" in your thread title.

That's the Shaun I know and love.

[Ideologue]

Tim, I usually don't get onto you for misspellings, but you really botched "nationalize" in your thread title.

You want to nationalize banks?

You'd love Alberta then.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATB_Financial

Best Workplace for Millennials

Ohh. : /

Anyway, sounds good.

[HisMajestyBOB]

A ridiculous idea. Those top 5 banks are the engine that drive campaign contributions our economy!